After a long day of questioning by senators hoping to find out more about Solicitor General Elena Kagan, there's one thing they now know for sure: No matter how they try to get her to discuss her judicial philosophy, there's no hard answer. For Kagan, it's all on a case-by-case basis.
At least, that's the sense Kagan conveyed today over and over again when asked about her political views and how they might influence her role on the Supreme Court.
Asked about issues including abortion, military recruitment, "don't ask, don't tell," executive power and other hot-button issues, Kagan always asserted that the law was the law, precedent was binding, and that's how she'd plan on ruling if any of those issues fell before her if her nomination was confirmed. She often answered questions with phrases indicating she felt she would bring no bias to the bench.
"I think I will take this one case at a time," she said several times. Others times, it came in the form of "I will try to judge each case as it comes."
The remarks were ironic, some congressmen noted, especially for someone who had once before written that the nomination process had become somewhat of a farce with barely any substance. So, she was asked her own question that she said would be fair to ask any nominee: How she felt she might move the institution, politically. Kagan said she expected that she wouldn't, but was pressed further, saying it was a question she herself obviously thought was fair and important.
"It might be a fair question ..." Kagan said, her voice rising, then pausing before it trailed off. It was almost as if she wanted to answer, or couldn't say "but I won't answer it."
Day 2 of questioning: Guns, abortion, jokes
Senators tried several ways to find out where she would fall as a judge - because she has never sat on a judicial bench - asking about her views on other justices, the court's prior rulings and previous precedents. She did answer questions about a military recruitment issue and abortion, and about several other issues in roundabout ways. But she didn't waver much in her answers, though she tried often to invoke some humor in them.
"I would not want to characterize the current court in any way - I hope one day to join it," Kagan said at one point, drawing comical remarks from senators that she may have some politician in her yet.
The hearing also had its contentious moments, including one between Sen. Jeff Sessions and Kagan, regarding her role as a dean at Harvard University and military recruiters being allowed on campus. At one point, Sessions said he thought Kagan was "unconnected to reality" in how she was classifying the situation. The hearing also had a few moments of sparring among committee members: Sen. Orrin Hatch and Sen. Patrick Leahy got into a small debate when Leahy tried to tell his colleague to rephrase his questioning.
But like many other moments during the hearing, the tension was broken with some laughter.
"We have to have a little back and forth every once in a while, or this place would be boring as hell, I'll tell you," Hatch said, laughing. Kagan responded that she was happy it took the spotlight off her for a moment.
"By the way, I've been informed that hell is not boring," Hatch remarked, laughing.
And during a break in the questioning, when not everyone was back in time, Sen. Jon Kyl found a way to invoke some humor himself.
"General Kagan, you can see how important my colleagues think my questions are here," Kyl said, with Leahy, the committee's chairman, chiming in quickly that he was there.
Kagan offered a quick-witted response that perhaps couldn't be more ironic: "Or how important my answers are."
I have read some of the comments here. If you aren't watching the hearings, maybe you should. You will learn a lot and it won't be second hand. Then you can make up your own mind, instead of repeating what you heard or what some else thinks.
One other thing, It's time for Sessions to pack it in. How in the world did he get this job. When I see and hear people like him all I can think of is "term Limits"
Another politician that wont give a straight answer ever, till told to by soros and the dems
Rah, Rah. You go CNN. Bunch of cheerleaders.
She may not have been a judge before this nomination, but George Bush Jr. wasn't a Senator before he became the President. What qualified him to be president other than he was the Governor of Texas?
The whole confirmation process needs to be revamped. What a ridiculous waste of taxpayer money for senators to sit for days asking questions the candidate will not answer! It reminds of the "rope-a-dope" defense in boxing that Muhammad Ali used in his later years.
There are thousands of Federal and state judges. Pick on..any freaking one. Each will be more qualified and more unbiased than Kagan. If the President is not willing to practice the Merit Principles of Affirmative Action, then abolish the EEOC and save taxpayer over 300 million dollars each year. No to Kagan...hell no.
This blog – This Just In – will no longer be updated. Looking for the freshest news from CNN? Go to our ever-popular CNN.com homepage on your desktop or your mobile device, and join the party at @cnnbrk, the world's most-followed account for news.