The Department of Homeland Security is going to begin reviewing all 300,000 pending deportation cases in federal immigration courts to determine which individuals meet specific criteria for removal and to focus on "our highest priorities."
Officials say immigration court dockets are clogged, putting public safety in jeopardy, costing money, resources and time. They want to see DHS enforcement resources diverted from illegal immigrants who don't have criminal records to individuals who pose a threat to public safety and national security.
So what does all this mean for illegal immigrants and what are the "highest priorities?"
In a memo, director of U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement John Morton lays out what circumstances should be taken into account when it comes to prosecuting immigration cases.
Morton describes some factors that should give cases a lower priority. Those include:
– veterans and members of the U.S. armed forces;
– long-time lawful permanent residents;
– minors and elderly individuals;
– individuals present in the United States since childhood;
– pregnant or nursing women;
– victims of domestic violence; trafficking, or other serious crimes;
– individuals who suffer from a serious mental or physical disability; and
– individuals with serious health conditions.
He also lays out negative factors that could lead officials to focus on certain cases. Those include:
– individuals who pose a clear risk to national security;
– serious felons, repeat offenders, or individuals with a lengthy criminal record of any kind;
– known gang members or other individuals who pose a clear danger to public safety; and
– individuals with an egregious record of immigration violations, including those with a record of illegal re-entry and those who have engaged in immigration fraud.
Morton also includes a general list of factors that lawyers, officers and other officials should consider when evaluating immigration cases. For a more detailed list of these factors read the document here (PDF)