Lawmaker's high-speed rail plan: Will it fly?
A new plan would launch a high-speed rail service between Boston to Washington.
December 13th, 2011
03:42 PM ET

Lawmaker's high-speed rail plan: Will it fly?

How fast can high-speed trains come to the Northeast corridor? Not fast enough for Republican Rep. John Mica of Florida.

The chairman of the House Transportation Committee recently came out with a proposal to create a high-speed rail line – trains that can travel more than 200 mph – between Boston and D.C. in 10 to 15 years. Can it be done in half the time Amtrak said it would take?

“It absolutely can be done,” said Andy Kunz, president of the U.S. High Speed Rail Association, an independent trade group. “No one said it’s going to be easy. The Northeast corridor … will be probably the most complicated rail line in America to upgrade.”

Listen to the CNN Radio Reports Podcast here:

More than 700,000 passengers ride the rails of the Northeast corridor every day. The trains would have to keep rolling while construction takes place, not just Amtrak trains but commuter lines that run through several major cities.

“You’re talking about eight or nine states that have to cooperate,” Kunz said. “The federal government, Amtrak and several transit agencies all have to cooperate. That’s what’s going to be the bottleneck.”

A lengthy and complicated environmental impact statement must first be performed for the entire line from Boston to Washington. That could take three or four years.

“Then, after that, the normal procedure is that you would produce specific environmental impact statements on each segment of the corridor,” said Petra Todorovich, director of the America 2050 Project at the Regional Plan Association, an urban planning think tank in New York.  “So that’s a whole process that could drag on for five, six, seven, eight years, possibly.”

Todorovich studied the nation’s transportation needs moving forward as the U.S. population is projected to grow by 130 million people over the next four decades.

“I’m glad that Chairman Mica is pushing us here, because frankly, the 30-year timetable is too long,” Todorovich said. But she has her doubts. “Honestly, I’m not sure if we can complete it in 10 to 15 years.”

Mica thinks a public-private partnership can succeed with a shorter timetable.

“Congress can set the parameters for how this is done. Congress can speed up the project. We just have to have a commitment to get it done,” he said.

You can also listen to the CNN Radio Reports podcast on itunes or subscribe to the podcast here.

soundoff (20 Responses)
  1. banasy©

    Bc(iah):
    They could use that money to shore up our crumbling infrastructure...we really don't need this.
    Not at all.

    December 14, 2011 at 3:11 pm | Report abuse |
  2. THE ONE AND ONLY DRAKOREX1

    OH THEYARE PUSHING IT ALL OVER,IT REMNDS ME OF MID AMERICA AIR PORT ,THEY INSISTED TO BUILD AS WE VOTED AGAINST IT. OVER10 -15yrs its still empty. the lights are on 24 hours aday 20 BIG SUVS WITH BLACKED OUT WINDOWS.NO MAJOR AIR LINE WILL TOUCH THE PLACE . AND HOW MANY TAX DOLLARS TRASHED?GOOGLE IT MID AMERICA AIR PORT MASCOUTAH IL 62258

    December 14, 2011 at 3:25 pm | Report abuse |
1 2