Murdoch launches Twitter tirade against Obama, Google over online piracy
Rupert Murdoch, seen at Sunday's Golden Globe Awards, went to bat for his companies on Twitter in the battle against Internet piracy.
January 16th, 2012
11:23 AM ET

Murdoch launches Twitter tirade against Obama, Google over online piracy

Rupert Murdoch didn't waste any time using his newfound popularity on Twitter to make waves and take shots at some other major names.

His targets? President Barack Obama and Google.

The media mogul took aim at the president and the leading Internet search engine after the White House announced over the weekend that it would not support legislation mandating changes to Internet infrastructure to fight online copyright and trademark infringement. The White House statement came in response to two petitions circulating on the Internet as well as widespread comments across the Web about the dangers of the legislation.

A major online backlash has developed regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act, with everyone from lawmakers to Web freedom advocates to some of technology's biggest players calling it a greedy and dangerous overreach that could have a chilling effect on free speech and innovation. Google, Yahoo and Facebook are among the Web heavyweights who have joined the chorus against SOPA, which backers hope to have ready for a vote by the end of the year.

The combination of Google and Obama attacking the bill clearly didn't make Murdoch happy. He began unleashing his frustration on Twitter by attacking Obama's relationship with so-called "Silicon Valley paymasters."

Naturally, Murdoch has a dog in the SOPA fight too his massive media empire. No doubt he doesn't care for all the websites where users can watch and download episodes of his company's TV shows and movies without ever subscribing or paying.

And clearly he isn't happy that all of this is out there. It means a loss of money for him and his advertisers. And for that, Murdoch squarely blames Google.

For his remarks, Murdoch took a bit of a beating on Twitter, where most people are advocates of an open Web without government control. Some users argued he was outdated in his thinking and were quick to point out that Google has done a lot to help the media.  Some said it was foolish to criticize a search engine for having links available in its search. Users swung back at Murdoch that you can't complain about what a search engine's results turn up.

So Murdoch changed his tactic a bit, trying to humanize the issue.

For many users on Twitter, that didn't go over well either. Now, thousands of people tweeted, all of a sudden Murdoch was coming to the aid of the little guy?

So Rupert, still in his tweeting infancy, wanted to make clear he didn't have only bad things to say about Google.

That was, apparently, until he went back to the search engine and took a look at what was out there for the new "Mission Impossible" film. He saw the results as evidence that his anger toward Google was warranted.

He then admitted that while he may not understand completely all details and nuances of the fight and Google's role, he did know enough to know he didn't like what he saw.

So what did the search engine giant think of the media mogul's Twitter allegations? A representative told CNET it was "nonsense." 

"Last year we took down 5 million infringing Web pages from our search results and invested more than $60 million in the fight against bad ads. ... We fight pirates and counterfeiters every day," the spokeswoman told CNET.

Murdoch never quite clarified whether he'd like the search engine to do more to take those links down, or if he perhaps wished companies like his could play more of a role in asking for something to be taken down if it infringed upon their copyright.

But his fight continued, culminating at perhaps the  perfect time: the day of the Golden Globes. As fans tweeted their thoughts on who was going to win and shared their excitement to see the best of the best in the industry, Murdoch turned back to those very people to show that piracy was a real danger to Hollywood.

He ended with a shot at Obama, asking why he would align himself with the "pirates" who help push illegal content online. (Murdoch later clarified that in this tweet he had an autocorrect issue on his iPad and had clearly meant to reference POTUS, the president of the United States, instead of the name of an Australian company.

Post by:
Filed under: Movies • Music • Rupert Murdoch • Showbiz • TV
soundoff (403 Responses)
  1. K.C.

    ...Pot calling the kettle black...

    January 16, 2012 at 1:36 pm | Report abuse |
    • Rich

      KC has it right. We used to say, "consider the source" in cases like this before moving on to the next topic.

      January 16, 2012 at 1:47 pm | Report abuse |
  2. cel

    Murdoch steals from the poor to give to the rich, Reverse Robin Hood, I;d call that piracy. Murdoch is more guilty of piracy than anyone else. He spends his cash to cancel out the votes of We The People and then pretends to support Democracy. Go away, you nasty, ugly Aussie. Keep it at home where it belongs.

    January 16, 2012 at 1:39 pm | Report abuse |
  3. Wobbles

    Truly a shame Rupert Murdoch didn't pick last week to take a cruise off the coast of Italy.

    January 16, 2012 at 1:41 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Richard

    "The burden of protection against piracy should be on the entertainment industry, not on the government, and therefore the taxpayers. Studios and recording companies should spend more money on the talent needed to make their products hack-proof (if there is such a thing), and charge a reasonable download price that most of us would be happy to pay for whatever entertains us, instead of lobbying congress to protect their goods. What a bunch of crybabies, Murdoch included."
    –not my words but I agree 100%!!!

    January 16, 2012 at 1:42 pm | Report abuse |
  5. fearlessdude

    Rupert Murdoch, I don't care how rich you are or what you have to say, but be respectful when you address our President. For your information it is "President Obama", and you may even stand up. Your manners suck.

    January 16, 2012 at 1:43 pm | Report abuse |
  6. Tom Twit

    He's just being "Fair and Balanced." LOL.

    January 16, 2012 at 1:44 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Aod

    Isn't this guy dead yet?

    January 16, 2012 at 1:44 pm | Report abuse |
  8. Boomer in Mo

    Sigh. I don't understand the internet, and doubt old Rupert does either. Pretty sure Congress as a whole doesn't. There probably need to be some changes, but they must be made carefully. MO accidently made it illegal for any teacher in the state to have a Facebook or other social media account, and maybe even a cell phone, and the law had to be changed later. Unintended consequences.

    January 16, 2012 at 1:46 pm | Report abuse |
  9. arthur uzo

    The most disgusting ....." ido$t" on planet earth.

    January 16, 2012 at 1:47 pm | Report abuse |
  10. SuckIt Murdoch

    Suckk it Mudoch.

    January 16, 2012 at 1:47 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Joe

    Google should buy a controlling share of Murdocks empire and define a "New Media World Order"!

    January 16, 2012 at 1:50 pm | Report abuse |
  12. Thomas

    What a liar.

    January 16, 2012 at 1:50 pm | Report abuse |
  13. Jean Sartre, Milwauke, WI

    Rupert Murdoch has been brain-dead for decades... can't we just bury him?

    January 16, 2012 at 1:52 pm | Report abuse |
    • Sue

      We can´t, worms would refuse to eat his body.

      January 16, 2012 at 2:02 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Pat

    Who let him out of his sty?

    January 16, 2012 at 1:54 pm | Report abuse |
  15. banasy©

    Forget about the primaries. Skewed, horrible media bias, potentially even rigged...if Ron Paul does not win GOP nomination and does not run Independent – just do a write-in. Myself and hundreds of others I know will be writing-in Paul during the General Election. Do so and tell everyone else you know to do this also! Ron Paul 2012.

    January 16, 2012 at 1:59 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21