January 25th, 2012
12:38 PM ET

Did you buy what Obama was pitching in State of the Union address?

With his re-election at stake, President Obama in his State of the Union address late Tuesday said "no challenge is more urgent" than keeping the American dream alive.

He laid out his plan for reinvigorating the economy by again calling for the wealthy to pay more in taxes. He called for lowering corporate taxes and providing incentives for U.S. manufacturers to bring overseas jobs back to America, while ending tax breaks for businesses that continue to outsource. Obama also ordered his administration to open up 75% of potential offshore oil and gas resources. He also challenged Congress to act on comprehensive immigration reform, and he called for legislation like the DREAM Act that offers children of illegal immigrants who go to college or serve in the military a path to possible citizenship.

Read the president's speech  | Key points of his speech

Whether he can get a divided Congress to act on the issues he set forth Tuesday night will be a big question during his re-election campaign. As CNN contributor Julian Zelizer asks: Is the Obama presidency "built to last"? But perhaps the bigger issue is: Can Obama get the support of a frustrated nation behind him to give him another term?

 When it comes down to it, it's a question of whether America bought what Obama was pitching.

Zennie Abraham told CNN iReport that he was impressed by Obama's State of the Union address, which he saw as a wholehearted and necessary embrace of a pro-U.S. trade policy.

"The President now realizes that nationalism is the one approach that will save America, whereas when he first took office, our allies, like France and Germany, were trying to talk him into maintaining the 'free trade is good' policy that has harmed America," Abraham said. "In doing so, Obama also hones his case for good old-fashioned Liberalism."

Abraham, from Oakland, California, said he felt Obama delivered "an excellent speech," one that was right for our struggling country, and took the steps to begin showing just how he will turn it around.

"He outlined the role of government in our lives as it is needed in our lives now to improve America and restore our standard of living," he said.

But Vernon Hill, a conservative-leaning voter, was generally disappointed with the State of the Union speech, and doesn't think that Obama has achieved enough to deserve another term as president.

Hill felt there were many more issues that Obama needed to address that had been hampering his ability to get anything done.

"Obama has been his own worst enemy by surrounding himself with people who will not disagree with him and whom have no business backgrounds," he argued.

Hill, who is from Morehead City, North Carolina, said he felt the president is a "master storyteller," but needed to talk more actual substance about bypassing Congress, the Keystone XL pipeline project, the deficit, and the current cost of gas. So, for him, Obama's speech was just another example of "more promises and hope."  And Hill said Obama hasn't shown that he can go past rhetoric and deliver results.

"If he can't succeed in three years, four more years would be more failure on his part," he said. "Obama has been his own worst enemy."

Egberto Willies told CNN iReport that Obama needed to go harder and more forcefully moving forward.

"I hope Obama does take a more aggressive approach. People like his calm approach. They know his accomplishments but they are still in dire straits," he said. "He must point specifically to the root of our current demise, and forcefully state that being given a second term with a Congress willing to work for the American people, as opposed to an ideology, is essential."

Willies, from Kingwood, Texas, said he did however think Obama took the first steps toward that goal by delivering an appropriately articulated speech that presented how he will move his vision forward. Willies said he believes the speech will help get the president re-elected.

"It is likely the best State of the Union address that he has ever given," Willies said.

Willies said he thought Obama was able to tout his specific accomplishments, while refuting what he saw as fallacies being floated by the Republicans about his policies. And he told the American people that regardless of the gridlock, he would find a way to help them, Willies said.

"He also most importantly said where he has the power to act, he will, and if Congress comes along it would be better," he said.

Willies, who attended a watch party, interviewed several guests about what they thought about Obama's speech. Several of the people there said they thought it was an "excellent speech," one that touched on all of the issues he needs to be talking about. And many of those people said they were pleasantly surprised that Obama delivered even more than they had expected in his fight for a strong middle class.

But not everyone praised Obama's ideas or believes he can pull off the feat of bringing the government together to create change.

A commenter with the username xtallake said that Obama's ideas are just not the right ones for this country.

"He is too far liberal and the cause of the completely divided Congress. And he doesn't even know it," xtallake wrote. "He needs to unite and compromise...but he doesn't. He will not be re-elected again....unless he actually tries to work with the other side. We need a uniter."

Longtime iReporter and political junkie Omekongo Dibinga is optimistic about Obama's presidency after watching Tuesday night's address, but believes Obama has a way to go before his rhetoric and accomplishments come into alignment.

"Presidents are generally more aggressive with their agenda on their second time around," Dibinga said. "The main thing I want to see are long-lasting improvements in education."

For him, it is time for Obama's rhetoric to really bear some fruit. And while he feels that Obama delivered some strong ideas that set him apart from the Republican candidates' offerings, the proof of whether Obama is the right one to lead will be in the results, he said.

"'I am indeed optimistic but I just haven't seen some of the things he was talking about bear themselves out over the past three years," he said.

Mark Ivy agreed that Obama presented some solid ideas during his speech that delivered plenty of red meat to his base, but said that Obama needs to address the national debt and deficit spending in order to attract swing voters and win re-election.

"'We are all in this together. We must all be willing to give a little," he said. "The number one way to attack the debt and attract Independents and Republicans is a real plan of attack on the tax breaks, the tax deductions that cause the disparity in the effective tax rates. This must (be) done across the board."

Ivy, who is from Farmersburg, Indiana, said he believed closing the "loopholes" would have a real impact, and it is a move he believes both Republicans and independents can support.

The speech, Ivy said, was a "populist and mostly moderate course of action for the next 10 months." But Ivy said he wished the president had discussed even more specifics rather than general themes.

Overall, Ivy thought Obama gave an "excellent stump speech."

"But he offered nothing  that would inspire or win over Republicans or independents," Ivy said. "While I give the President kudos for his closing and  mentioning Seal Team 6 and the mission to kill Osama Bin Laden, there was very little new and nothing to breathe life into our sagging economy or to stymie the ruptured artery of debt siphoning the life from the nation."

But not all of those who generally oppose Obama thought he did all that badly in laying out his vision for the country.

"Forgive me. I am a Republican and a Conservative. But I just cannot deny that Obama is EXACTLY what the country needs right now," user SteedLaw commented. "What I just heard is what every American has been waiting to hear. Can he achieve it? Well, it sounds like Congress just needs to get those bills put together. Otherwise, I think it is safe to say it is curtains for the GOP this round.

"Obama may not be many things, but there is no doubt he is a true leader. Until I hear anything of that magnitude come from the mouth of a republican candidate (which I doubt), Obama can count on my vote."

That's a sentiment other readers echoed, wondering if what Obama did last night shines a spotlight on the GOP and what it is offering or not offering.

"Obama is not the perfect choice, but the best one for 2012," a user named imdudesdad commented. "The Republicans offer nobody who can do better. With them, it's more Bush policies and maybe worse attacking Iran for another expensive government spending program. Obama isn't perfect, but is by far the best."

Adriana Maxwell said she thinks that Obama's State of the Union address was great oration, but she's skeptical about how much of his agenda will actually be put into action unless he attempts to compromise with the GOP-controlled house.

After talking about several of the plans that Obama mentioned Tuesday night, Maxwell said she suspects that Republicans will argue his plans will only increase the size of the government and not actually save money for consumers.

"Occasionally Speaker Boehner and other Republican leadership will comment that they haven't spoken to the President about the legislation," she said. "It gives the appearance the that the White House is not cooperating on domestic issues."

And that could be a big issue, based on all of the plans Obama laid out Tuesday night. If he can't get support, he'll be forced to try to go at it alone, and that's something Maxwell said she thinks isn't exactly the best idea. She said there needs to be a real effort by the president to lead a collaborative effort to turn the nation around from what she calls a "state of disunion."

One commenter, Mike500, said the speech only solidified his opinion that Obama was the worst leader since President Jimmy Carter.

"More class warfare. More big government. More spending other people's money," he wrote. "Truly sad."

Independent voter Melissa Fazli was motivated by the State of the Union address to support Obama's re-election campaign. She says she strongly supports Obama's call to investigate and bring prosecution against the lending practices that led to the housing crisis.

As a former real estate agent, she said she saw mortgages that never should have being given. So when Obama announced his special task force, it hit Fazli hard.

"I was literally brought to tears," she said.

She added she hoped that Attorney General Eric Holder would take Obama's message to heart and work to bring real justice to those "that were bamboozled by these big banks."

"I would like to see it enforced by everyone using social media everyday to keep it on Obama's table until indictments are made," she said. "I would love to see some of these banks go directly to jail and not collect even $200 along the way."

Obama's statement didn't just make her get teary-eyed. It also convinced her to make a drastic change, proving that perhaps for some, Obama did do enough to restore their faith in him.

"I have something to confess," she said. "As a 22-year registered voter of the American Independent Party I am switching over to the Democratic Party. I believe in a democratic society, for the people and by the people and President Barack Obama has convinced me to switch from an Independent to a Democrat."

While she voted for Obama in 2008, she felt that Tuesday's speech cemented her belief in his views.

"I realize after listening to all the GOP candidates and listening to Obama's State of the Union address that I am really a Democrat, so much so, that I printed out my voter registration form and already switched to the Democratic Party."

soundoff (2,654 Responses)
  1. Michael

    I didn't buy it.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:37 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  2. marcia

    Obama doesn't deserve one more day in office. Hopefully his butt will be kicked out in 2012!

    January 25, 2012 at 5:38 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Sarah

      So you are looking forward to more bank failures, wall street games, throw in a couple more wars, a few more freedoms removed, and well if you are already making millions a year, more large pay increases?

      January 25, 2012 at 5:46 pm | Report abuse |
    • ddblah

      You want to go back to the policy that brought us record deficit even in good years and a huge bubble that almost destroyed us? You want that?

      January 25, 2012 at 5:49 pm | Report abuse |
  3. John S

    If you like Obama as a speaker he can motivate you very well. As a someone who puts results to those speeches. I give him a F. He had two years of his current term with a Democratically controlled Congress and a recession reaching its peak. He did nothing but pass a expensive stimulus bill and move on to his pet project Health Care. I do not think he has focussed on what is critical in America and I think 4 years is plenty of time for any President who has conviction to get things done. Other Presidents have done more even with a opposing party controlling Congress. Its time for someone new Obama.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:38 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • jon

      Corporations gave away millions upon millions of our good paying jobs over the past several decades. President Obama did not do that. (Nor did President Bush). Put the blame where it actually belongs. Companies and Corporations are hammering us middle-class folks.

      January 25, 2012 at 5:41 pm | Report abuse |
    • ddblah

      Jon: and the tax code encourages precisely that.

      January 25, 2012 at 5:50 pm | Report abuse |
  4. L.Davis

    NO...... I don't believe his rhetoric.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:38 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  5. M. Chino Yap

    I will vote Obama again this year!

    January 25, 2012 at 5:38 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  6. Randy, San Francisco

    President Obama is right on target. His plan will benefit the 99 per cent, unlike the GOP/Tea Party plan which favors the 1%. The populist speech is NOT class warfare. American populism has been around since the 1870s.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:39 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  7. ipawilzon

    Yes, I definitely would give him four more years because look at the other options... Mitt ? Mitt would take our country, split it up, take his cut, and sell out portions to our neighbors. That's what he does right?? But then he might just bankrupt us. Its all depending on his 5th or 6th decision on what do to. That flip-flopping money hungry POS..

    January 25, 2012 at 5:39 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  8. Ragatang

    I prefer what he's selling than what other clowns are selling.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:39 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • ArizonaYankee

      Takes a rangatang to know a rangatang. To bad you are a commie also...He is destroying our republic, and you love it.....What a moron.

      January 25, 2012 at 5:44 pm | Report abuse |
  9. Tired-of-the-same-ole-redneck-rhetoric

    So have we heard anything from these Republican candidates except for inadvertent racial bashing, ambiguious statements and un-detailed promises. I would say that Ron Paul is the only one that makes some kind of sense. Enough sense to be dangerous. These candidates will say and do anything to get in the White House.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:39 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  10. ArizonaYankee

    He is a toxic, narcissistic, racist, liar. Having learned that in his first year, why would any reasonable, rational person believe a word this socialist says, regardless of your political affiliation.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:39 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • James R. Ruston

      Clearly, Arizona, your understanding of narcissism and socialism leaves much to be desired. In fact, you wouldn't know a socialist if one bit you on the behind and you are confusing self confidence with narcissism. There is no evidence he is a racist, unlike a good number of the teapartiers, and I would like for you to supply one lie from the speech that you can prove is a lie. Just one

      January 25, 2012 at 5:46 pm | Report abuse |
  11. mij

    Not for a minute. Obama GTFO... You can't multiply wealth by dividing it.....The Govt. can't give to antbody anything, the Govt. does not first take away from someone else.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:39 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • ddblah

      Really? have you been in an airport, stadium, or driving on a road, or going to a public school, or asking for help from a police officer, or, ...., asking for social security benefit when you are laid off?

      No? None of the above? Hnn..., are you sure you live on Earth?

      January 25, 2012 at 5:46 pm | Report abuse |
  12. The King

    His policies are that of a moderate republican of 30 years ago. So, for the most part I support what he's tryiing to do. But, the PAC's that own the GOP have strict instructions to obstruct, counter, and if possible prevent any economic recovery at every turn. Who needs Al Qaeda, the republican party is by far a bigger threat to the working class of the USA.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:40 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  13. Jariv

    No, don't buy it. I bought it before, but no more.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:40 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  14. Mike

    So, Obama gets run out of office... HORRAY! You win!!!!! ... now what? psh.. f*$k#n losers you have no clue.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:40 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Mike

      see Peter's explanation below. exactly

      January 25, 2012 at 5:46 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Peter

    Obama did a great job in the address last night. But more than just last night, it is becoming clearer and clearer that Obama's policies work and that more could have been done if it hadn't been for so much Republican obstruction (the party that actually had the nerve to declare that their mission is to defeat this president rather than work productively with him to solve our problems that they created.) What is mind boggling is that anyone would want to elect a Republican who will continue to throw this country off a cliff. I think we've had enough of that cr@p.

    January 25, 2012 at 5:40 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • urouttolunch

      well said

      January 25, 2012 at 5:42 pm | Report abuse |
    • Chris

      You mean sort of like how Obama has failed work with the Republicans to further their agendas? Sorry kid, this is a two way street. You can't whine about how Republicans are being obstructionist without acknowledging the fact that Obama is doing the same thing from his end.

      January 25, 2012 at 5:46 pm | Report abuse |
    • Sam

      Hello???!!! Obama put us another 5 trillion in debt! HELLO???? MCFLY? At this point no one in the running can do the job and neither can Obama

      January 25, 2012 at 6:02 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.