As members of Georgia’s House of Representatives debate whether to prohibit abortions for women more than 20 weeks pregnant, House Democrats introduced their own reproductive rights plan: No more vasectomies that leave "thousands of children ... deprived of birth."
Rep. Yasmin Neal, a Democrat from the Atlanta suburb of Jonesboro, planned on Wednesday to introduce HB 1116, which would prevent men from vasectomies unless needed to avert serious injury or death.
The bill reads: "It is patently unfair that men avoid the rewards of unwanted fatherhood by presuming that their judgment over such matters is more valid than the judgment of the General Assembly. ... It is the purpose of the General Assembly to assert an invasive state interest in the reproductive habits of men in this state and substitute the will of the government over the will of adult men."
“If we legislate women’s bodies, it’s only fair that we legislate men’s,” said Neal, who said she wanted to write bill that would generate emotion and conversation the way anti-abortion bills do. “There are too many problems in the state. Why are you under the skirts of women? I’m sure there are other places to be."
Personally, Neal said, she has no qualms with vasectomies.
“But even if it were proposed as a serious issue,” she said, “it’s still not my place as a woman to tell a man what to do with his body."
The anti-vasectomy bill was a response to a bill that would punish abortions performed after the 20th week of pregnancy with prison sentences between one and 10 years. Georgia law currently prohibits abortion after the second trimester, except to preserve the life and health of the mother. Neal's bill borrows some language directly from the anti-abortion bill.
The anti-abortion bill makes exceptions to avert death or “serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function” of the mother, but doesn’t include “diagnosis or claim of a mental or emotional condition.” If an abortion occurs after the 20th week, the bill requires doctors to attempt to deliver a living baby.
Earlier discussions about the bill have been “outstanding,” said Rep. Doug McKillip, a Republican from Athens, Georgia, who introduced the anti-abortion bill this month. He said legislators are “drilling down" on questions about when a fetus can feel pain and what exceptions can allow abortions later in pregnancy, and he expects more testimony late this week.
“I’m just disappointed in my colleague, that they would take this opportunity to make light of a very important topic,” McKillip said. “I believe this is a serious topic deserving of serious debate. It feels like a poor attempt at humor.”
Neal said she's serious about making legislators recognize women's rights to make private decisions about their bodies.
"I hope that through the madness this has caused, it gets him to understand where the woman is coming from," she said. "There are a number of women in other states trying the same ploys we’re trying here."
Earlier this month, Democratic Oklahoma Sen. Constance Johnson added – then withdrew – a provision to an anti-abortion bill that read "any action in which a man ejaculates or otherwise deposits semen anywhere but in a woman's vagina shall be interpreted and construed as an action against an unborn child." The state Senate passed the bill this month.
In January, as the Virginia state Senate debated a bill that required women to have an ultrasound before an abortion, Democrat Janet Howell attached an amendment that required men to have rectal exams and cardiac stress tests before they could receive prescriptions for erectile dysfunction medication like Viagra. The amendment was rejected in the Senate, 21-19.
CNN affiliate WAVY reported that hundreds gathered this week to protest the ultrasound bill, which is up for a vote in Virginia's House of Delegates, and another that says life begins at conception.
On the Georgia House floor, Neal doesn't anticipate her anti-vasectomy bill will generate much serious debate.
"If it moves anywhere," she said, "that’ll be a very interesting day."
comparing Vesectomies to Abortions has to be the dumbest thing I have ever heard of....Apples and oranges.
vesectomy = hesterectomy
georgia democrats = dumb
Hahahaha, I think it's AMAZING :D
Nope..totally valid and glad she did it. It's about control. Ever see that Monty Python spoof "every sperm is sacred"??? We should start taking that very seriously! For every drop that doesn't lead to a child..there should be jail time!
And compareing Access to Contraceptives to abortion is just as stupid
but isn't that what the catholic church is doing wit the full voice of the republicans.
Point is that a woman or a man should have the right to decide these things not the government
YOU GO GIRL!! Give those wretched politicians a taste of their own medicine. I hope John Steward picks up on this bill.
Why is this newsworthy, there is an undeniably huge distincition between a procedure that prevents conception and one that is post conception. Stupid liberals, this is not even a close comparison.
Birth control is a responsible social and spiritual choice. The fact that legislators want to remove what is ultimately the least invasive, single most effective method does not represent a spiritual ideation, but a political agenda. Any politician who can support this legislation while uttering anything about freedom is grossly hypocritical. This is about the state controlling the lives of the people. China has been controlling reproductive freedom for decades in the opposite way. How many here have decried their efforts as draconian.
Read the article one more time... it's not a serious bill, it's meant to point out the hypocrisy of legislating what women can do with their bodies but not men. From the article: "...But even if it were proposed as a serious issue,” she said, “it’s still not my place as a woman to tell a man what to do with his body."
Interesting argument. I would also say that Viagra be outlawed. If men cannot perform, they should accept it as God's will.
Someone, I believe in Texas, tried to get something passed that would force men to have a prostate and full medical exam before being prescribed Viagra. It was in response to a bill that forces women to watch an ultrasound at their cost before getting an abortion. I like the approach. Keep it up, girls.
I love it !!! You are so right! I think it should be illegal for men over 65 to get ED pills since it can be proven that sperm of men that age can result in birth defects. Besides which, at my age, I'm tired of the old fart not letting me get any sleep.
LOVE IT! LOVE IT! LOVE IT!
The two are not equivalent. Vasectomies and tubal ligation are sterilization procedures. Abortion is an invasive termination to a life. It should NEVER be used as birth control. That's what birth control is for – to PREVENT pregnancy, not end it because you decided to be irresponsible. Yeah we live in an instant gratification society, but look where lack of foresight has gotten our economy! You can't punish or cause pain to another human because you "oopsed" – that's wreckless endangerment and manslaughter outside the womb. Self defense is one thing, but killing someone so you don't have to deal with them is murder. The difference is a few months of age. I'm sorry, but this legislation is a waste of taxpayer money and correlates two unrelated medical procedures in some extreme misguided satire.
No one uses abortion as BIRTH CONTROL. That argument has to stop right now.
If one doesn't grasp the concept of what this woman is doing, one shouldn't comment.
If one is not female, one should not have a say in legislation of any sort concerning females reproduction.
This whole argument (choice vs. no choice) and men's participation in it is just their way of gaining some power and control over women because men lack a womb.... no way....ever...that they could ever have a baby. Women don't need men to have babies anymore...nothing more than a sperm donation needed. Men can't stand the fact that women have the ability to give life to another. So, they want to insert themselves again into the equation.... Men, women do not need you! Get over it.
The X chromosome is dying out and will not exist in another 200,000 years or so. No men, then.
Sorry, Y chromosome is dying out. = no men
Yep. The huwoman race just needs to develop the technology to keep sperm donations viable for eons....and we are set!!!
Well since the worl is going to end in Dec. this year who cares. They will still be argueing till then
@momoya, though it is true that the Y chromosome has degraded significantly in over millions of years of our evolution, recent studies by scientists on this matter suggest that the Y chromosome's shedding of genetic material has seen to have stopped.
The comments here just back up what I thought while reading this article: those at whom the irony of this bill is aimed are just too stupid to get it. There's simply no way to get through to these people, and cleverness in any form is certainly not going to do the trick.
This woman has been drinking too much of the koolaid. I have never heard of anything as outrageous as this.
Really? Nothing as outrageous as this? How about men proposing legislation to prevent a woman from choosing to have or not have a baby?
They aren't doing that. That's just how your phrasing it to whine about your want of killing things. Any woman can have an abortion. Would you like it if they could kill children too, I think you would.
Jane, look up irony.
Then get back to us.
vesectomy = hesterectomy
georgia democrats = dumb
speaking of dumb cnn does not allow the 'does not equal" sign
I knew this was coming.. first they want to retrict what women do with their bodies and now men Roe-v-Wade will continue to haunt our nation.. No one has ANYright to tell a Woman or Man what to do with their bodies... If PRO lifers are so adamant about the life of an unborn, then they should feed the child care for it, and educate it for its first 18 years... Lets see how that goes... Too many children are born to unwanting parents that should have gone thru an abortion.(Sad yes..but true).. If the social services system was not so ridicuously convoluted, then adoptions would flurish...instead its not about the welfare of a human being, but about how much money can be sucked out of a couple who deperately wants a child. A person wanting an abortion is being responsible even though they did not take the measures to prevent the pregnancy.
This isn't serious, it's meant to as a response to the Birth Control legislation.
A vasectomy limit would be the same as a tubal ligation limit. It's not the same as an abortion limit (which I disagree with BTW), so these politicians are off the mark - as usual.
...a group of men dictating what a population of women can/cannot do inside their uteri...As soon as they give me rule over their testicles, I'll allow them to vote on my girly bits... GROW up America and mind your own private parts!!!!
Hey Republicans: Stop your false accusations that Obama is trying to control everyone's life and GET THE HELL OUT OF MY BEDROOM!!!
Maybe she never heard of tubal ligation.
Great idea! Let's castrate all Democrats and get this reproductive rights issue "fixed". Bill Clinton would have left a clean Oval Office floor! Obama is correct. Require all Democrat women to have abortions. Give all forms of contraceptives to Democrats. The fewer the better. This is just like a mosquito abatement program ;-)
Democrats are the only thing stopping Republicans from going hog wild and killing everyone and everything around them. It's in their nature to destroy.
This blog – This Just In – will no longer be updated. Looking for the freshest news from CNN? Go to our ever-popular CNN.com homepage on your desktop or your mobile device, and join the party at @cnnbrk, the world's most-followed account for news.