Oh, Zuck: Facebook's bumpy start just got a little worse
May 23rd, 2012
11:55 AM ET

Oh, Zuck: Facebook's bumpy start just got a little worse

To say its been a rough ride for Facebook's IPO would be an understatement.

And as the social media giant edges toward the close of its first week of trading, questions are swirling about the company's valuation, its profitability and now allegations that full details of the stock's likely value were shared with only a select group of people.

Did some people get a heads-up Facebook's IPO wasn't what it seemed?

Regulators are now looking into the possibility that Facebook's Wall Street investment banks may have tipped off some clients that Facebook wasn't necessarily a great buy or worth the hype it was receiving, according to reports Wednesday from Reuters and several other news organizations.

“Facebook changed the numbers – they didn’t forecast their business right and they changed their numbers and told analysts,” a person at one of Facebook’s banks told Reuters.

Overheard on CNN.com 'I saw this one coming from a mile away'

The big question is: Did certain privileged customers receive information about the Facebook offering that you as an individual investor might not have?

Rick Ketchum, head of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, an independent regulatory body, acknowledged in an article from Reuters that a Morgan Stanley analyst reduced his revenue projections for Facebook shortly before the offering and shared the information with institutional investors.

And now Facebook shareholders have filed a lawsuit against the social network, CEO Mark Zuckerberg and a number of banks, alleging that crucial information was concealed ahead of Facebook's IPO. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan on Wednesday morning, charges the defendants with failing to disclose in the critical days leading up to Friday's initial public offering "a severe and pronounced reduction."

Facebook  defended themselves on Wednesday saying they "believe the lawsuit is without merit and will defend ourselves vigorously."

The report, and now the lawsuit, raises questions about whether Morgan Stanley, one of the underwriter companies that handled Facebook's IPO, or other banks knowingly offered certain investors privileged information that should have been made public. Other underwriters targeted by the lawsuit include Barclays Capital, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Merrill Lynch, a unit of Bank of America.

It is possible that Morgan Stanley may have signed off on a price that was too high or agreed to sell too many shares in the deal, CNNMoney.com reports. Then, Morgan Stanley analysts are alleged to have told certain people they had a negative assessment of the social network's offering.

"If true, the allegations are a matter of regulatory concern to FINRA and the [Securities and Exchange Commission]," Ketchum said in a statement via a spokeswoman.

The New York Times reported Morgan Stanley did more than just quietly share a negative outlook; they actually "held conference calls to update their banks' analysts on business."

"Analysts at Morgan Stanley and other firms soon started advising clients to dial back their expectations," the article says. "One prospective buyer was told that second-quarter revenue could be 5 percent lower than the bank’s earlier estimates."

Sallie Krawcheck, Bank of America's former head of wealth management, took to Twitter to share her outrage about the allegations.

A glitch leaves investors not knowing if they have Facebook stock

Facebook's debut on the market was hindered by early confusion when trading was delayed by two hours after what Nasdaq called a "technical error."

"People didn't know where their orders stood, and it became a big guessing game," one trader, who had put in an order to buy Facebook shares ahead of the opening bell, told CNNMoney.com. "Nasdaq couldn't handle it - they blew it."

The trader said he didn't receive a report of how many shares he bought and how much he paid for them until three hours after his order was executed. Typically, that report is transmitted instantaneously, he said.

Facebook IPO: What went wrong?

Others were left even further in the dark. A frustrated 11-year-old investor, who in many ways represents the most basic frustration for individual investors, told the New York Post that three days after the public debut, he had absolutely no idea if he even had gotten shares of the company. 

“They are holding my money hostage,” said Sam Lesser, who had put in a $10,000 Facebook order from money he made in a small business he created. "It’s really disappointing, because we could have made money on this."

To prevent a repeat of Facebook's botched opening, Nasdaq has changed its process to no longer accept order modifications once the final calculation has begun.

Stock disappointing many - unless you're a flipper

If you bought Facebook hoping it would be a steady earner in the early days, you were certainly out of luck.

While the Facebook IPO was one of the most highly anticipated IPOs in recent memory, setting a record for first-day trading volume, it's also been quite a disappointment so far.

The stock is still down about 15 and has yet to post a truly positive trading session. On Friday the stock had a minute gain, but other than that, it hasn't done much to impress early investors.

That is, of course, unless you're someone looking to trade minute-by-minute or hour-by-hour in order to turn a real quick profit.

"It's a day trader's paradise right now," Douglas DePietro, managing director for sales trading and trading execution at Evercore Partners, told CNNMoney.com. "There's high volatility and high volume."

soundoff (772 Responses)
  1. Eric

    Caveat emptor.

    May 23, 2012 at 1:55 pm | Report abuse |
  2. TomGI

    It figures he was crooked. Not surprised one bit. He will try to find a scapegoat to blame and emerge as pristine. It's their way.

    May 23, 2012 at 1:56 pm | Report abuse |
  3. Think about it...

    FB is not worth more than Target, Starbucks, Dell, Disney...even though the stock price/outstanding shares indicates otherwise...use your brain!

    May 23, 2012 at 1:56 pm | Report abuse |
  4. rec

    LOOK FOR $9 A SHARE VERY SOON. THE HYPE CAN'T HOLD THIS PIG UP MUCH LONGER!

    May 23, 2012 at 1:56 pm | Report abuse |
  5. lee miller kauai

    ...uh-oh...egg on our facebook...

    May 23, 2012 at 1:56 pm | Report abuse |
  6. joe B

    I could tell it was overvalued and my economics training is limited to Economics 101 as a college freshman!!!!!

    May 23, 2012 at 1:56 pm | Report abuse |
  7. JC

    Attention! There's a REASON why it's called speculation. Anyone who wasn't absolutely certain that this stock would immediately drop in value should not be buying stock at all! This is a company whose only recent market increases have been in assurances and hype! The problem ISN'T that the big holders were alerted ahead of time. The problem is that we have allowed trades to occur anywhere, through other mechanisms besides the wild capitalism of the pit floor! The problem is that there is no separation between banks and brokers! The one thing that needed to change BACK, and it didn't happen. Angry about the 1% who did know? You shouldn't be. It wouldn't happen if you weren't paid off or stupid.

    May 23, 2012 at 1:56 pm | Report abuse |
  8. the_dude

    None of this will matter once the zombies come on Dec 21 2012.

    May 23, 2012 at 1:56 pm | Report abuse |
  9. JIm

    Wait – some people were not told that Facebook might not live up to it's hype?

    An 11-year old cannot figure out if he purchased stock?

    SHOCKING revelations!

    May 23, 2012 at 1:57 pm | Report abuse |
  10. SBrown

    I'm not surprised the IPO price was way overvalued, and that millions of suckers bought it anyway.

    May 23, 2012 at 1:57 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Jeff

    How many friends dislike Facebook now?

    May 23, 2012 at 1:57 pm | Report abuse |
  12. Malibu123

    And why would FB be considered a great company to invest in anyway, of course it's overvalued.

    May 23, 2012 at 1:58 pm | Report abuse |
  13. EVN

    When foxes guard the hen house the hens get eaten. And the worst part is it is Wall Street that ultimately controls most of our retirement assets, so we are the hens fattening the foxes and their guard(ian)s.

    Honestly, integrity and fair play are aliens on Wall Street. But don't expect the government to do anything meaningful about it, and the financial circus will go on.

    May 23, 2012 at 1:58 pm | Report abuse |
  14. FBIAJ

    It's about time we had a Lynching!! Racism Max? Ur High....michelle, why feel sorry for the Jew..FB is hype and it's high time the greedy trolls get it up their keisters!!

    May 23, 2012 at 1:58 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Ouch

    zuckers

    May 23, 2012 at 1:58 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38