This Just In
When Olympic athletes succeed but judges fail
Aly Raisman celebrates with her coach after an appeal of her balance beam score earned her a bronze medal.
August 8th, 2012
01:05 PM ET

When Olympic athletes succeed but judges fail

When U.S. gymnast Aly Raisman completed her routine on the balance beam during the individual finals Tuesday, she hugged her coach and stared at the scoreboard, waiting to see whether she had done enough to medal.

When the score finally flashed, a nervous Raisman became disappointed.

"Oh, no!" her coach, Mihai Brestyan, proclaimed as he spotted the eerily familiar results.

She had landed in fourth place – again – and just shy of the medal stand for the second time in the Olympics.

What happened next would again thrust the judges, athletes and coaches into a heated debate over Olympic scoring.

As Raisman tried to hold back her disappointment, shouts came from the crowd. U.S. national team coordinator Martha Karolyi, her husband, Bela (who is no longer associated with Team USA but is a constant fixture), and vice president of USA women's gymnastics Kathy Kelly shouted and motioned for Brestyan to file a protest.

They believed that the judges hadn't accurately tabulated her difficulty score, specifically the connections between a few of her elements on the beam. Brestyan raced around the gym to get a form to fill out in the allotted time. Meanwhile, Raisman congratulated Catalina Ponor of Romania, who was in position for bronze.

Raisman and Team USA anxiously stared at the scoreboard as judges from the International Gymnastics Federation reviewed video of her routine.

"It might be a tie," Raisman said: a repeat of the all-around finals. Raisman had tied Russia's Aliya Mustafina, which in the all-around means the lowest score was dropped. Raisman, long seen as the rock of the team, had narrowly missed an individual medal because of the tiebreaker rule. She was worried it would happen again.

And Raisman was right, it was a tie. But her coach quickly reminded her she would end up on the podium because the execution scores alone, not the difficulty, were judged in the tiebreaker.

The scoreboard flashed the official result. The tiebreaker went in Raisman's favor this time, and she received a bronze medal.

It was perhaps one of the longest moments of Raisman's career. But it was not the first time this chaotic scene had played out in the Olympics - or questions about the accuracy of judging had come up.

For years, debate has stirred about how accurately sports can be judged, especially in the Olympics. Many have argued that everything is subjective. And in a sport that comes down to hundredths of a point, that can be everything. As Raisman knows, it can also be the difference between being an Olympic medalist and missing out entirely.

That is part of the reason the inquiry system Raisman's coach used was instituted.

"The inquiry was introduced along with FIG's new scoring system following the 2004 Olympics, where judging disasters marred the men's all-around and high bar finals. (The inquiry replaced an appeals process, which had a far lower rate of overturning scores at the 2004 Olympics, at least)," Nick Zaccardi wrote in a Sports Illustrated column explaining the system, using the acronym for the International Gymnastics Federation. "The FIG did away with the perfect 10 and redid its 'code of points' system with the more complicated two-pronged approach. The benefits of the change included eliminating potential bias in judging, the FIG said in 2005. Video review was also introduced."

Team USA's use of the inquiry in Raisman's case was the third in gymnastics during this Olympics alone.

Japan made a similar request over Kohei Uchimura's score on the pommel horse during the men's team finals.

Uchimura, one of the best men's gymnasts and a hero in his home country, was seen as a lock to propel Japan to a medal. But after his score was shown on the screen, it seemed Japan would be left off the podium. The scores placed China with the gold, Great Britain with the silver and Ukraine with the bronze. Japan, like Raisman, sat in fourth.

NBC: Watch the video

As commentators on NBC wondered whether "the greatest gymnast of our time dropped the ball," the camera quickly panned to the judges' table, where a Japanese coach was seen with money in his hand, filling out an inquiry form. FIG requires a payment of $300 to file an appeal. If the score is overturned, the money is returned.

Japan claimed that Uchimura had also been overlooked in the scoring: specifically, that he did connect a handstand before his dismount.

Japan challenged the score given to gymnast Kohei Uchimura on the pommel horse during the men's team final.

An announcement came in Japan's favor. It was one that greatly altered the standings. Ukraine was left without a medal, and the host nation was now taking home the bronze, something the home crowd was clearly displeased about.

During the men’s all-around competition, Germany's Fabian Hambuchen's pommel horse score was also protested, but the committee rejected the appeal.

The nature of scoring in gymnastics, similar to figure skating, has been debated as largely subjective despite attempts to correct concerns through recent FIG changes.

That's something Romania's Ponor, who lost out on a medal after Raisman's challenge, and her coach now know all too well. Ponor's face went from excitement to disappointment in the course of a few minutes. Coach Yuliy Kuksenkov who said after the ruling that "life is life," perhaps best capturing many people's thoughts regarding the routine disagreements about scoring.

"In athletics, 100 meters is just 100 meters," Sports Illustrated quoted him as saying. "Sometimes in gymnastics, it's 95 meters or 105 meters."

It's not all about gymnastics, though.

A scoring controversy in fencing last week left South Korea's Shin A-Lam in tears - and left her refusing to leave the piste. She appealed to judges over a delayed and stuck clock that had resulted in extra points being awarded to Britta Heidemann of Germany. Had she left the piste during the appeal, it would have signaled she agreed with the judges.

YouTube: A Lego re-enactment with the play-by-play, created by The Guardian

The South Korean was photographed sitting in the same spot for more than 70 minutes as she awaited the appeal and then refused to leave after it was handed down. She was finally escorted off the stage, sobbing.

South Korea's Shin A-Lam was finally escorted off in tears.

"I did everything I could," Shin told Reuters after the match. "They said 'your fencer has to continue the match,' so I had to accept the decision."

Accepting the decision may be part of it, but so is being prepared and willing to fight for the scores you believe are deserved.

U.S. gymnast Jordyn Wieber's coach told Sports Illustrated that he kept a filled-out inquiry form with him, just in case.

But as Raisman, Brestyan, Ponor, Uchimura, Shin and others know: It's an imperfect two-sided coin. You have to know when to make the call and be able to do it quickly in gymnastics, and sometimes you just fall on the wrong side of the ruling.

"I agree with the system," Brestyan said, according to Sports Illustrated. "The system sometimes helps. Sometimes not."

soundoff (574 Responses)
  1. fox

    What about CHEN Yibing in Men's Ring where he couldn't even appeal?

    August 9, 2012 at 3:27 am | Report abuse | Reply
  2. JG

    Awww please don't cry sad Asian girl.

    August 9, 2012 at 3:35 am | Report abuse | Reply
  3. Faxon

    Olympic judges are arrogant members of "the Olympic Family". There's one or more in every family.

    August 9, 2012 at 3:36 am | Report abuse | Reply
    • AF Whigs

      Right. THe whole IOC is corrupt and imperious and bloated with self importance. So who's to say the judges are any better?

      August 9, 2012 at 7:23 am | Report abuse |
  4. Raider

    Amazingly this article completely fails to mention the Canada vs US women's soccer travesty.

    August 9, 2012 at 4:09 am | Report abuse | Reply
    • Winterer

      This is about panel judged sports, not ones with a ref.

      August 9, 2012 at 5:58 am | Report abuse |
    • Dave

      The Canadian vs USA match would have been much different if Tancredi was given a red card for her stamp on Lloyd's head in the 53rd minute. Everyone seems to forget that she got away with assualt during the match. The refs missed that very easy call. Just because a rule is not enforced that much does not mean that it can't be enforced when there is an obvious attempt to cheat using that very rule.

      August 9, 2012 at 6:36 am | Report abuse |
    • shadowdiver

      I watched that game. What are you whining about:?

      August 9, 2012 at 7:06 am | Report abuse |
    • canucken

      Thank you for pointing that out. Canada was completely ripped off in that decision.

      August 9, 2012 at 7:09 am | Report abuse |
    • Vad

      I agree with Dave. The American girl got her head stomped. Guess that's ok with our friends to the North though. Maybe the refs missed a call against the Americans but that head stomp was even worse than when Shu from the Lions stomped on the Packers Lineman's arm. I wouldn't complain too loud if I were a Canadian Eh!

      August 9, 2012 at 7:10 am | Report abuse |
    • jR

      I believe the U.S. won the game according to the rules, fairly!!!

      August 9, 2012 at 7:43 am | Report abuse |
  5. Summer

    This article missed a lot of mis-judges at this olympics. So many "appeal" happened..

    August 9, 2012 at 4:58 am | Report abuse | Reply
  6. korean

    IM KOREAN .1MUNITE is very long time,and Shin is very sad.I think.......................

    August 9, 2012 at 5:52 am | Report abuse | Reply
  7. Stay Wimi

    Poor Shin, but what an honour to be re-enacted and immortalised by Lego..
    We've been immortalising Olympians in our Daily Rap Up
    http://bit.ly/olmVd

    August 9, 2012 at 6:27 am | Report abuse | Reply
  8. Numonly

    If someone feels so sad when see the poor Korean girl cry, think about Roy Jones Jr. in Olympic 1988, you should be better.

    August 9, 2012 at 6:51 am | Report abuse | Reply
  9. slupdawg

    The judges in boxing were simply pathetic this year.

    August 9, 2012 at 7:03 am | Report abuse | Reply
  10. Glewis

    The Woman's US soccer team should thank the ref for her two illegal calls. To bad there wasn't a procedure to reverse those calls on the pitch?

    August 9, 2012 at 7:29 am | Report abuse | Reply
    • jR

      Maybe the U.S. womens' team should play like their opponents, punch and kick whenever they feel like it!!

      August 9, 2012 at 7:47 am | Report abuse |
  11. Motz

    This article is about the use of influence in deciding who gets what medal regardless of performance. The Karolyis are a pair of sneaky foxes that know all the tricks and moves that can be done to squeeze the judges for more points. That's why they are still on US national team payroll. When performance is not good enough, bring the secret weapon, the Karolyis. Should another nation, with less muscle behind filled a complained, I'm pretty sure the decision would have stayed the same. At least they should have awarded medals to both Ponor and Raisman. Shame!

    August 9, 2012 at 8:08 am | Report abuse | Reply
  12. Derek

    The real question is... Replace scoring/judging with what?
    The new system is obviously better than the old one.. but how to improve it?

    August 9, 2012 at 8:08 am | Report abuse | Reply
  13. ME

    I personally believe Catalina Ponor of Romania got shafted.
    She was not only awesome on the balance beam but she was the very very best on the mat...
    USA's gymnast was very good but she was absolutely in no way any better that Catalina.

    August 9, 2012 at 8:26 am | Report abuse | Reply
  14. ME

    If a tie...then both need to get the medals..
    Catalina...you are a Fantastic Gymnast!!!

    August 9, 2012 at 8:27 am | Report abuse | Reply
  15. Knotty Boy

    Judges and officials of the "Olympic Committee" are little copies of the neutered, ineffective organization of the United Nations... which, of course, is the most infuriatingly "PC" organization in the world. There is hardly a thing "impartial" about them.

    August 9, 2012 at 9:02 am | Report abuse | Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.