Mutant butterflies a result of Fukushima nuclear disaster, researchers say
This image from a study on Fukushima's impact on butterflies shows wings mutated by the radiation.
August 14th, 2012
10:35 AM ET

Mutant butterflies a result of Fukushima nuclear disaster, researchers say

In the first sign that the Fukushima nuclear disaster may be changing life around it, scientists say they've found mutant butterflies.

Some of the butterflies had abnormalities in their legs, antennae, and abdomens, and dents in their eyes, according to the study published in Scientific Reports, an online journal from the team behind Nature. Researchers also found that some affected butterflies had broken or wrinkled wings, changes in wing size, color pattern changes, and spots disappearing or increasing on the butterflies.

The study began two months after an earthquake and tsunami devastated swaths of northeastern Japan in March 2011, triggering a nuclear disaster. The Fukushima Daiichi plant spewed radiation and displaced tens of thousands of residents from the surrounding area in the worst nuclear accident since the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine.

In May 2011, researchers collected more than 100 pale grass blue butterflies in and around the Fukushima prefecture and found that 12% of them had abnormalities or mutations. When those butterflies mated, the rate of mutations in the offspring rose to 18%, according to the study, which added that some died before reaching adulthood. When the offspring mated with healthy butterflies that weren't affected by the nuclear crisis, the abnormality rate rose to 34%, indicating that the mutations were being passed on through genes to offspring at high rates even when one of the parent butterflies was healthy.

The scientists wanted to find out how things stood after a longer amount of time and again collected more than 200 butterflies last September. Twenty-eight percent of the butterflies showed abnormalities, but the rate of mutated offspring jumped to 52%, according to researchers. The study indicated that second-generation butterflies, the ones collected in September, likely saw higher numbers of mutations because they were exposed to the radiation either as larvae or earlier than adult butterflies first collected.

To make sure that the nuclear disaster was in fact the cause of the mutations, researchers collected butterflies that had not been affected by radiation and gave them low-dose exposures of radiation and found similar results.

"We conclude that artificial radionuclides from the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant caused physiological and genetic damage to this species," the study said.

The results of the study bring up concerns about the larger impact of the Fukushima disaster and the impact it will have on the ecosystem in Japan and nearby areas, as well as what we can learn for future nuclear disasters.

"Our results are consistent with the previous field studies that showed that butterfly populations are highly sensitive to artificial radionuclide contamination in Chernobyl and Fukushima," the study said. "Together, the present study indicates that the pale grass blue butterfly is probably one of the best indicator species for radionuclide contamination in Japan."

One of the researchers, Joji Otaki, an associate professor at the University of the Ryukyus in Okinawa, told reporters that while butterflies may be the best indicator, the study should also lead to more research on what else may be affected by the radiation.

"Sensitivity (to irradiation) varies between species, so research should be conducted on other animals," Otaki told the Japan Times.

Otaki said while there is still plenty of research to be done on radiation, there shouldn't be large-scale concern about this kind of mutation in humans.

"Humans are totally different from butterflies and they should be far more resistant" to radiation, he told the newspaper.

Read more:

Inside Fukushima's meltdown zone

What Fukushima did to the ocean

Gallery: Then and now

Post by:
Filed under: 2011 tsunami • Animals • Insects • Japan
soundoff (316 Responses)
  1. Marc

    Butterflies? Shouldn't they be looking for mutations in lizards? Godzilla!!!

    August 14, 2012 at 1:41 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  2. serdich

    No such thing as evolution or survival of the fittest..

    August 14, 2012 at 1:45 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  3. Bubba

    If it's being passed on through genes, it's not radiation...it's evolution.

    August 14, 2012 at 1:51 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  4. Whome

    Am I missing something, where are the photos?

    August 14, 2012 at 1:55 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  5. sonobono

    what a total and unexpected shock...NOT

    August 14, 2012 at 1:57 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  6. saywhat

    Thanks @ Tesla.
    Those studies on Falujah mutants must be wrong. The defects are occuring probably from some 'cultural' going ons.
    Oh ! Those Arabs.

    August 14, 2012 at 1:58 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Tesla

      Or, it could be due to any number of effects from the non-environmentally friendly businesses and operations in the area, ranging from oil operations, heavy metals from mining runoff, or other chemical weapons that could be carcinogenic or mutagenic. You know, the kind of stuff that goes on in the armpit of the world.

      DU Penetrators would not give off enough radiation to cause mutations in a human, even a fetus. White phosporus is not radioactive or mutagenic. These are facts. The pollution background of Fallujah is hard to say for certain. I tend to go with facts.

      August 14, 2012 at 2:21 pm | Report abuse |
  7. mendrys

    Simply amazing at the number of deniers on this site. Hmm, a meltdown at a nuclear plant that resulted in expolsions and the release of copious amounts of radioactive materials into the atmosphere and sea resulted in an increased number of mutations in the ecosystem around the area? How preposterous. I wonder who funded these guys, It must be a lie put forth by the evil scientists to further their goals of world assimilation into their Marxist new world order. I get exposed to radiation every day and I don't have cancer so the idea that radiation can cause cancer is certainly a lie isn't it?

    August 14, 2012 at 2:01 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  8. Dean

    Seems like a copy of a Homer Simpson episode – remember the 3 eyed fish. Now heres some breaking news: "Humans are totally different from butterflies and they should be far more resistant" to radiation, he told the newspaper.

    August 14, 2012 at 2:02 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  9. truefax

    pics or it didn't happen

    August 14, 2012 at 2:05 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  10. Burnz

    Photos?

    August 14, 2012 at 2:08 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  11. U.S. Citizen

    My first thought.

    August 14, 2012 at 2:09 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  12. Dan Bednarik

    Same thing happened at Chernobyl - those butterflies are the size of fruit bats now.

    August 14, 2012 at 2:09 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  13. Nick

    This is how Mothra began...

    August 14, 2012 at 2:10 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • David

      My thoughts exactly...

      August 14, 2012 at 2:37 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Drop_bear

    Don't worry...the vegetables are safe to eat. They told me so themselves!

    August 14, 2012 at 2:13 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  15. toonah

    I, for one, welcome our new butterfly overlords.

    August 14, 2012 at 2:13 pm | Report abuse | Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.