NFL: Refs missed penalty in controversial play, but Seattle victory stands
September 25th, 2012
06:00 PM ET

NFL: Refs missed penalty in controversial play, but Seattle victory stands

Replacement referees missed a penalty that would have rendered moot a controversy over whether a Seattle Seahawks receiver caught a game-winning touchdown pass a moment later, the National Football League said Tuesday.

The Green Bay Packers would have won the game had offensive pass interference been called against Seahawks receiver Golden Tate, but the missed penalty wasn't reviewable. So the officials' controversial on-field ruling that Tate subsequently scored a touchdown by having joint possession of the ball with a Packers defender stands.

The touchdown - which over the last day has become a symbol of player and fan frustration over the NFL's replacement referees - gave Seattle a 14-12 win. "The result of the game is final," the NFL said in a news release Tuesday.

Photos: Blown calls

The NFL also said that it supports a referee's decision, after he reviewed the play Monday night, that no indisputable evidence existed to overturn the on-field ruling that Tate scored.

Commentators on ESPN, which showed the "Monday Night Football" game, questioned whether Tate really caught the ball, penalty or not. The play has sparked a full-open revolt by fans and players over replacement referees, who are standing in for officials that the NFL has locked out during a labor dispute.

"Fine me and use the money to pay the regular refs," Packers guard T.J. Lang tweeted minutes after the game ended, one in a series of profanity-laced tweets accusing the referees of taking the game from his team.

Here's how the play unfolded: With seconds remaining and Seattle down 12-7, Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson threw a deep pass into the end zone. Tate and Packers safety M.D. Jennings went up for the ball, and referees eventually ruled - after officials gave competing signals - that both possessed the ball simultaneously. Under NFL rules, simultaneous possession goes to the offense, so the officials ruled the play a touchdown for Tate with time expired.

Replays, however, showed two potential problems: First, Tate appears to shove Packers defender Sam Shields in the back while the ball is in the air, a move that normally would draw an offensive pass interference penalty. Second, the footage appears to show Jennings first having both arms wrapped around the ball while Tate had one arm on it, so simultaneous possession appears questionable. The ball eventually was pulled tight to Jennings' chest.

The referees reviewed the play, and let it stand, giving Seattle the win.

The NFL essentially said Tuesday that the Packers should have won because Tate should have been called for offensive pass interference, "which would have ended the game" with the Packers ahead.

However, a missed offensive pass interference call is not reviewable, the NFL said, so nothing could be done about that part of the play when it was reviewed by referee Wayne Elliott.

As for the ruling on the catch, the NFL said: "Eliott determined that no indisputable visual evidence existed to overturn the call on the field, and as a result, the on-field ruling of touchdown stood."

"The NFL Officiating Department reviewed the video today and supports the decision not to overturn the on-field ruling following the instant replay review," the NFL said Tuesday.

Discussion of the call virtually took over Twitter in the United States and sparked rising calls for the NFL to quickly settle its labor dispute with officials.

Packers coach Mike McCarthy declined to specifically address the call in his post-game news conference but said later that he had "never seen anything like that in all my years in football."

See the play in photos | Week 3: Photos

Green Bay quarterback Aaron Rodgers called the officiating "awful."

Coming away with a close win, Seahawks coach Pete Carroll was less critical.

"From what I understand from the officials, it was a simultaneous catch, that's how they called it," Carroll told reporters. "Tag goes to the runner. Good call."

But he said it's sill time for the dispute to end.

"It's a very, very complex process to handle these games and make the decisions, and there's nothing easy about it," he said. "And it takes years and years of experience to pull it off properly and in a timely fashion and to keep the flow of the game alive and all of that, and it's just time for it to be over."

"The league deserves it," Carroll said. "Everybody deserves it."

Controversy over the replacement officials has been simmering since the preseason. A series of missed or muffed calls has riled coaches, players and fans.

On Thursday, the NFL Players Association sent a letter to league owners saying the decision to hire replacement referees "has led to a deteriorating of order, safety and integrity."

"This affirmative decision has not only resulted in poor calls, missed calls and bad game management, but the combination of those deficiencies will only continue to jeopardize player health and safety and the integrity of the game that has taken decades to build," the union wrote.

It's also affecting gamblers. Betters lost an estimated $150 million on the call, gambling expert R.J. Bell said on the gaming website Pregame.com.

Bell also writes that home crowds seem to be influencing officials and that scoring is up from Las Vegas expectations.

The outcry for a resolution appeared to be growing after the Monday night game.

On Tuesday, the website FootballZebras.com, which tracks officiating in the NFL, said the Monday night call was "beyond the tipping point, this is the drowning point."

New Jersey Senate President Steve Sweeney got into the game on Tuesday, saying he would introduce legislation against holding sporting events officiated by replacement referees.

"This past weekend in the NFL has not only made a mockery of a great sport, but shined a very bright light on how important fully trained and professional officiating is to player safety," Sweeney said in a statement released by his office Tuesday morning. "We wouldn't allow a factory or construction site to operate without fully trained supervisors on hand to ensure the safety of employees. Why should we do anything differently when the job site is a playing field?"

Discussion of the game also accounted for at least four of the top 10 topics on Twitter in the United States, where everyday fans and celebrities appeared united in their frustration. Even President Obama weighed in on the issue.

Does this ruin football for you? Share your commentary with CNN iReport.

Stephen A. Smith, never one to keep his opinion close to the vest, let it fly on Twitter throughout the end of the game.

According to Sports Illustrated's Peter King, the two sides in the labor dispute are about $3.3 million apart.

Here's a look at some more of the reaction on Twitter:

That last one might not be an official account.

Regarding the NFL's labor dispute with its regular officials, sticking points include salary issues and changes to the officials' retirement program.

What do you think of the final play, of the game or of the replacement officials?

Click here for the best photos from Week 3 of the NFL season.

soundoff (2,120 Responses)
  1. Jon Hamblen

    It sucked.

    September 25, 2012 at 12:59 am | Report abuse |
    • bspurloc

      the NFL has lost all credibility

      pathetic.

      September 25, 2012 at 1:34 am | Report abuse |
  2. Jon Hamblen

    They sucked.

    September 25, 2012 at 12:59 am | Report abuse |
  3. Joel

    As an NFL fan it was disgusting. The refs should never decide a game like that. On another note you have to feel bad for the human beings who are the refs that all of this backlash is heading towards.

    September 25, 2012 at 1:01 am | Report abuse |
  4. Brandon

    ^
    What that guy said

    September 25, 2012 at 1:01 am | Report abuse |
  5. Tom Haggerty

    The Packers were hosed! I am not a Packer fan but Tate committed blatant pass interference followed by no catch of the ball.because Jennings caught it and had possession!

    September 25, 2012 at 1:01 am | Report abuse |
  6. Tonya Oertel

    I think I'll quit watching football when the outcome is so obviously rigged!

    September 25, 2012 at 1:02 am | Report abuse |
  7. Brent

    These refs are totally incompetent and it is making the league a joke. How are these players going to come out next week with ANY respect for the officials? It is just going to get worse from here on out.

    September 25, 2012 at 1:02 am | Report abuse |
  8. Alanah S

    This game was horrible! I do NOT want to watch another NFL game... Goodell is horrible all he cares about is money... He is losing NFL fans because of these replacement refs he has... Thanks NFL for making me dislike the NFL!

    September 25, 2012 at 1:02 am | Report abuse |
  9. Pete Gee

    The NFL players are union members who cross the picket lines to play games and make millions. The players themselves can't complain about the refs. The players are allowing the game to be ruined by showing up for the games and crossing the picket line.

    September 25, 2012 at 1:03 am | Report abuse |
  10. Tom Silk

    The replacement refs are turning the NFL from a sport into a reality TV show. People are no longer watching to see athletes perform at their peak, but to watch the train wreck the "game" is turning into.

    September 25, 2012 at 1:03 am | Report abuse |
  11. James

    If the owners think they can play without the reg refs lets see if we can hit them where it hurts . The fans need to show who has the power and next week have no one in the stands and no one has their tvs on .

    September 25, 2012 at 1:03 am | Report abuse |
  12. Brittani

    It was clearly an interception by Green Bay!! I am no fan of either teams and wanted to see the Packers lose to the Seahawks, but NOT like that!! That was Green Bays game.

    September 25, 2012 at 1:05 am | Report abuse |
  13. Anonymous 3

    Seahawks won, bitter sweet for me since i'm a hawks fan but not the best way to win..........................

    September 25, 2012 at 1:05 am | Report abuse |
  14. spellfacetious

    Seemed legit to me. I'm not sure what everyone is whining about.

    September 25, 2012 at 1:07 am | Report abuse |
    • Brent

      Are you out of your mind?

      September 25, 2012 at 1:18 am | Report abuse |
    • Vera

      Hey – Tate stripped the ball and got his hands on it, and thats what the ref saw......It is what it is........Packers, suck it up....you should have played a better game anyway.....Go back to the land of cheese.....GO VIKINGS!!!!!

      September 25, 2012 at 7:39 am | Report abuse |
    • bczu

      Tate stripped the ball? What video are you watching?

      September 25, 2012 at 9:04 am | Report abuse |
    • Go Browns

      OFFENSIVE PASS INTERFERENCE......catch does not matter if the flag had been thrown on Tate for the blatant push off..

      September 25, 2012 at 9:34 am | Report abuse |
    • Chris Derry

      Brilliant job of trolling. Look at his username.

      September 25, 2012 at 2:19 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Leslie

    Absolutely ridiculous!! These refs are ruining the game of football for everyone. Sad and disappointing, not to mention unfair....Seahawks got handed a game the Packers won! I've lost a little respect for the NFL today.

    September 25, 2012 at 1:08 am | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87