March 16th, 2010
03:48 PM ET

Activist: Top Irish Catholic ducking blame in abuse case

Ireland's top Catholic cardinal is using the "Nuremberg defense" in the face of public outrage at his role 35 years ago in investigating one of the country's most notorious child-abusing priests, an activist said Tuesday.

Cardinal Sean Brady has been under fire over the investigation into the Rev. Brendan Smyth.

The latest scandal comes on the heels of a huge government-backed report that found the Archdiocese of Dublin and other Catholic Church authorities in Ireland covered up child abuse by priests from 1975 to 2004. Child sexual abuse was "widespread" then, the report found.

Brady's office said Tuesday that the cardinal - then a priest and teacher with a doctorate in canon law - had been asked to investigate two complaints against Smyth in 1975, but had no decision-making power. He reported his findings to Bishop Francis McKiernan, his office said, and McKiernan recommended Smyth get psychiatric help.

But John Kelly, the founder of Irish Survivors of Child Abuse, said Brady should not have remained silent about what he learned in the course of investigating Smyth, who was later convicted of dozens of counts of child abuse in both Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic. He died in prison.

"He's basically using the Nuremberg defense - he was carrying out orders," Kelly said, in reference to the justification many Nazis used in their war crimes trials after World War II.

There has been particular outrage over the revelation that two boys who filed complaints against Smyth were asked to sign confidentiality statements as part of Brady's investigation.

The oaths of secrecy were "to avoid potential collusion" between the two boys as church officials investigated the case, Ireland's Catholic Communications Office said Tuesday.

Despite his criticism of Brady, Kelly said it would not necessarily do any good for the cardinal to resign.

"He's lost all moral authority to lead, but by replacing him, it won't resolve the problem," he said, arguing that the Vatican would "just replace guys with other guys."

The best solution, he said, would be for the Roman Catholic Church to let secular authorities deal with accusations of abuse, rather than trying to handle them itself.

"They have to accept secular authority, and they can get on with the business of religion," Kelly said. "It would be in the church's own interest. Resignations in themselves aren't the answer."

Four Irish bishops tendered their resignations in the wake of the government-backed report, and Pope Benedict XVI is expected to make a formal statement, or pastoral letter, on the Irish abuse issue by Easter.

The pope himself has been under fire since it was revealed that a priest suspected of abusing children was allowed to move into his diocese when he was Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in Germany in 1980.

Post by:
Filed under: Ireland • Religion • World
soundoff (2 Responses)
  1. Mary almi

    Just another example of the widespread cover-up perpetrated by the Catholic Church worldwide. Catholics cannot defend these priests. This scandal is painting the entire church as a haven for criminals.

    March 16, 2010 at 4:58 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Bob Franks

    Actually it is an invalid comparison. Those at Nuremberg who said they were just following orders actually did horrific crimes themselves. This current cardinal at the time years ago had just a minor role – 'investigate this person and send me a report on it' were his orders. There is no crime in that. It is up to the bishop of the day to then act on his findings.

    And by the way, in those days, arrogant psychologists said they could cure pedophilia, but now they say they cannot – shouldn't psychologists be liable for ill advising the bishop back then that the pedophile was cured?

    Let's not lose logic in these emotional events, and place guilt where it belongs.

    March 16, 2010 at 5:44 pm | Report abuse |