March 30th, 2010
05:49 PM ET

Feds: Two aircraft nearly collided over San Francisco

A United Airlines B-777 jetliner came dangerously close to striking a small aircraft over San Francisco on Saturday, with the two planes coming an estimated 200 to 300 feet from each other, according to federal officials who launched an investigation into the incident Tuesday.

The planes came so close that a collision avoidance system sounded, and both pilots of the larger aircraft later reported they could only see the underside of the Cessna 182, a small, single engine aircraft.

The National Transportation Safety Board launched an investigation Tuesday, but said it was too early to suggest whether either aircraft, or air traffic controllers, or some person or factor was to blame.

The NTSB said it learned of the incident because of a three-week-old rule that requires airlines to report to the NTSB any time a plane takes action to avoid a collision because of an alert.

In this circumstance, United Airlines Flight 889 was departing San Francisco International Airport at about 11:15 a.m. Pacific time on a flight to Beijing, China. It was carrying 251 passengers and a crew of 17.

The first officer, who was flying the aircraft, reported the plane was at an altitude of about 1,100 feet when an air traffic controller reported a plane at his 1 o'clock position, the NTSB said. Immediately following the controller's warning, the planes traffic collision avoidance system - or TCAS - issued an audible warning.

The pilots saw the Cessna in a hard left turn traveling from their 1 o'clock to 3 o'clock position.

The first officer of the United plane pushed the control column forward to level the jetliner, and both pilots reported seeing the belly of the Cessna as it passed within 200 to 300 feet of them.

The NTSB said it is sending investigator Scott Dunham to San Francisco to begin the investigation.

Post by:
Filed under: U.S.
soundoff (20 Responses)
  1. Robert Taylor

    Was that a Boeing 777 the copy just says B 777 is a Boeing plane type. So this wasn't an AirBus but a Boeing 777.

    March 30, 2010 at 11:54 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Jesse

    Pete, if the aircraft is VFR (not on an instrument flight plan), the pilot ALWAYS has responsibility to watch for traffic.

    March 31, 2010 at 12:27 am | Report abuse |
  3. nd

    Why ATC wants to play with the life of so many people in the plane I dont understand. People need to take their jobs more seriously.

    March 31, 2010 at 1:09 am | Report abuse |
  4. Kevin

    To Robert,

    The aircraft was a Boeing 777. Why in the world would you think its an Airbus? That's just irrelevant.

    March 31, 2010 at 3:07 pm | Report abuse |
  5. Beto

    I had the privalege to learn to fly is in the bay aea and flown into class B SFO airspace many times. before entering class B the pilot is required to cantact bay aproach and follow instructions from there on traffic separation is controlled by ATC.

    March 31, 2010 at 5:08 pm | Report abuse |
1 2