May 10th, 2010
02:30 PM ET

Security Brief: Analysis: Exploring middle class jihadists

Afghan native Najibullah Zazi confessed to plotting to use weapons of mass destruction in a suicide bomb attack on the New York subway.

They are middle-class, some (by their home country's standards) even well-off. They are often college educated. They are settled in the United States or elsewhere in the West, far from the chaos or sectarian strife of their homelands; they are supposedly "assimilated." But somehow they cast off a life of comfort and drift toward extreme views before embracing political violence inspired by a sense of grievance or alienation.

It is a pattern seen time and again as terrorist plots have been uncovered in the United States. Afghan native Najibullah Zazi; Pakistani-American David Headley; Bryant Neal Vinas, the U.S.-born son of Latino immigrants; and Nigerian student Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, charged with trying to bring down an airliner over Detroit, Michigan, on December 25.

Zazi, who confessed to plotting to use weapons of mass destruction in a suicide bomb attack on the New York subway, was not well-off. But his family was well-established in the United States. His uncle in Denver, Colorado (with whom he lived for part of 2009), owns a spacious house in a pleasant suburb. Zazi attended High School in Flushing, New York, and although religious showed no signs of Islamist militancy as a student. He played billiards and basketball and later ran a coffee-cart business in Wall Street. His patrons described him as likeable, with a ready smile.

Vinas also had a comfortable middle-class upbringing in Long Island and was a baseball fanatic. Neighbors and friends describe him as a courteous, respectful student. Rita Desroches, a neighbor whose son was a good friend of Vinas', describes him as a "very sweet little guy. He could come here any time any minute. Just walk in. He was always welcome."

Abdulmutallab, the young Nigerian who is accused of trying to blow up a U.S. airliner, had a privileged upbringing. He attended one of West Africa's best schools: the British School in Lome. His father is a prominent banker in Nigeria; the family had an expensive apartment in London, England, where Abdulmutallab studied mechanical engineering. He traveled widely - to the United States and the Persian Gulf.  He has pleaded not guilty to charges including attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction.

Headley was born in Pakistan to a distinguished Pakistani diplomat and his American socialite wife. He had a privileged upbringing, attending an elite Pakistani military school and moving easily between the worlds of East and West. But his parents separated when he was a teenager, and he came to live in the U.S. with his mother. He dabbled in the drug trade, working as a courier of heroin from Pakistan to the U.S. until being apprehended in 1998. But even as he ran afoul of the law, there was no sign of Islamist militancy.

The investigation into Times Square suspect Faisal Shahzad's background reveals a similar story. His father is a retired senior Air Force officer in Pakistan, and the family home is in a comfortable suburb of Peshawar. For a while they lived in a two-story villa in Karachi when Shahzad's father was a senior official in the country's aviation authority. Shahzad was well-educated and attended colleges in Pakistan and Bridgeport University in Connecticut. His wife received a degree from the University of Colorado at Boulder and published several books. They purchased a new house in Shelton, Connecticut, and he commuted to work in New York's financial district. He was not a high earner or high performer, according to former employers, but he had a respectable, steady job and two children.

Even Maj. Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood shooting suspect, would hardly be the "stereotypical" jihadist. He was a career soldier, born in Virginia, and a qualified (though apparently not very accomplished) psychiatrist.

Counterterrorism officials and experts on radicalization say that although there are differences in the backgrounds of these men, there are also striking similarities. In some way, they are affected by a change in their personal lives, grievances fed by a sense of injustice, a search for identity or belonging, a sense of alienation from their social environment. Often they are gullible and impressionable.

Vinas - the subject of a series this week on CNN - was traumatized by his parents' separation. CNN Terrorism Contributor Paul Cruickshank, who has spoken with his mother and sister at length, says: "There were tears and temper tantrums. He started quarreling with his sister, being disrespectful to his mother. He refused to accept his parents' separation."

Vinas, according to family and friends, was continually searching for a sense of identity and purpose in his life. After spending a few weeks in the U.S. Army and realizing that a military career was not for him, Vinas was searching for meaning in his life. He found it when he met the brother of a friend who was a Muslim. Vinas asked questions about Islam, and the brother gave him a Quran. Attending a mosque and embracing Islam with the passion of a convert gave him a sense of identity, and he began to believe the grievances of radical Muslims he encountered about U.S. policy overseas and especially in Afghanistan. He ended up booking himself on a flight to Lahore, Pakistan - his aim to join the jihad against U.S. forces over the border.

Carvin Desroches, one of Vinas' best friends growing up, says Vinas was the last of his friends he would have expected would do such a thing. Vinas' mother and sister say that if this happened to their son, they fear it will happen to another American family.

New York Police Department Intelligence Analysis chief Mitch Silber says Vinas "is almost a poster child for the process, the unremarkable nature of the people who might go through this process and frankly the potential to link up to al Qaeda and the danger that presents."

There appears to be no single moment when Zazi was radicalized and no obvious influence on him. But as with Shahzad, he ran into financial difficulties. One customer at his coffee cart told The New York Times that Zazi rebuked her one day. "He told me I could not be happy. He said: 'You people cannot be happy with your money.' "

Zazi filed for bankruptcy in March 2009 with credit card debts of more than $50,000. A few months later, he and two former school-friends left for Pakistan, where Zazi has admitted he received explosives training.

Headley's motivations remain obscure. He appears to have linked up with Pakistani militants while involved with drug trafficking. His dual nationality and ability to move in elite circles were a potent combination with an appetite for adventure and risk. But there were few signs of Islamic militancy, even when he confessed his role in planning the Mumbai attacks by Lashkar-e-Taiba and the plot to bomb the Danish newspaper that had published cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed.

Both Hasan and Abdulmutallab were conflicted over their relationships with women. Hasan's failure to find a wife who would wear a veil haunted him, but at the same time he is said to have visited a strip club near Fort Hood, Texas. Abdulmutallab agonized in his blog entries over finding a "modest" wife. And Anwar al-Awlaki, the Yemeni-American preacher whose views on jihad have influenced so many "home-grown" jihadists, was twice arrested in California for soliciting prostitutes.

Both Hasan and Abdulmutallab appear to have been alienated from their "decadent" surroundings and regarded Western society as morally "flawed."

But the alarming feature for intelligence officials in all these cases is that they defy the likely profile of a terrorist. There is no obvious red flag. These are people who appear to be "ordinary" members of society. They are U.S. citizens or resident aliens (who can therefore move in and out of the country with ease.) They do not belong to readily identifiable radical groups and have not spent their childhoods in radical madrassas.

Many of the home-grown jihadists became loners; family members have no hunch of what they are doing. (This has also been the case with young Somali-Americans who have suddenly disappeared from homes in Seattle, Washington, or Minneapolis, Minnesota, to fight a holy war in the Horn of Africa.). They are often influenced by radicalizers who stress that their family is less important than their duty to Allah. Hasan communicated with al-Awlaki; Abdulmutallab may have done so, too. (It is remarkable how many of the conspirators in the U.S. and UK have been influenced by al-Awlaki's religious justifications for jihad.)

These individuals are the opposite of the hardened fighters of groups like Hamas and Hezbollah and the Pakistani Taliban, who have grown up in poverty amid a collective sense of oppression. For example, Hezbollah was born among downtrodden Shiites in the slums of southern Beirut, Lebanon. The Pakistani Taliban, now allegedly linked to Shahzad's attempt, overwhelmingly comprises poorly educated and often illiterate young men from rural parts of northern Pakistan.

If the assertion by senior U.S. officials is correct, and Shahzad did link up with the Pakistani Taliban, the young madrassa-educated militants were teaching the bilingual MBA graduate how to bring terror to New York.

soundoff (283 Responses)
  1. NoGods

    Can't we all getting along without gods?

    May 11, 2010 at 1:50 am | Report abuse |
  2. slozomby

    ashamed white man – if your going to mention slavery be sure to mention who sold the slaves to the white man.....
    genocide of the american indian was less religously motivated. more towards the greed side again. different argument.

    im not ashamed that i had the audacity to be born white. doesnt mean i support genocide in any form.

    May 11, 2010 at 1:51 am | Report abuse |
  3. slozomby

    Hey Guys, not all muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are muslims.

    May 11, 2010 at 1:54 am | Report abuse |
  4. slozomby

    nice try.

    May 11, 2010 at 1:55 am | Report abuse |
  5. dawn

    Bubba – Yes, fundamental Muslims will kill anybody who they think is dissing Mohammed, who is an infidel. That is what some of us have been saying. I'm glad you figured that out.

    And ashamed white man – that the hell does your comment have to do with the article??? Did not the French murder a few Native Americans? Did not the Spanish murder a few Native Americans?? Did not the Native Americans murder a few Native Americans? In case you missed the point we are talking about Islam.

    May 11, 2010 at 1:55 am | Report abuse |
  6. Jim

    Cute, slozomby.

    May 11, 2010 at 1:56 am | Report abuse |
  7. Khan


    Correct...these people are not Muslims.

    May 11, 2010 at 1:57 am | Report abuse |
  8. Jason

    Now to finish the fight against terrorism... It cannot be won by dropping bombs from the air, (except dropping Nuclear weapons on Mecca and Medina which should only be done if there is another attack like Sept 11, 2001).

    The real way to fight terrorism is to do it quietly, with suppressed weapons like the H&K MP5SD, in the hands of professionals like SEAL6, SAS, JTF2, SAAS, GSG9 etc. Give these units an open hunting licence for terrorists, the ones who fund the terrorists, the ones who preach terrorism and ones who supply the terrorists.

    A Squad of CT troops doing night ops against the terrorists, will be more effective at combating terrorism then all the bombs and missiles that have been dropped so far.


    May 11, 2010 at 1:57 am | Report abuse |
  9. slozomby

    jason, if i remember correctly that was plan A. it failed miserably. we're several plans past that already

    May 11, 2010 at 2:01 am | Report abuse |
  10. NoGods

    What do you means white? Dosen't we all have same feces color?

    May 11, 2010 at 2:02 am | Report abuse |
  11. Some Guy.

    @ Jido : "Co-religionists?"

    Does the fact that the KKK is also linked to Christianity somehow taint the Christian faith? No.

    Does the abuse of children by priests show that Christianity is the faith of molesters? Certainly not!

    As for those bigots out here spouting hate, I would like to point out that not too long ago Christian Missionaries paired up with Colonial Powers and visited horrors on the rest of the people of the world. Do we blame the teachings of a mild mannered carpenter from Jerusalem for that, no.

    In every faith there are extremists, the rest of the people of that faith instead of apologizing for them should stand up to them, and in Islam many are.

    Coming form Pakistan, my country has been one of the most badly scarred in this fight against extremists and we continue to fight them.

    It would help if our allies in the world stop grouping us with the same and stereotyping us.

    I humbly propose that hatred is the enemy.

    May 11, 2010 at 2:06 am | Report abuse |
  12. Jason

    That is part of the problem then. As where do you think the jihadists are getting their recruits from? Muslim Mosques and Madrassas.
    The jihdist terrorists have killed more Muslims then the "West" has, through IED's, car bombs, suicide bombers etc. Of which the ones doing these attacks along with many other Muslims view these terrorists as heros of Islam.

    Which then brings to question one of their so called motives "Palistine" IF half the money that went to buying weapons, rockets, exposives etc actually went to help the Palistinians, they would not be the sorry shape they are now. WHY? Because that is what the Muslim Imams want there. Because the conflict keeps them in power over the people there.


    May 11, 2010 at 2:11 am | Report abuse |
  13. slozomby

    jason, hmmm a post i happen to agree with. surely a sign of the apocolypse.

    May 11, 2010 at 2:13 am | Report abuse |
  14. Mark

    Anyone who cannot see Islam as a violent and intolerant religion deludes themselves. Islam has a lot of similarities to Catholicism, both rely on the interpretations of priests who place themselves between individuals and God. It is the controlling teachings of these who have the greatest influence upon the young believers. Both religions rule by subjugation, true religion does not. True religion is a relationship between a person and God, no intermediaries required. Islam thrives on violence. If it can't reach out and strike against a non-Muslim then it will strike against other Islamic sects. This is necessary to perpetuate the cause, to keep the minds of the believers away from the true nature of God.

    American militia's operate in much the same way. The depraved leaders of these militia's draw upon the emotions of the individuals rather than on the intellect (which is minimal in so many militia types). Here again an intermediary is involved in the process.

    May 11, 2010 at 2:18 am | Report abuse |
  15. mojoman

    What's new here? Nothing. read the koran, start with sura 9 and you will know why islam isn't and will never be compatible with the West. We would need a zero tolerance policy but can't have it because closet muslim Obama stands in the way. For 2 more years.

    May 11, 2010 at 2:20 am | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19