May 19th, 2010
02:04 PM ET

Iran dismisses proposed U.N. sanctions

With a fresh set of tough sanctions on the table, Iran lashed out Wednesday against U.S. efforts to punish the nation for its nuclear program.

Ali Akbar Javanfekr, an advisor to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, told CNN that U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's statement that key

nations had reached agreement on strong United Nations sanctions will not hurt Iran, but instead will alienate America.

"Mrs. Clinton can have her opinions but every day that passes the position of the Islamic Republic gains more support in the world while America is losing its allies because of its illogical position," Javanfekr said.

"Mrs. Clinton is taking Mr. Obama on the wrong path," he said. "This will not benefit America. As soon as a resolution on sanctions goes before the U.N.,

Mr. Obama will be right back in the same place where Mr. Bush was. It will be a dead end. It will mean the end of Mr. Obama."

Speaking before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Clinton said Tuesday that the United States has been "working closely" with its international partners - the group known as the P5 plus 1 - on a resolution to present to the U.N. Security Council.

The P5 plus 1 includes the five permanent member of the Security Council - the United States, China, Russia, France, and Britain - as well as Germany.

That draft resolution restates the Security Council's demand that Tehran suspend enrichment activities and other proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities. It requires Tehran to cooperate fully with the watchdog International Atomic Inspection Agency.

Among other things, the draft resolution proposes:

- Expanding an arms embargo to include eight categories of conventional weapons, including tanks, armored combat vehicles and combat aircraft.

- Requiring nations to inspect ships or planes heading in or out of Iran if banned materials are suspected of being on board.

- Banning the opening of new Iranian bank branches or offices of financial institutions if they are linked to nuclear programs.

- Freezing assets and banning travel of individuals and companies dealing with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

- Prohibiting Iranian investment in foreign commercial activities capable of delivering nuclear weapons.

The restrictions would be part of a fourth round of U.N. sanctions slapped on Iran.

Clinton's remarks on the sanctions came just one day after Iran signed a deal with Brazil and Turkey to ship out its low-enriched uranium for processing.

But Western nations still believe Iran has military designs, though Iran denies that claim, saying its nuclear program is reserved solely for peaceful purposes.

"Iran has remained in violation of previous Security Council resolutions, it is in violation of its IAEA obligations, and that is why we are here today,

making manifest and real the dual-track approach that we have pursued," U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said Tuesday.

"The goal of this resolution is twofold," Rice said of the new draft. "First, to increase the cost to Iran's leadership for their continued defiance of the international community, and second to persuade Iran that it is in its interest to peacefully resolve concerns about its nuclear program. This draft seeks to support, and not replace, our efforts to engage Iran diplomatically."

But the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization said the sanctions are aimed at sparking political confrontation.

"They are always looking for excuses and pretexts to exert political pressure on Iran, Ali Akbar Salehi told state-run Press TV on Wednesday. "Their main aim and purpose is to divert Iran into confrontation with the West [although] we have always stated that we are not after confrontation, we are after cooperation."

Post by:
Filed under: Iran
soundoff (5 Responses)
  1. Cieje3

    ...And apparently the commenting community dismisses the article. ZING!

    May 19, 2010 at 2:49 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Samson

    It just feels like the United has been spending so much political energy trying to spark some sort of fuel swap and since the deal was not on there terms and they were not the ones that had landed the deal they are not willing to even recognize the steps this country is making to meet the united states demands. Even the leader of the IAEA is saying that the united states is making matters worse at a very critical stage of negotiations.. I'm not liking the way Mrs. Clinton is handling the situation

    May 19, 2010 at 4:01 pm | Report abuse |
  3. Cieje3

    Dang, you ruined my joke.. Bound to happen eventually..

    May 19, 2010 at 4:33 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Smith in Oregon

    Unfortunately, Iran is holding the three stupid and hapless American Hikers that are now charged with Espionage which often carries the Death Sentence. It is entirely likely that Iran will offer to spare the lives of the stupid and hapless Hikers IF America deports several Iranian Nuclear Scientists who would likely be executed shortly after they return to Iran.

    I smell a deal between the US State Department and Iran using the stupid, hapless Hikers as pawns.

    May 19, 2010 at 5:32 pm | Report abuse |
  5. Bomb Iran

    Iran cant even spell U. N.

    May 19, 2010 at 7:39 pm | Report abuse |