- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 57,072,157
The National Rifle Association files a lawsuit against California Gov. Gavin Newsom and other officials after gun stwitter.com/i/web/status/1…CT
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 57,072,157
The Rev. Joseph Lowery, a legendary leader in America's civil rights movement, died Friday at age 98twitter.com/i/web/status/1…h2
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 57,072,157
The number of coronavirus cases in the US passes 100,000 cnn.it/2JhdhkO https://t.co/wmk2lBmpqR
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 57,072,157
President Trump signs the $2 trillion stimulus bill, which includes sending checks to people, and help for health ctwitter.com/i/web/status/1…Ec
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 57,072,157
President Trump invokes the Defense Production Act for the first time, requiring General Motors to manufacture venttwitter.com/i/web/status/1…Pd
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 57,072,157
RT @CNNBusiness: US stocks finished the session in the red on Friday. The Dow closed 915 points, or 4.1%, lower. The S&P 500 finished down…
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 57,072,157
The US House of Representatives votes in favor of a historic $2 trillion coronavirus stimulus package, sending it ttwitter.com/i/web/status/1…hk
CNN POLITICS ON FACEBOOK » | CNN POLITICS ON TWITTER »
Exxon blogs: BP spill a 'dramatic departure' from industry norm
Exxon started a blog called "ExxonMobil's Perspectives" and wrote in it that the disaster in the Gulf is "far from the industry norm."
On the eve of oil executives appearing at a congressional hearing on disaster planning, ExxonMobil launched a blog with a post calling the Gulf oil disaster “a dramatic departure from the industry norm in deepwater drilling.”
"This devastating chain of events is far from the industry norm," wrote Exxon’s chief blogger Ken Cohen, who's also the oil giant's vice president of public and government affairs.
He wrote that what occurred in the Gulf did not “occur on the 14,000 other deepwater wells that have been successfully drilled around the world."
Exxon’s spokesman Karen Matusic told CNN.com that the idea of the blog was conceived before the Deepwater Horizon disaster and that the company hopes it will create a dialogue about the “biggest issues” in the energy industry.
“It would be strange to start a blog and not mention about the rig,” she said.
Writing in his blog, Cohen said: “Understandably, people have questions, comments and concerns about the tragic events unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico. So do we. That’s why we’re making this our primary focus as we start this discussion.” He added that the BP oil disaster will remain a dominant theme.
ExxonMobil isn’t the only company defending its stance on deepwater drilling.
Chevron also spoke out this week.
In an interview with The Wall Street Journal published on Monday, Chevron chairman and CEO John Watson said he accepts the need for tighter drilling regulations in the wake of the spill, but called the six-month moratorium on deep-water drilling imposed by the Obama administration unnecessary.
On Twitter
This is very nice of Exxon, but I still to this day will not buy their gas.
T-Rex, ExxonMobil, Ken Cohen,
M-I Swaco mud engineers discussed this in April, and May. Papa Bear said, the more they circulated, the worse the mud got. The defoamers ("pills") had quit working. What they are hiding is that fact. M-I Swaco engineers (Papa Bear, et al) and BP engineers (Exxon link, et al) wanted to chuck the mud, days before the blowout. When mud goes bad, restoring the five (5) colloid forces, regardless of circulation time, bottoms-up or not, is impossible. Bad mud just gets worse, and once bad, gas permeates through it like water. That's why they reduced the circulating time. That's what they are hiding. And that's why gas raced up the annulus to the pack-off.
They did test the mud. And the mud was bad. They did try to fix it. But they could not. That's why nobody discusses the mud, its measurements not released. Amazing, a whole boat (Damon B. Bankston) full of mud samples from the Macondo well, and no measurements other than weight and viscosity published. Why is that T-Rex, ExxonMobil? Are there no engineers in the US qualified to analyze the evidence? So in short, the "well design", the "centralizers", the "bond log", the "lockdown sleeve", the "blowout preventer", etc, none of them caused Macondo's blowout. Solely, it was the bad mud. Macondo's frothy gas-cut mud settles every lawsuit.
ExxonMobil, Perspectives.
http://www.englishtips-self-taught.blogspot.com What's the real situation? Does the gas already get out of control? It was a pitty to see the enviroment destroying by human being.
Do NOT click on this link!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It contains a VIRUS!
Virus?! You are gonna get crazy man.
Yea Michelle yea!
The source for this accident, were the bad emergency design to handle, a big source of natural gases, from this well,
so must be revised this facilities, on board every oil platform, to prevent others catastrophes like this.
The emegency valve, did not work properly in this emergency.A aditional manualy valve, could be usefull to stop the spill.
Please dont left everything, to the automation.
about the prez speech i would have been impressed if he movedacouple of battalions of navy,coast gaurd to the gulf,iwould have been more impressed if he done it day 1 or 2
i live a stones throw from the gulf although THE OIL HAS NOT reached us yet there are 5,6 places to apply 4 cleanup no one is working even after hazmat training, if ur waiting 4 bp to pay wake up! ur dreaming. its time to do it our selves BP; orWASHINGTON R STALLING because they are more interested in there interests than the GULF