June 22nd, 2010
05:24 PM ET

Security Brief: U.S. indirectly funding Afghan insurgents

Portions of a taxpayer-funded $2.1 billion Pentagon contract to truck supplies to U.S. troops in Afghanistan are being indirectly paid to Afghan insurgents and corrupt public officials as protection money, a congressional investigation revealed.

The U.S military outsources much of the security for truck convoys carrying food, water, equipment, fuel and ammunition to remote and dangerous areas in Afghanistan, and those contractors hire local Afghans who pay bribes for safe passage, according to investigators.

"United States tax dollars are feeding a protection racket in Afghanistan that would make Tony Soprano proud," Rep. John Tierney, D-Massachusetts, said Tuesday, referring to an organized crime boss in the popular TV show "The Sopranos." Tierney make the remark at a hearing on the issue the National Security Subcommittee of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

"This contract appears to have fueled warlordism, extortion, corruption, and maybe even funded the enemy," said Tierney, who is chairman of the subcommittee.

The hearing comes shortly after the release of a 79-page congressional report that details findings ranging "from sobering to shocking," Tierney said in the report's introduction.

CNN reported on Monday that the military is also investigating the issue.

The results of the six-month investigation indicate that outsourcing the Afghanistan supply chain to contractors has resulted in "significant unintended consequences, fueling warlordism, extortion, and corruption, and it may be a significant source of funding for insurgents," the report's executive summary said.

"In other words, the logistics contract has an outsized strategic impact on U.S. objectives in Afghanistan," the report said.

Investigators found that Department of Defense "has been largely blind to the potential strategic consequences of its supply-chain contingency contracting," and that the U.S. military has little understanding of how the security is provided.

When contractors reported to the DOD that they were being extorted by warlords for protection payments for safe passage and that these payments were "funding the insurgency, they were largely met with indifference and inaction," the report said.

The "Afghan Host Nation Trucking" contract in question stipulates that the prime contractors are responsible for the safe passage of the cargo that they carry. Most contractors subcontract, hiring local Afghans for armed protection of the convoys transporting supplies.

The manager of the largest private security provider, Watan Risk Management, said he complained to U.S. military officials that his company had to pay bribes ranging from $1,000 to $10,000 monthly to Afghan governors, police chiefs, and local military officials whose territory the convoys traversed. DOD officials confirmed they were aware of the bribes, according to the report.

The private security companies that protect the convoys regularly encounter armed conflict with alleged insurgents and other criminal elements, the report says, and hundreds of security providers are killed annually.

One key convoy security commander in Afghanistan told investigators he spent $1.5 million on ammunition per month to protect his convoy trucks.

Investigators found no direct evidence of payoffs to the Taliban, but many military officials overseeing the contract believed that the Taliban did receive protection payments, based on information provided to them by contractor representatives, the report said.

Since mid-2009, contractors have completed over 40,000 missions, subcommittee statistics show.

soundoff (3 Responses)
  1. Stonedogz

    Why is it wrong for the AZ police to check to see if a crime is being committed? Why is it a violation of my civil rights to be asked provide proof of my citizenship?

    Why does Mexico aid and abet its own citizens to illegally enter this country?
    What business is it to Mexico if a US state chooses to beef up its own immigration enforcement?
    Why the concern... why does Mexico seek to protect its citizens within our own country but shows nothing but indifference to the blatant social disparity they face (Mexicans) within there own borders?

    Is Mexico going save the whales next, the Mexican whales I mean?

    June 22, 2010 at 7:57 pm | Report abuse |
  2. evan Mark

    Please people learn about how horrible it was for good Afghans living under the Taliban:
    You absolutely MUST see this.

    August 12, 2010 at 12:11 am | Report abuse |
  3. lighting manufacturers in the UK

    cheers for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more info? as it is extremely useful for me.

    November 24, 2011 at 3:59 pm | Report abuse |