September 30th, 2010
01:12 PM ET

'100 percent' chance for life on newly found planet?

An artist rendering shows the four inner planets of the Gliese 581 system and their host star.

Gliese 581g may be the new Earth.

A team of astronomers from the University of California and the Carnegie Institute of Washington say they've found a planet like ours, 20 light years (120 trillion miles) from Earth, where the basic conditions for life are good.

"The chances for life on this planet are 100 percent," Steven Vogt, a UC professor of astronomy and astrophysics says. "I have almost no doubt about it."

The planet is three times the size of Earth, but the gravity is similar.

Dr. Elizabeth Cunningham, planetarium astronomer at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, says the discovery is a huge deal.

"It could have liquid water on the surface," she said. "That's the first step to find life."

The Gliese 581 system's orbit compared to our own solar system. The planet labeled G is the one scientists believe could very likely support life.

There are hundreds of known extrasolar planets that have been discovered in the Milky Way, but this is the first that could support life.

Earthlings won't be traveling to Gliese 581g any time soon unfortunately. Scientists say a spaceship traveling close to the speed of light would take 20 years to make this journey.

But if we did - we'd find some other things familiar. The atmosphere and gravity are similar to Earth, and if you're from the polar regions, you'd definitely feel right at home. Scientists say the highest average temperature is about -12 degrees Celcius (10 Fahrenheit), but they point out that the planet doesn't have a night and day - one side continually faces the star and the other side faces the darkness of space. This means one side is blazing hot and the other freezing cold.

Gliese orbits a red dwarf star called Gliese 581. Cunningham says "it's a Goldilocks planet."

"It's not too hot, it's not too cold, it's just right" for water to form, Cunningham said.

The area is called the "Goldilocks zone."

Other planets near Gliese 581g have been discovered, but they are not habitable and are mainly comprised of gas. Gliese 581g, however, is a rocky planet.

It was discovered using the Keck telescope in Hawaii which has been observing the star Gliese 581 for 11 years.

"Keck's long-term observations of the wobble of nearby stars enabled the detection of this multi-planetary system," said Mario R. Perez, Keck program scientist at NASA headquarters in Washington.

Astronomers are excited this new planet was discovered so fast and relatively close by.

"I'm surprised we found one so fast," Cunningham said. "The implication is either we were very lucky or these planets could be relatively common."

Gliese 581g is in the constellation of Libra. While Earth takes 365 days to orbit our star, the sun, Gliese 581g orbits its star in 37 days.

Post by:
Filed under: Science • Space
soundoff (1,327 Responses)
  1. TF2 hat collector

    Lets move! 😀

    September 30, 2010 at 1:34 pm | Report abuse |

      Lets not. Let us first check with the NATIVES on this planet and see if they want us to visit/come and stay. We don't want to repeat genocide as we did here in America with the indians, or any place were white european "settlers" have gone about this planet.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:08 pm | Report abuse |
    • arthurr

      I am sure of life on other planets-no speculaltion there. I guess they can see it's not rotating ,so no day and night, but how can they tell its gravity is 3 times the Earth???? Where do they get that from??? How do you weight space bodies light years away???? Are they kidding us?

      September 30, 2010 at 2:11 pm | Report abuse |
    • freeman

      Lance, we couldn't destroy this planet if we tried. We could at best make that paper thin layer that sits on its surface (aka, the biosphere) inhospitable to ourselves for a time. But natural phenomena could do it much better (and will, its unavoidable in the long run), with results lasting much longer.

      Besides, since we have not found any other intelligent life as of yet, that means for us Humanity is the MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE UNIVERSE. I would wreck the fleeting surface conditions of a THOUSAND worlds in order to insure Humanity's survival.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:21 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tom

      arthurr: a measure of a planet's mass (which, along with its radius, allows you to calculate the force of gravity on its surface) is fairly straightforward and involves looking at the orbit of the planet around its star, along with the orbits of any other planets in the system. If the planet has a moon, it's very easy to calculate its mass by looking at the orbit of the moon. Otherwise you need to use some more advanced methods and look at the effect that the planet's gravitational pull has on the orbits of the other nearby planets.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:26 pm | Report abuse |
    • Greg

      uhhh they said right in the article how the mass was weighed... by observing the subtle wobble in the star. Every mass in the universe attracts other objects, so the planet is essentially pulling the star slightly toward itself as it circles. The only reason the star remains somewhat stationary is because it is bigger.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:27 pm | Report abuse |
    • Steve

      Arthurr, you can calculate the mass of the planet if you know the distance from the star, the star's mass, and the planet's orbital velocity. It's not hard to get within 5% of a star's mass, and it's easy to solve from there. Any high-school physics student can do it.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:28 pm | Report abuse |
    • Dave

      If you know the Mass and Radius of a planet you can calculate the gravity Arthurr.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:30 pm | Report abuse |
    • mike


      I imagine they are calculating the weight by the amount of gravity it has. Gravity is proportional to the weight of anything. Believe it or not, even you have a very small amount of gravity.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:30 pm | Report abuse |
    • Randy

      Why is it the new scientists always cite chance?

      September 30, 2010 at 2:33 pm | Report abuse |

      I can just see: 20 years in deep space on the USS MAYFLOWER and all of us are suffering from cabin fever. Finally, we land on the bad side of this planet and are greeted by naive iron age equivalent natives. They have no real weapons to defend themselves against our pulse microwave rifles or miniature nukes. They help us out that first year, whatever that is, by sheltering us and giving us the taste of real food for the first time since leaving earth. We are introduce to their culture and we learn, and learn, and learn until we pretty much have them figure out and their planet. Our scouts have long been around and about surveying all the wonders of their planet while the rest of us play the grateful visitor. Then suddenly there are more ships from earth and we overwhelm them. We suffocate them into our 24/7 news cycle culture and bad cable tv programming. The natives revolt. We now look at them as an inferior race not worthy of the land they stand on. We send them permanently to the dark or bright side of the planet and let them figure it out. Last but not least we declared MANIFEST DESTINY and that ALL SPECIES ARE CREATED EQUAL.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:34 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mr.X

      Think the locals need some blankets or fire water? >:)

      September 30, 2010 at 2:42 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mr. Positive

      That is absolutely amazing news! I am really glad to know that our planet is not a one of a kind. I will keep my fingers crossed for extreme advancements in our technology towards space travel. I hope we can visit in my life time. =D Keep up the great work guys!

      September 30, 2010 at 2:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • freeman

      Arc Orbis, you are retarded.
      "A chance of life" does not equal in any way "a chance of intelligent life."
      While intelligent life is very probable given the size of the universe, chances of its being on a planet only 20 light years from us is infinitesimally small.
      I think you watched Avatar one time too many!

      September 30, 2010 at 2:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • JoePub

      Good grief, does everything have to be so politically motivated and result in devolving petty comments?

      September 30, 2010 at 2:48 pm | Report abuse |
    • The ET Sculptor

      Earth has been and always will be a 3rd dimensional school where we evolve from being primitive to remembering who we truly are and how we are connected to all the beings of the Universe through the same Creator. We are here to remember the importance of living in the Light with unconditional Love. In order to be in the New World, one must give up greed, judgment, prejudice and fear by seeing the Creator/Source in each and every being.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:00 pm | Report abuse |
    • HK

      Are we there yet? no. Are we there yet? no. Are we there yet? no!

      September 30, 2010 at 3:02 pm | Report abuse |
    • andy

      arrrthur: Gravity can be measured many ways including the pull it has on other objects orbits. I took Astronomy 101 which is all you need to understand that they are not kidding us. There are ways of detecting these things. For example, you can tell how big a planet is by measure how dim a star becomes at certain times. This dimming is the equivalent of an ant walking across a headlight. Not notable to the naked eye, but technology can see the difference. They are very serious.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:02 pm | Report abuse |
    • Kevin

      Since this planet isn't constantly revolving like our own, how does it maintain its atmosphere? I thought you had to have a rapid rate of rotation in order to have a magnetic field which protects the atmosphere from being broken down by solar energy. How could life survive?

      September 30, 2010 at 3:05 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mordred

      I like how wildly exaggerated this story gets every time its told. One article this morning said that it originally was looked at but found not to support life. Then they did some 're-calculations' and found it to be just on the edge of the threshold. Now it's a 100% chance. Oh and btw...we havent developed lights speed yet.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:09 pm | Report abuse |

      @Arc: Which side is the bad side? The one where its blazing hot or the one where its freezing cold? We're screwed either way, I'm just curious which side you would prefer NOT to land on.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:18 pm | Report abuse |
    • cnd

      @ arthurr. Gravity is directly proportional to the size of the planet. F=Gm1*m2/d2 where g is the universal gravitational constant, m1 is mass or planet 1, m2 is planet 2 and d2 is the square of the distance between the planets . That's the formula for measuring centrifugal gravitational force between two bodies and it has been proven by our visit to the moon. This is how you can tell the gravitational pull of far away planetary bodies.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:20 pm | Report abuse |

      @ Arthurr: Just becasue this planet has no day and night, does not mean that it does not rotate. It only means that the rate of rotaion is equal to the rate at which it revolves around its star. Ever heard of the "dark side of the moon"?

      September 30, 2010 at 3:22 pm | Report abuse |
    • Sark

      It wouldn’t let me do a normal post so I had to do a reply. %100, have these scientist lost their minds? How in the world can you be so sure? And what’s with this presumption that aliens would need water to survive. We have absolutely no idea what life outside our planet would be like if in fact it did exist. For all we know life outside this plant could be some kind of gas that floats through space, and doesn’t need water or a planet to survive. Humans can be so self absorbed, thinking that life will look or be like us in any way at all. The chances that life would be something so different that we may not even be able to see and understand it are much greater then having life be like us. There are endless possibilities out there so the chances of extraterrestrial life being even close to what we are like is ridiculous. One thing people don’t realize is that we evolved to adapt and form to this plant, not the other way around. This plant was here long before us, and will be here long after us. It’s ridiculous to believe that the entire plant was made just so our little flash of existence can survive on it. Had our life evolved on another planet we would have been a completely different kind of creature, evolved to adapt to whatever that environment would have been. We are made up of water and need it here on this planet because there is so much if it here, we evolved to need it and be a part of it. I think a lot of people are losing their minds. It seems they want to believe in something so bad, they will reach far into the ridiculous to do so.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:28 pm | Report abuse |
    • James

      Earth First!
      We'll stripmine Gliese later.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:32 pm | Report abuse |
    • Michael paul

      He said the chances are 100%, and then said he had almost no doubt about it??? That's not 100%!!! I'm starting to think these guys are retards. There is no way to prove life exists on a planet that far away.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:36 pm | Report abuse |
    • jay

      WOW! you really can't see the wonders of a new world, you sad basturds?! particularly to you Lance (et al.,), quit being such dorks! absurd nay sayer pessimism hardly contributes to progress, advancements, and new perspectives....this is an astonishing brilliant potential for human kind,wonderful revelation of science and technology as well....just utterly outstanding!

      September 30, 2010 at 3:37 pm | Report abuse |
    • jSY622

      @ARC ORBIS: It could be the other way around..and they can travel to us which would make us the "native americans"

      If we could travel at the speed of light, wouldn't that mean we could travel through time? In that case, why not travel into the future to see what happens?

      September 30, 2010 at 3:38 pm | Report abuse |
    • sf13

      Wait...what is that?? There's already a damn Starbucks and McDonald's on there!

      September 30, 2010 at 3:38 pm | Report abuse |
    • jaquin

      @ arthurr- Because it is closer to the sun.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:39 pm | Report abuse |
    • Greg

      Wow….just like earth huh? Bloody fools!

      “but they point out that the planet doesn't have a night and day – one side continually faces the star and the other side faces the darkness of space. This means one side is blazing hot and the other freezing cold.”

      September 30, 2010 at 3:43 pm | Report abuse |
    • juki777

      I hope humanity learns from this discovery. Instead waging wars amoung ourselves , spending trillions to find new ways to potentially annihilate our civilization (and planet) , we should all come together and work towards new horizons and a better future for the human race !!!

      September 30, 2010 at 3:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tom

      In actuality, the planet is rotating, at the same speed it is orbiting the star. If it weren't rotating it would have days as long as the year on the planet.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:50 pm | Report abuse |
    • ChrisMeece

      Well there was global warming found on Mars, so we know George W. Bush was the cause of that. He'll probably be to blame for the global warming on this planet.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:56 pm | Report abuse |
    • Amber

      Im no Astrophysicist, but if its not rotating does that mean that it has little or no Magnetosphere? Just wonderin... 🙂

      September 30, 2010 at 4:03 pm | Report abuse |
    • toggy

      to: Arthurr– they determine the size of the planet by how much light the star dims by when it passes in front during an orbit, simple mathematics....

      September 30, 2010 at 4:05 pm | Report abuse |
    • Rozenritter

      Freeman: Like you said, the possibility is small, but it still exists. And if you don´t get it, Arc was being sarcastic about it. also, if we do encounter some intelligent life there, what do you think would happen? We can´t even see other races as our equals, and we tend to hunt and eat other species.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:06 pm | Report abuse |
    • savjic

      I have to poke it with a stick and see if it moves! If it does,it's alive

      September 30, 2010 at 4:07 pm | Report abuse |
    • Raj

      I Like the comment " Sure, let's go destroy another planet after this one", I wonder wat would be the selection process for the inhabitants from eath if we ever occupy G , and if there are people there already they would scream "illegal immigrants"

      September 30, 2010 at 4:08 pm | Report abuse |
    • Knightly Q. Blowguns

      OK, whoever chose this headline? He is not saying that there is a 100% chance that we will go there and find alien life already living there. He is saying there is a 100% chance that we could survive if we went there. HUGE difference.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:17 pm | Report abuse |
    • Have At It

      We should send Lindsey Lohan and Paris Hilton to go see if it's hospitable for the rest of us!

      September 30, 2010 at 4:18 pm | Report abuse |
    • Betrice

      Didnt you watch the press release of the Government video that tells us that there are ET's and UFO's are real?
      It was on CNN. They said the ETS were interested and watching the weapons our government was/is building.

      They wont let us destroy another planet.
      We all know the truth but they keep it locked up from us, sheltered.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:21 pm | Report abuse |
    • bobert1965

      Everyone told arthur how to calculate the gravity, but nobody realized or mentioned that the article didn't say that the gravity was three times the Earth's, it says the planet is three times that of Earth and the gravity is similar.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:22 pm | Report abuse |
    • Scientist

      Key take away 20 light years away. We are seeing 20 light years into the past.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:30 pm | Report abuse |
    • ehallman

      They have been studying this system for 11 years and just found the planet ...WOW!!!!! There are billions and billions of planets out there that could have the possibility of supporting life as we know it and even more that could support life as we don't know it. We can see 125 Billion galaxies, how many more do you think there are, and how many of those have planets. People are so naive to think we are the only ones around.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:34 pm | Report abuse |
    • Dane

      Good thing we cant get there fast. We would just destroy as we have the Earth!!!!!!! SMH

      September 30, 2010 at 4:35 pm | Report abuse |
    • Sweetsonic

      So glad that they found this's totally changed my life.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:37 pm | Report abuse |
    • ThaGerm

      Lance, you have to be a real idiot to find something negative to say about this. Congrats tard.

      blue, they calculate the density of the nearby star using it luminosity (luminosity equals mass to the power of 3.5) THEN they observe the affects of the orbiting planet on the star. By observing the affect (the amount of wobble) the planet has on the star they then calculate the mass of the planet.

      Really people, if you don't know it isn't smart to mouth-off, and that is just good "life advice".

      September 30, 2010 at 4:40 pm | Report abuse |
    • Nico

      To find the gravity you measure the effect of the movement of the plant compared to the stars and other bodies around it. It is quite possible to calculate the gravity, mass and acceleration of the planets simply by observing their movement and having some frame of reference.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:40 pm | Report abuse |
    • S

      Wish these intelligent people would dedicate their time to more important stuff like finding cures for diseases...

      September 30, 2010 at 4:42 pm | Report abuse |
    • Guest

      20 light years away is only 20 years in the past. 1990 on GL 581g

      September 30, 2010 at 4:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • Adam

      The science and physics around space travel and exploration are extremely important for humanity. It takes generations to build theories and discoveries that can enable us to leave our solar system. None of us will live to see humans leave this system, but we cannot forsake the R&D necessary to make it happen because of the long time frames involved.
      If humanity cannot leave earth, we will all die here. There will come a time when this planet will no longer support life. That is a hard fact of science.
      I personally hope that physics will give us a way to create some type of interstellar propulsion system than enables travel amongst the stars within a reasonable time frame. If not there are other alternatives to help our species survive, robotic exploration and so called "ark" ships that bio tech will one day make possible.
      The point of this being is that we cannot give up or ignore the great importance of increasing and building on our scientific understanding of our universe and our role as intelligent life in surviving the hostile nature of it.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • toomuch2many

      Katherine, lol very good point.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:46 pm | Report abuse |
    • eyenstein

      37 days to orbit instead of 365, sounds like it will be too windy for me

      September 30, 2010 at 4:48 pm | Report abuse |
    • wheres waldo

      sweet!!! so when can we move to it?

      never? so you cares
      maybe this is where the avatar is

      September 30, 2010 at 4:49 pm | Report abuse |
    • BJC

      I bet the first building on that planet will be WALMART.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:51 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jay

      @Tom we dont know the mass! we only know the size and guesstimate the weight based on the other gravitational pulls and what it orbits duh

      September 30, 2010 at 4:58 pm | Report abuse |
    • JeffDenver

      Until we actually SEE life on other planets, yes, it is speculation. No, there is no 100% chance. Please stop treating science as a religion. kthx.

      September 30, 2010 at 5:00 pm | Report abuse |
    • psw

      Any body else out there who wants to tell arthurr how to determine gravity? The Dude we wont know if your right for six more months. Now, can all you physicists tell TheDude how I figured that out?

      September 30, 2010 at 5:03 pm | Report abuse |
    • gge

      so.... if there happens to be intelligent life on Gliese, maybe a civilization, what should we call them?



      September 30, 2010 at 5:20 pm | Report abuse |
    • token white person

      no...mexicans will want to come no no way....its not happenin guys

      September 30, 2010 at 5:28 pm | Report abuse |
    • Dystopian_Rex

      So the sweet spot for us humans would be the narrow twilight band between the star facing / space facing sides of the planet. If it has any type of atmosphere the tempature differences may cause some really windy conditions.

      September 30, 2010 at 5:37 pm | Report abuse |
    • Re:Kevin

      Earth's global magnetic field comes from an active dynamo - that is, circulating currents at the planet's liquid metallic core. A similar dynamo once churned inside Mars, but for reasons unknown it stopped working four billion years ago.

      So it is not rotation of the planet itself that leads to a magnetosphere, rather it is internal churning of the core. Without such a dynamo, the atmosphere of mars, and any other planet, may be blown into space by solar winds.

      September 30, 2010 at 5:41 pm | Report abuse |
    • JT

      This is CRAZY. 120 trillion miles and they can say 100%. The only thing that is 100% is this guy is an IDIOT! Freezing on one side, sizzling hot on the other. Hope they build a Sandals soon, can't wait to visit.

      September 30, 2010 at 5:49 pm | Report abuse |
    • john adams

      you can tell gravity and weight based on the size of the planet

      September 30, 2010 at 5:49 pm | Report abuse |
    • RuggedJay

      They can calculate the gravity there by measuring the mass of the planet itself, which they can calculate by it's size and it's gravitational force. Pretty simple, really.

      September 30, 2010 at 5:50 pm | Report abuse |
    • Brian

      So just give it a push and start its engines! then seed it with our life.... easy enuf!

      September 30, 2010 at 5:54 pm | Report abuse |
    • danilo

      already heard about physics? lol

      September 30, 2010 at 5:55 pm | Report abuse |
    • asche

      Arthurr, you claim to be certain of life on other planets, no speculation, yet you have no proof whatsoever. Given that, how are you mystified that, using well known newtonian physics, scientists are able to determine the gravity of an observable planet.
      You're convinced that life exists other planets for no apparent reason but just can't believe we're able to describe something that's sitting right in front of us . . .

      September 30, 2010 at 5:58 pm | Report abuse |
    • eflashpp2

      Actually arthurr, they say it's 3 times the size of the earth but the gravity is similar, you can calculate gravity quite easily by the interaction with other planets; and it IS rotating, like mercury it rotates once every orbit of the sun (a planetary year), hence it keeps one side always facing its star

      September 30, 2010 at 6:06 pm | Report abuse |
    • chris

      in terms of gravity the way they were able to detect this planet in the first place was by measuring the wobble of its star, or in other words, the gravitational effect the planet has on its star makes the star wobble slightly, without the ability to detect the wobble we would have never discovered this, or other, extrasolar planets. there is most definitely a way, if they can measure how much of an effect the planet has on the star, to figure out the strength of the planets gravitational field

      September 30, 2010 at 6:12 pm | Report abuse |
    • H. Gruber

      The conditions of the planet ,orbit, and if they have traces of water -will mean that 99.99% it will have life but it could be a microscopic – virus type, The probability that there is intelligent life in the universe is 100% the reason we Have not founded is because we are just starting out- @freeman so no, you are wrong about HUMANITY being important!! It is arrogance to think that- Humans are good at mimic and reproduction- the advances come from a few abnormal Geniuses who carry everyone else forward a tiny fraction- then others build upon this forward leap.

      September 30, 2010 at 6:19 pm | Report abuse |
    • KimB

      Realistically the astronomers can use the following equations given the mass of the star (which we usually know), the period of the orbit of the planet (how long it takes to move around the star which we can tell by Doppler or a decrease in the light emitted sometimes).
      r^3=((G*M)/(4*pi^2))*P^2 where p is the period, M the star's mass, G the gravitational constant and that gives you r, it's orbital radius
      then they use
      v=sqrt(GM/r) where the letters mean the same as before and that gives you v, the velocity of the planet
      then they use
      m=(M*V)/v where M and V are the mass and velocity of the star and m and v are the mass and velocity of the planet. The velocity of the star can be derived from the Doppler if you know the inclination of the planets orbit. Simple as that and you know the mass of the planet.

      September 30, 2010 at 6:19 pm | Report abuse |
    • cedavid

      aurthurr...please educate yourself before you reply, it makes you look silly

      September 30, 2010 at 6:26 pm | Report abuse |
    • Bubblehead

      Are you serious, this is the type of comment you wanted to make. I sure the scientists who made this announcement aren't just sitting there saying; Hey, we should make some outrageous claim and hope all those schmucks buy it. If you have a serious question then please ask it but save your idiotic questions for places like Conservative Christian websites.

      September 30, 2010 at 6:26 pm | Report abuse |
    • Heather

      "The chances for life on this planet are 100 percent," ... "I have almost no doubt about it."

      Now THATS a headline.
      ..I'm almost sure of it.

      September 30, 2010 at 6:31 pm | Report abuse |
    • Ryan

      said it's three times the size, but less gravity. no specific amount. it's a safe assumption to tell via the fact it's not spinning as fast/faster, approximate density (same way they tell the approximate density of our planet and other planets in the system.) also via the orbit of surrounding celestial bodies and their effects on each other.

      September 30, 2010 at 6:40 pm | Report abuse |
    • John

      I am 100% sure that theres life on other planets because the universe is so huge scientist cant even figure out how many planets are out there. what i guess the farest we seen have just exposed Gliese 581g which is only 20 light years away. Dont you think theres there more planet in farther range? well even though Gliese 581g is half blazing hot and freezing cold there might already be life if not there might be animals or even a different form of humans..

      September 30, 2010 at 6:42 pm | Report abuse |
    • eflashpp2

      Scientists say the highest average temperature is about -12 degrees Celcius (10 Fahrenheit), This means one side is blazing hot and the other freezing cold
      blazing hot at -12 degrees..are scientists getting dumber?
      but they point out that the planet doesn't have a night and day – one side continually faces the star and the other side faces the darkness of space..
      umm...hey scientisit..that means one side has day...the other side has night...night and day..duh

      September 30, 2010 at 6:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • Cameron

      OK, here's the question, how long to get to this planet with the equipment we currently have? 10 years? 30 years? whats then number?

      September 30, 2010 at 6:58 pm | Report abuse |
    • Roy

      100% chance of microbial life maybe. This seems exaggerated. To all the people who say life could not resemble us? Remember you only get the chart of the nuclides to work with, and the laws of physics to obey. So yes life is probably going to resemble something we would recognize. With the extreme temperatures from tidal lock it is doubtful life would evolve past one cell. Without a moon to vacuum space for us it was probably and still is bombarded heavily from space, so mass extinctions would be frequent. I am calling BS on this article. They probably need funding for a new telescope, which I hope they get. Give them the money for a new space telescope, or maybe a moon based one, come on congress.

      September 30, 2010 at 7:10 pm | Report abuse |
    • bobby15960

      🙂 good idea too many landfills here, we could all start over.

      September 30, 2010 at 7:15 pm | Report abuse |
    • nomad

      @freeman...its total idiots such as yourself that give human beings a bad name, you arrogant a$$...HUMANITY IS NOT WORTH WRECKING OTHER BIOSPHERES OR LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS...human beings have proven themselves to be, so far, a totally destructive species and warrant less consideration than other, less destructive get over yourself, moron...

      September 30, 2010 at 7:19 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tyrsgodi

      I have no issue with reading the wobbles and determining gravitational pull, but how on Earth do they go from an inferred gravitational object to a slow-rotation planet with a viable atmospheric zone? This requires a leap of faith that far exceeds belief in a Creator and a six-day Creation.

      September 30, 2010 at 7:36 pm | Report abuse |
    • Monty Burns, Springfield

      Today, we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives. We have created, for the first time in all history, a garden of pure ideology, where each worker may bloom secure from the pests of contradictory and confusing truths. Our Unification of Thoughts is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on earth. We are one people, with one will, one resolve, one cause. Our enemies shall talk themselves to death, and we will bury them with their own confusion. We shall prevail!

      September 30, 2010 at 7:39 pm | Report abuse |
    • val

      yeah lets move to Goldilocks zone."! 🙂

      September 30, 2010 at 7:40 pm | Report abuse |
    • jacob

      the article says 100% chance of life, i agree because no where does it state complex life, the temperature on surface is irrelevant to the biengs under the crust. For micro organism, or even some type of earthworm if you want multicellular, what matters is the water at this proximity to sun and the atmosphere to protect from radiation, also it orbits a red dwarf, so chances are if there was larger life forms, they would be small compared to earth, because not as much energy coming from the sun to the planet. but all in all i will say THIS IS AMAZING!

      September 30, 2010 at 8:04 pm | Report abuse |
    • nk

      i think we should set up a coleny on the future and it will have only wind power and soler power

      September 30, 2010 at 8:11 pm | Report abuse |
    • ugh ughson

      Freeman the US alone has a nuclear stockpile large enough to push the earth off its orbit. mathematically proven

      September 30, 2010 at 8:17 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tom

      Based upon the statement "The chances for life on this planet are 100 percent," Steven Vogt, a UC professor of astronomy and astrophysics says. "I have almost no doubt about it." These astronomers clearly no little about biology since we currently have no scientific explination for how life *began* on our planet.

      September 30, 2010 at 8:34 pm | Report abuse |
    • The Engineer


      September 30, 2010 at 8:34 pm | Report abuse |
    • Arc23

      Chuck Norris could flap his arms and fly there and back holding his breath the whole way.

      September 30, 2010 at 8:42 pm | Report abuse |
    • Ed Sr

      The words that Freeman wrote are the words of a misinformed idiot................nobody should destroy anything in the name of humanity...............that is why we have prisons............for destructive people............

      September 30, 2010 at 8:51 pm | Report abuse |
    • @Sark

      Hello, Sark. That wasn most enjoyable. I appreciate the comment that someone is thinking outside the stereotypical 'box' and is truly taking a step back and looking at things. Who is to say that life needs water? Or air? Or anything, because what if the extra terrestrials have the ability to turn matter to energy and vice versa? What that means for some of you, is that what if i took a rock, turned it to energy, and thats all i needed for the rest of the day. Not food, per say, nor water. Just any form of matter. Not consumption, conversion. So thank you Sark for bringing your lightned opinion on this rather dreary subject.

      September 30, 2010 at 8:51 pm | Report abuse |
    • Brian

      I think we need to get a probe off asap to check this system out. It will take 200 years at 10% light speed however its within our ability to do it.

      September 30, 2010 at 9:00 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jamz9msu

      Sign me up! lol

      September 30, 2010 at 9:02 pm | Report abuse |
    • BabyT

      They might have unobtainium worth trillions of dollars!!! Im going to go create an avatar of myself and head right on over!

      September 30, 2010 at 9:36 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mastrodamus

      I guess they just want to keep ignoring the fact that we have Nibiru heading this way.

      September 30, 2010 at 9:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • jacob

      life doesn't even need water on OUR OWN PLANET to survive really, look at some single celled organism or life near closer to the center of the core, or oxygen for that matter. not to mention that they we have FISH living in EXTREME cold temperatures under the poles and look at flamingo's legs for and the acidity that they can stand, no pun attended.

      September 30, 2010 at 10:04 pm | Report abuse |
    • robert

      IS IT THE MORMON PLANET KOLOB.............

      September 30, 2010 at 10:06 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mike

      I'm still looking for signs of intelligent life on earth.

      September 30, 2010 at 10:06 pm | Report abuse |
    • Bentley

      How is it possible that every planet they find they say has life or water? But they have yet to show us either?

      September 30, 2010 at 10:41 pm | Report abuse |
    • Paul

      Does anyone know how they can tell this planet is not rotating?

      September 30, 2010 at 10:55 pm | Report abuse |
    • Anonymous

      Very funny. Twenty light years means it would take a regular spacecraft, before everybody dies of age, to some random dwarf. This planet is too far from that one to send a real person.

      October 1, 2010 at 7:07 am | Report abuse |
    • Anonymous

      wait, nvm xD

      October 1, 2010 at 7:10 am | Report abuse |
    • celia

      We should probably consider that their is probably some sort of life inhabiting the planet before we ever consider moving there. Another thing I would like to add is the possible new bacteria and germs are bodies wouldnt be used to. It would be like what happened to the indians when we came to america. They caught are common cold and chicken pocks and died.

      October 1, 2010 at 10:20 am | Report abuse |
    • Goldilocks is freezing, or burning

      100%? ridiculous.
      If one side faces sun, and other faces dark...then there is a very fine ring of HORIZON that MIGHT be habitable. I can't believe someone from a UC actually opened their mouth before they caught this little detail.

      October 1, 2010 at 8:48 pm | Report abuse |
    • Nibiru its almost here.

      It's Planet X , none as Nibiru in the Sumarian text, which has a long liptical orbit every 3600 years it comes into our solar system based on the work of Zecharia Sitchin has garnered much attention among ufologists, ancient astronaut theorists and conspiracy theorists. He claims to have uncovered, through his retranslations of Sumerian texts, evidence that the human race was visited by a group of extraterrestrials from a distant planet in our own Solar System.

      Part of his theory lies in an astronomical interpretation of the Babylonian creation myth, the Enuma Elish, in which he replaces the names of gods with hypothetical planets. However, since the principal evidence for Sitchin's claims lies in his own personally derived etymologies and not on any scholarly agreed interpretations, his theories remain at most pseudoscience to the majority of academics.

      Sitchin's theory proposes the planets Tiamat and Nibiru. Tiamat supposedly existed between Mars and Jupiter. He postulated that it was a thriving world in a much differently shaped solar system, with jungles and oceans, whose orbit was disrupted by the arrival of a large planet or very small star (less than twenty times the size of Jupiter) which passed through the solar system between 65 million and four billion years ago. The new orbits caused Tiamat to collide with one of the moons of this object, which is known as Nibiru. The debris from this collision are thought by the theory's proponents to have variously formed the asteroid belt, the Moon, and the current inclination of the planet Earth.

      To the Babylonians, Nibiru was the celestial body or region sometimes associated with the god Marduk. The word is Akkadian and the meaning is uncertain. Because of this, the planet Nibiru is sometimes also referred to as Marduk. Sitchin hypothesizes it as a planet in a highly elliptic orbit around the Sun, with a perihelion passage some 3,600 years ago and assumed orbital period of about 3,750 years; he also claims it was the home of a technologically advanced human-like alien race, the Anunnaki, who apparently visited Earth in search of gold. These beings eventually created humanity by genetically crossing themselves with extant primates, and thus became the first gods.

      Beginning in 1995, websites such as ZetaTalk have identified Nibiru or "Planet X" as a brown dwarf currently within our planetary system, soon to pass relatively close to Earth. Sitchin disagrees with the timing of passage. All will see in 2011 the second sister of our own Sun will be visible by that time the size of the moon, by 2012 to 2013 this planet will distrupt everything possible a pole shift on Earth.

      Sitchin also postulates that Pluto began life as Gaga, a satellite of Saturn which, due to gravitational disruption caused by Nibiru's passing, was flung into orbit beyond Neptune.

      October 9, 2010 at 1:10 pm | Report abuse |
  2. nope.avi

    Plot Twist: the aliens were right next door on a neighboring planet

    I'd buy it!

    September 30, 2010 at 1:35 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tommy

      No one believed me when I stated that (smiles)

      September 30, 2010 at 1:57 pm | Report abuse |
  3. 11cInfantry

    Alright guys, lets go mess that one up too! xD

    September 30, 2010 at 1:43 pm | Report abuse |

      take me!

      September 30, 2010 at 2:07 pm | Report abuse |
  4. JK

    I claim this planet in the Name of PEACE. No wars, just sport contests to settle disputes-then a good beer afterward.

    September 30, 2010 at 1:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • Ricardo

      And beautiful women too.

      September 30, 2010 at 1:57 pm | Report abuse |
    • freeman

      Green ones.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:25 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jimthedo, Phoenix, AZ

      And all the females look like Crystal Bernard!

      September 30, 2010 at 2:34 pm | Report abuse |
    • bandygirl

      JK...I like your style!! No wars just good beer!!

      September 30, 2010 at 2:40 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mr.X

      I vote for Twister.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mordred

      Now we've got a place for all the illegal aliens on THIS planet!

      September 30, 2010 at 3:13 pm | Report abuse |
    • Sammie

      I will Grab the Leinies!!!! Can't call anything else good beer! LOL

      September 30, 2010 at 3:36 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jamie

      A soccer game is not going to settle issues of life and death. Sorry, but people are going to resort to violence when their resources and interests are threatened. It is as much our nature as breathing. ..we're not some great benevolent enlightened being. .we're apes. ..find a bigger stick and watch your back

      September 30, 2010 at 3:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tim

      Taking Starbucks to a whole new level.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:13 pm | Report abuse |
    • Robbie


      September 30, 2010 at 4:20 pm | Report abuse |
    • bobert1965

      @ Jimthedo, Phoenix, AZ – I agree with you 100%

      September 30, 2010 at 4:28 pm | Report abuse |
    • RAS

      How about just the beer to settle disputes. Last one that can stand, wins.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:32 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jamz9msu


      September 30, 2010 at 9:02 pm | Report abuse |
  5. rajoe

    Is this the hell or heaven according to Bilble.

    September 30, 2010 at 1:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • Brandon

      Hell would be the side facing the sun, heaven will be the side facing the darkness of space. I'll sign up for the outskirts of hell.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:14 pm | Report abuse |
    • Ol' Yeller

      Why don't we just leave the Bible (and all the thumpers) here.
      Or better yet, send them there.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:07 pm | Report abuse |
    • bree

      ooh ooh! outskirts of hell for me too!

      October 1, 2010 at 2:44 am | Report abuse |
  6. The Anti-Hoff

    pretty arrogant of us to think that because the chemical reactions that give us water and sustain life on this planet will happen exactly the same on others...but it is very interesting and I hope they are smarter than us if there is life there.

    September 30, 2010 at 1:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • dan

      i agree

      -tampa bay, fl – Go rays go!

      September 30, 2010 at 1:46 pm | Report abuse |
    • bandit109

      I don't know if I'd call it arrogance, but rather just working with what we know

      September 30, 2010 at 1:50 pm | Report abuse |
    • Marty

      Arrogant?! I'd say, to live in a universe with trillions of stars and think our planet is the only one that has life on it is arrogant. While we have no evidence that life is on Gliese 581g, it is a certainty that there is water there, and, if life on other planets is like life here, water is a necessary ingredient.

      September 30, 2010 at 1:56 pm | Report abuse |
    • John

      Arrogant? How so? It's called science. You make assumptions based on evidence. one H molecule and 2 O molecues makes H2O....pray tell why would it be different there? comets H2O is present and they are from light years away. So please Mister brilliant tell us all why it's "arrogant" to think this?

      September 30, 2010 at 1:57 pm | Report abuse |
    • Texas Pete

      Actually, the vast majority of the comets are from within .1 light years of earth.

      September 30, 2010 at 1:59 pm | Report abuse |
    • the Marquis

      bandit109 is right.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:00 pm | Report abuse |
    • greg

      Elements are the same throughout the universe. H2O is H2O... being 20 light years away doesn't change water's chemical properties or the processes that form it, or it's status as the building block of life. That's not arrogance, it's just chemistry.

      A lot of people mistakenly ascribe a higher level of complexity to the the workings of the universe than is actually present.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:01 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jeff

      @ant-hoff That's opposite of arrogance. Thinking we have a privileged position in the universe as the only planet with life is arrogant.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:04 pm | Report abuse |
    • VCMD

      And why do we think water is a necessary ingredient for life? A different kind of species in a different environment may be able to grow and survive on different kind of molecules other than H2O.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:07 pm | Report abuse |
    • The Anti-Hoff

      All very valid points – everyone must have just come home from school..being so bright and all. Do all of the items on the periodic table exist all over the universe or just on this planet? maybe, just maybe, there is something out there we dont know that sounds somewhat arrogant to think there may not be something else in the stuff we are perceiving as water which affects life differently than here on this planet.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:16 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jeff

      and if life is carbon based then, with a doubt, water is necessary. It's been theorized that other element such as sulfur or silicon could be the base for life and water wouldn't be necessary. However, the relative scarcity of of these elements and the massive abundance of carbon in the universe makes it improbable that other elements would form the foundation of life.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:21 pm | Report abuse |
    • Martin

      "pretty arrogant of us to think that because the chemical reactions that give us water and sustain life on this planet will happen exactly the same on others"

      Um, they're chemical reactions. They happen exactly the same everywhere. Proving that is the point of science.

      Now, they may not lead to the same outcomes, but they're assuredly going to follow the same process.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:25 pm | Report abuse |
    • floyd

      John, i hate to rain on your parade but i have to correct you.. H2O is not 1 H (hydrogen) molecule and 2 O (oxygen) molecules... you have that backwards... the 2 is a sub script. it's H2-O or H2O1 or dihydrogen monoxide

      September 30, 2010 at 2:25 pm | Report abuse |
    • inglorion


      i asked my astronomy teacher this question...yes its true that there could be other ways to support life than what we know...but you start looking in the areas you are familiar with before you start exploring ideas you do not fully understand.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:26 pm | Report abuse |
    • I know more about science than you

      Wow this thread is interesting. Did any of you pay attention in science class or have you observed the natural world at all...just because the elements and the chemical reactions are the same does not suggest that the species living in that biosphere will be similar or that a biosphere made up of similar chemical reactions will be hospitable. What baffles me is how so many seem to not understand the rarity of planet Earth. We are combing the known universe looking for specs of bacteria on rocks. Compare that to how much life there is on this planet. You may change the species or the contruct of the life in a biosphere, but it is pretty hard to extinguish...just think about that when you read these sensational articles about finding another earth that is barely within the habitable zone or basically, in relatable terms, about where venus is from our sun...not to mention it doesn't rotate and the surface temp. is about -12 C...

      September 30, 2010 at 2:55 pm | Report abuse |
    • bandit109

      Hoff, I completely agree that life does not have to be water or carbon based. But you're missing the point of why we search for these things. It's because that's all we know, not arrogance. We can't search for forms of life that don't revolve around water, when we have no models to tell us how this would be possible. It would be like looking for a needle in a haystack, without knowing what a needle is.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:56 pm | Report abuse |
    • Cristie

      Yes, chemical reactions can occur differently in different conditions (i.e. different gravity, atmosphere, etc). However, since this planet has similar atmosphere and gravity and possibly liquid water at the surface, the logical conclusion is that it could sustain life. Nothing arrogant about that... it's science, baby!

      September 30, 2010 at 3:08 pm | Report abuse |
    • puke at u

      arrogant?!...obviously you have an IQ of less than required to comment rationally, please do us all a favor and refrain from commenting on any science related topic until further notice, thanx

      September 30, 2010 at 3:20 pm | Report abuse |
    • blaze

      @Jeff : You're correct, but there's more! While carbon is about 5 times more abundant than silicon in the universe on the whole, silicon is much more plentiful here on Earth. Carbon and silicon both share ability to form 4 chemical bonds at once. However, carbon has a propensity to form double and triple bonds, making it a much more durable base element for life.

      One would think that if it were possible for life to be silicon-based, it probably would have happened on Earth. While we don't know for sure, of course, the prognosis doesn't look good for silicon-based life

      September 30, 2010 at 4:02 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mike

      We suspect microbes are on asteroids and survive re entry... check out ALH84001.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • Marty

      @I know more about science than you:

      You wrote: What baffles me is how so many seem to not understand the rarity of planet Earth. We are combing the known universe looking for specs of bacteria on rocks. Compare that to how much life there is on this planet.

      We have only been searching for planets around other stars for 15 years. How are you so sure that Earth is rare? We have hardly scratched the surface of finding planets around other stars. And our Milky Way galaxy has a few hundred billion stars in it and it's only one of a few hundred billion galaxies in the universe. I would be very surprised if there aren't lots of planets similar to Earth out there. As scientists keep searching, we'll keep learning more and more. It's premature to say Earth is rare though.

      September 30, 2010 at 5:00 pm | Report abuse |
    • CGB

      if they are smarter then us then they might see us as inferior such as we find monkeys and horses.. just saying

      September 30, 2010 at 6:01 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Aldiggy2000

    damnnnn all day on one side and all night on the other. Just imagine what type of life forms are on the all night side.. scaaary. Bet its like that movie Pitch Black

    September 30, 2010 at 1:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • sf13

      Bet you could sell boatloads of batteries and flashlights on the dark side, and millions of gallons of suntan lotion and sunglasses on the other... Hmmm...the possibilities.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • Guest

      Probably not that many on the night side, though given what we know about the adaptability of life I'd be surprised if there weren't at least some microbes

      September 30, 2010 at 6:01 pm | Report abuse |
  8. dan

    wasn't this planet discovered back in 2007 or was that another Gliese581. either way kepler should find more like these! im excited to know if there are any closer to us!

    September 30, 2010 at 1:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • Brandon

      That was Gliese 581c. It was discovered in 2007.

      September 30, 2010 at 1:53 pm | Report abuse |
    • neoritter

      It was 581d. It's in that Goldilocks zone as well. But it's probably a gas giant.,8599,2022489,00.html?hpt=T2

      September 30, 2010 at 2:05 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jeff

      That other planet is inside the habitable zone too, but it's likely a gas giant

      September 30, 2010 at 2:06 pm | Report abuse |
    • John

      Course, the gas giant might have a bunch of habitable moons, ones that would not be tidally locked.

      I've said for a long time that the Gliese 581 system has got a *lot* of potential. When we develop unmanned probes capable of going that far, that should be the first place we go.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:20 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mr.X

      One side gots a party ALL NIGHT!!! WOOT!!!!!

      September 30, 2010 at 2:45 pm | Report abuse |
  9. Ballz

    maybe there will be 10 foot tall hot blue broads there and we can get our Pandora-on

    September 30, 2010 at 1:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • RM

      only if you smoke a lot of wacky weed first

      September 30, 2010 at 2:05 pm | Report abuse |
  10. JR

    Nanu Nanu...

    September 30, 2010 at 1:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • Scrumps

      What an old-school reference!


      September 30, 2010 at 2:51 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tony


      September 30, 2010 at 3:01 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Brandon

    I'm 100 percent certain there isn't a 100 percent chance of life on that planet.

    September 30, 2010 at 1:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • Sam

      I agree. 100% is not "chance" it's certainty! This article is full of contradictions. No rotation means little in the way of seasons, and who can say what the core of the planet is like? If it is not metallic, it likely has no magnetic field, which means little shield from stellar radiation. Not saying there is no life there, just how can anyone be so sure?

      September 30, 2010 at 1:52 pm | Report abuse |
    • Brian

      If you read the articles written by scientific blogs and sites it says that the scientist that made those comments was speaking completely out of his own personal idea, and not scientific research. Basicly he was just saying what everyone is hoping. Mass media outlets must just have a max word count they can post or something. Hope it doesn't ruin that scientists career by people passing what he said off as his conclusion.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:04 pm | Report abuse |
    • George

      Agreed. The scientist should have known better than to say 100%. I am assuming he was just caught up in the moment.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:10 pm | Report abuse |
    • Matt

      I think the author is saying that there's a 100% certainty that there's a chance for life. So in other words, it's completely valid to say "there's a 100% chance that there's not less than a 0% chance for life to develop."

      Kidof feels like that statement: "60% of the time, it works every time."

      September 30, 2010 at 2:13 pm | Report abuse |
    • Dan N

      Saying there is "100% chance of life" is different than saying "100% there is life".
      He just means that he's 100% sure this planet meets all the requirements for developing life, there thus it is 100% that there is a chance of life on the planet. He doesn't advise the probability of life actually having developed.
      Also note that when a scientist says "life", any organism floating around in a puddle would suffice.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:40 pm | Report abuse |
    • Ryan

      Sam I completely agree. Even the harshest disinfecting chemicals will stop short of the famed 100% The only things that are 100% certain in life are death and taxes my friend. The foolheartedness of that scientist is apparent in his self contradiction, "The chances for life on this planet are 100 percent; I have almost no doubt about it." Almost no doubt ≠ 100% And the necessity for a planet to have a metallic core cannot be understated either. Even the toughest bacteria known to man right now, D. radiodurans, can only survive in 5,000 Gy which is far, far less than the 51,000 Gy the one experiences in space.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:46 pm | Report abuse |
    • Wang Long

      You need to realize that if this planet has condition that's really similar to the earth, then the chance of it having life is extremely high. I would say very close to certainty, because when you really read a little about biology, life is all about chemistry. Biologist had done something very closed to produce "artificial life". Once you put all those elements together, chemistry simply takes over and produce lief. If the conditions are similar, the chemistry that produced life here on earth will do the same on that planet.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:56 pm | Report abuse |
    • Michael

      I agree with Brandon - I'm 100% certain that there isn't a 100% chance of life on that planet. The only way to be 100% certain would be to see it, communicate with it, etc.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:28 pm | Report abuse |
    • Liberty

      It says a 100% "chance", which just means a chance. Now the question is, what are the odds?

      September 30, 2010 at 4:32 pm | Report abuse |
    • Nonimus

      "Personally, given the ubiquity and propensity of life to flourish wherever it can, I would say, my own personal feeling is that the chances of life on this planet are 100 percent," said Steven Vogt,

      This blog should use better quotes. 'course I think the scientist was an idiot to put it this way.

      September 30, 2010 at 4:59 pm | Report abuse |
  12. jrod

    They should name it...Reach...

    September 30, 2010 at 1:46 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jack

      If we name it Reach, the aliens will take it out for sure...

      September 30, 2010 at 2:14 pm | Report abuse |
    • Gord

      I remember Reach

      September 30, 2010 at 3:04 pm | Report abuse |
    • Anon

      Or Harvest

      September 30, 2010 at 4:00 pm | Report abuse |
  13. John

    He doesn't even know for certain that there's water on the planet, and he's 100% certain there's life on it? Okay. Sure.

    September 30, 2010 at 1:46 pm | Report abuse |
    • Wang Long

      Water is about everywhere in the universe.

      September 30, 2010 at 3:59 pm | Report abuse |
  14. SkyLinE

    This is amazing alot of things are about to change for mankind!!!!

    September 30, 2010 at 1:47 pm | Report abuse |
    • sf13

      Yeah. Our taxes are about to go up again!

      September 30, 2010 at 3:49 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Roger

    Chances are the first time we see intelligent aliens, it would be only for a brief moment. The reason I say brief is because they'll probably be performing a maneuver in our Solar System called a gravitational slingshot maneuver aka swing-by. NASA uses this all the time here in our solar system. It's when you approach a planet and use its gravity to accelerate, decelerate, or change your trajectory. This maneuver helps save fuel. Virtually all probes we have sent to explore Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune actually swung by Venus first to build up speed to reach the gas giants. Theoretically this maneuver could be performed during star travel. It's funny that the first time we see aliens they'll probably just be passing by using our star's gravity to get to where they want to go. haha We would probably be like WAIT! COME BACK!

    September 30, 2010 at 1:48 pm | Report abuse |
    • Ballz

      woot for aero-braking

      September 30, 2010 at 1:50 pm | Report abuse |
    • Beasley

      You've been reading "Rendezvous with Rama," haven't you?

      September 30, 2010 at 1:58 pm | Report abuse |
    • Roger

      @Beasley LMAO!

      September 30, 2010 at 2:00 pm | Report abuse |
    • Shiro

      For distances within a solar system ok, but for interstellar travel?? No way unless it was some type of generational ship.
      The distances are just to great for traveling at sub light speeds between stars for any type of gravitational slingshot manoeuvre to be useful.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:09 pm | Report abuse |
    • Shiro


      You've been reading "Rendezvous with Rama," haven't you?"

      That's EXACTLY what I thought.

      Well at least he's reading.
      Gotta work on the practical\logical reasoning though.

      September 30, 2010 at 2:14 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47