For every dead dolphin or whale that washes up on Gulf Coast beaches, there may be 50 more that no one ever sees, a new study suggests.
Natural factors and last year's oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico probably have caused thousands more dolphin and whale deaths than have been observed, a team of scientists says in a study published Wednesday by the journal Conservation Letters.
The scientists, led by Rob Williams, said 101 cetacean, or marine mammal, carcasses had been observed in the water or on beaches as of the time of their study.
After analyzing historical data on populations and death rates of 14 species in the northern Gulf, the scientists determined that carcasses are found in only 2% of cetacean deaths.
"Thus, the true death toll could be 50 times the number of carcasses recovered, given no additional information," they write, adding that they don't know what the true figure is.
The scientists urge environmentalists and authorities not to rely solely on observed carcass counts in judging the severity of an event, but to develop standard formulas for more accurate estimates.
Scientists and observers have been alarmed by the high number of dead baby and preterm dolphins that washed ashore in February during the first calving season since the spill.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fisheries Service counted 36 infant dolphin strandings in February; there was just one in February 2010, and the 2002-2007 average for February is 2.2. Stranding is the scientific term for marine mammals that end up on land.
NOAA had noticed a rise in cetacean deaths even before the spill which resulted from an April 20 explosion and fire on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig that killed 11 workers.
"We have been monitoring an increase of dolphin deaths in the northern Gulf since February of 2010," NOAA Fisheries spokeswoman Karrie Carnes said.
The numbers of stranded (dead or alive) dolphins and whales are shocking: Against a 2002-07 average of 31.4 for January through March, there were 76 for that period in 2010 and 139 in 2011, according to NOAA.
Scientists aren't jumping to conclusions about what's killing the animals. Similar "unusual mortality events" occur from time to time; the Gulf has seen 13 of them since 1991, said Blair Mase, NOAA's lead marine mammal stranding coordinator. Marine mammals are particularly susceptible to harmful algal blooms, infectious diseases, temperature and environmental changes, and human impact, she said.
"Frankly, it's just too early to tell at this point," Mase said in February. "It's obviously on everyone's radar screen. Everyone's concerned about any impact of the BP oil spill, but we have to be very cautious as to identify any particular cause. We won't know until we have these samples analyzed and be able to identify the source."
I believe it. Those biologists know their probability and outcome. I'm glad someone is monitoring.
Agreed, Herbert. And those large mammels are just the obvious that we can see. I imagine the entire food chain in the gulf will be effected for decades.
Theyre still finding that egg shells are affected in Prince William Sound and its been how many years since Exxon?
Unfortunately, the outcome of the BP spill may not be know for years to come; but the news that it may be natural (i.e. algae blooms) gives me a little hope that maybe it's Nature's own culling and not always human mistakes.
In any case, awwwww, poor dolphins!
So nice to see all of you posting together
Beware, fakes will arrive soon
And I mean soon.
Thanks fake david
Your well come
fakes??? i Am new mah real name is tyler
Can the government fine BP every year that they can prove that the habitat is being destroyed or was that a one time fine?
what do fakes 'ave ta do wit it????
Hey ferret you better stay out, you are too stupid to post, the fakers are going to fukk you
@fake david.. Pls tell ferret to stay the fukk out
Tyler.... You don't belong here, as the real david said, stay out or you can be fukked