Comment of the Day:
Someone should have taken the reins away from this woman ages ago. I'm not saying that she has no personal responsibility here, just that she may not be as able to control her impulses as a healthy person. People around her have been enabling her loon ball behavior for years.‚ÄĒAl
Nadya Suleman (more commonly referred to in some circles as ‚ÄúOctomom‚ÄĚ) is no stranger to the criticism surrounding her use of in vitro fertilization to conceive eight children. In this week‚Äôs edition of In Touch magazine, Suleman reportedly commented that babies disgust her and that she is having difficulties raising her six older children. CNN.com readers had a mixed reaction to the reports.
T Colber said ‚ÄúAfter hearing the 'Howard Stern' interview, I believe the press has in some cases exaggerated things she says or does. We all have meltdowns and try to cope with stress, etc. One statement does not make a person or show their behavior.‚ÄĚ
Mark felt that Suleman has little reason for complaint. He said, ‚ÄúWhat really disturbs me is how she portrays herself as the 'victim,' as if these children magically appeared in her life, and now she's stuck with them. Excuse me, but who sought in vitro fertilization, despite already having six children, whom you can't support? Was this immaculate conception? DOUBT IT!!‚ÄĚ
User QS says Suleman should have expected this type of backlash. ‚ÄúSimply having the right to say anything you want does not exempt you from the consequences of the things you say.‚ÄĚ
Austin said, ‚ÄúYes, she needs to be quiet! Every mother has regretted inappropriate thoughts about their own children when stressed, but none should actually voice them and especially never to a reporter!‚ÄĚ
Aquallama said, ‚ÄúWell, I think we all knew she wasn't emotionally stable to begin with. This sounds less like a cry for help and more like a cry for attention and handouts. Child investigative services needs to be visiting this home weekly, if not more.‚ÄĚ
Although a New York judge released former IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn from house arrest today, many CNN.com readers believe that decisions by both the prosecution and the judge were biased in favor of the wealthy and powerful defendant.
Dapzy said, ‚ÄúAs usual, the voiceless, faceless poor woman from the Third World country without the best prosecutors that money can buy, is the victim. Kahn would still be brought to justice. It's just a matter of time.‚ÄĚ
Guest said, ‚ÄúHey, court case is battle for survival, if you got money spend it for freedom.‚ÄĚ
Some users, however, believed that Strauss-Kahn‚Äôs accuser was motivated by money. Reguest said, ‚Äútoo many things didn't add up - It looked like a setup all along.‚ÄĚ
Zungnyaj said, ‚ÄúShe's a poor immigrant services worker; she'll get paid to keep quiet now and the charges will be dropped. The nobility reign again.‚ÄĚ
In Seoul, South Korea, eating dog meat is part of their culture ‚ÄĒ so much so,¬†in fact, that they recently held a dog meat festival. Foods like barbecued paws are considered¬†delicacies. ¬†However, despite this cultural tradition, many Americans have protested the consumption of dog meat. On CNN.com, most commenters expressed revulsion.
DrewNT said, "The problem is that dogs are literally connected to humanity's social evolution. (Long story short: this precedent leads to dogs developing a quasi-human role as social partners, which is why they can be distinguished from other animals.)"
Libby said, "I cannot imagine eating a dog or cat for that matter! And yes, I do eat meat! That is just not right!"
LeeATL said, "This story freaks me out! Eating a dog for me, would be like eating a human being. It's all cultural I understand, but it just seems so backward."
Not everyone drew the line between pets and livestock, though. Tim said, "An animal is an animal is an animal. I raise my own food ‚Äď pigs, chickens, etc., and there is NO difference between killing a pig for food, and a dog."