A calm in the Murdoch storm: What's brewing on the horizon?
A look at how the Murdoch Parliament testimony appeared in papers in Australia, where Murdoch also has a stake in the media.
July 27th, 2011
06:56 PM ET

A calm in the Murdoch storm: What's brewing on the horizon?

In the week since News International executives answered questions from Britain's Parliament on the UK phone hacking scandal, the frenzy has died down a bit, perhaps allowing Rupert Murdoch and his minions to direct the news rather than react to it.

Gone are the daily live blogs and Parliament has been in recess. In the past few days, stories about the troubles of Murdoch's News of the World have not been splashed across front pages as dominantly.

The much-needed time could be exactly what News Corp. needs ahead of some big meetings. And it gives us a chance to see where things stand and where they might be headed.

James Murdoch's place atop the mountain in jeopardy?

Going into the Parliament hearings, most of the focus was squarely on Rupert Murdoch, chairman and CEO of News Corp., but his son James emerged as a true key player in how this story would play out. In the days leading up to and during his testimony, Reuters and other media organizations reported that James Murdoch's position atop News Corp.-controlled satellite company BSkyB would be based on how his testimony went.

Immediately after he testified, things were murky about where he stood. But in the days following, accusations turned the murk into mud.

"Especially troublesome for James Murdoch was last week's public accusation by two former News of the World executives that he misled Parliament about when he learned that illegal reporting practices at the tabloid were more widespread," an article in the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal said.

The disputed testimony in front of Parliament set off a chain reaction of anger from some former workers about how truthful the younger Murdoch had been. "Pressure on James Murdoch Is About to Intensify" a New York Times headline proclaimed.

Fast forward to Wednesday.

It's a day before the BSkyB board is set to meet - and depending on what newspaper or site you read - James Murdoch's fate is either completely doomed or safe as ever.

The New York Times talked to several analysts who paint a grim picture for the younger Murdoch.

“The biggest issue is whether James Murdoch is to remain chairman,” said Steve Liechti, an analyst at Investec Securities in London. “Given the issues going on with News Corp. and James Murdoch’s position within that business, it may be seen that it is not appropriate.”

In the same article, the Times talks with a former financial services minister in the UK, who said he thinks there's a need for a shake-up at the board level. Paul Myners told the Times he thinks that James Murdoch should be out of the chairman spot, but remain on the board in a certain capacity.

"Most corporate problems can be traced back to poor corporate governance and this company falls short in that respect,” he said.

But over at the Guardian, the opinion seems to be that James Murdoch can now rest comfortably at the head of the board table after gaining some important backing.

"James Murdoch is likely to remain chairman of satellite company BSkyB after winning the support of the leading independent director ahead of a crunch meeting later this week," the paper writes. "Nicholas Ferguson, Sky's deputy chairman, is understood to have given Murdoch his backing after a 'long conversation' in a private meeting, despite continuing questions about the role played by Rupert Murdoch's youngest son in the phone-hacking scandal."

Whichever way the pendulum swings, the decision about James Murdoch and any others regarding the scandal out of the board hearing could have bigger implications. The Wall Street Journal writes:

"BSkyB directors, representing the company's shareholders, could be seen as a proxy for News Corp. shareholders, since the companies have many top shareholders in common. That means that any move or signal from BSkyB's board on Mr. Murdoch's status in light of recent events could be an indication of his standing at News Corp., too."

Adding to the fray: An inquiry started by UK media regulator Ofcom, which is looking at whether News Corp. remains "fit and proper" to oversee BSkyB.

What does the public think about that? The UK's Independent reports a survey it conducted showed 65% of those polled agree the scandal means the Murdochs are not "fit and proper" to own any part of BSkyB, with 26% disagreeing with the statement.

The still-unraveling story: How pervasive was hacking and what will the impact be?

According to a New York Times article by David Carr, the scandal itself has splintered the "family business."

"While the family reign seems certain to fracture, the News Corporation’s own fortunes are less predictable. A report by the analyst Michael Nathanson of Nomura Capital Investments nicely captured the moment. The market does not care if you have done bad things; it cares when you get caught."

The British judge leading the government-backed probe into illegal eavesdropping by journalists said he will start ordering people to testify and hand over documents "as soon as possible."

Brian Levenson, the judge, said the inquiry would try to deliver its initial report within a year, as instructed, despite the wide range of subjects it's supposed to cover.

Prime Minister David Cameron announced the inquiry July 13 in response to public fury at the accusation that people working for Rupert Murdoch's News of the World tabloid illegally hacked into the phone of a missing British schoolgirl who was later found dead. Anger from politicians, advertisers and the public almost immediately prompted the closure of the paper, a national institution and one of the best-selling papers in the English-speaking world.

Further accusations that the practice of phone-hacking was widespread, that police bungled an investigation into the practice, and that journalists bribed police have reverberated across the top levels of British power structures.  The scandal spread across the Atlantic with the accusation that papers in Murdoch's News Corp empire may have sought private details about victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks. The Justice Department has opened a probe into those claims.

Add to that the after the elder Murdoch, Rupert, faced Parliament, he's become a target of some former workers at News International.  The Wall Street Journal recounts some of the latest bad news:

"Last Thursday, the paper's most recent editor, Colin Myler, and its longtime top lawyer, Tom Crone, said they told James Murdoch in early 2008 of a crucial e-mail suggesting phone hacking went beyond a single journalist, contradicting the company line, put forward by Mr. Murdoch as recently as last week's hearing, that it didn't become aware that hacking was more widespread until much later. A third man — Jon Chapman, former director of legal affairs at News International — has also indicated he wants to correct 'serious inaccuracies' he claims were aired at the hearing."

The UK's Telegraph newspaper reported that the Parliament committee will ask James Murdoch to clarify his testimony and respond to the allegations.  The paper also reported that in response to the allegations News Corp. said James Murdoch stands by his testimony.

And The New York Times posted an article that questioned Rupert Murdoch's argument to Parliament that he's not as fully engaged in his media empire as many people think, noting that with so many employees, there was no way he could know what was going on at every level of every company. The article dubs him a "fully engaged boss," based on the accounts of other Murdoch veteran employees. One former editor told the paper Murdoch was never disengaged and "reads avidly" from “the best clippings service I have ever seen.'"

“I really didn’t buy that, to be honest,” said Roy Greenslade, a former Murdoch editor who is now a professor of journalism at City University London. “I’m sure he’s not as interfering as he was 20 years ago, but you can see through the way The Sun and The News of the World operate that his word remains law.”

Those series of comments have put a damper on the chances that the Murdochs/News Corp./News International et al. could end this quickly. With the new accusations of lies in the testimony itself, the winds are changing.

"It's a far cry from the sigh of relief some at News Corp. breathed after last week's parliamentary hearing, when the initial feeling was that nothing had transpired to make matters worse for either Murdoch," the article in the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal said.

Then, details of allegedly secret defense briefings regarding Afghanistan began to spill out. The Independent reported that Murdoch, his children, and other senior officials had "extraordinary access" to officials, including "more than two dozen private meetings between the family and senior members of the government in the 15 months since David Cameron entered Downing Street."

"In total, Cabinet ministers have had private meetings with Murdoch executives more than 60 times and, if social events such as receptions at party conferences are included, the figure is at least 107.

"On two occasions, James Murdoch and former News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks were given confidential defense briefings on Afghanistan and Britain's strategic defense review by the Defense Secretary, Liam Fox."

BBC reported that because of concerns about the number of meetings, especially during Murdoch's attempt at the BSkyB/News Corp. merger, "The minutes of those meetings will be published in the coming weeks" and that "minutes of a meeting with media groups opposed to the News Corp. bid will also be published."

A few more developments:

- Trinity Mirror, the publisher of several papers including the Daily Mirror, has launched its own internal investigation regarding phone-hacking practices. The publisher saw a nearly 10% drop in stock immediately after the story broke, the Wall Street Journal reports.

- The entire debacle has the making of a Hollywood story. For now, it will begin on the bookshelves. According to the Hollywood Reporter, the journalist who first broke the Murdoch phone-hacking scandal for the UK's Guardian newspaper, Nick Davies, has scored the first book deal.

But hang on, because the last chapter in this story seems like it is surely yet to be written.

soundoff (61 Responses)
  1. Madame Royale

    Considering that CNN *led* all the bruhaha on this site....pot, meet kettle.

    July 27, 2011 at 7:11 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Reverend John McKane Murdoch


    July 27, 2011 at 7:42 pm | Report abuse |
  3. 12 Step Kettle Meeting

    Hi my name is pot and I'm a kettle..
    "Hello Pot"...
    I first realized a I was a kettle ohhh about 10 years ago. I started looking at other kettles and always saying. Pfft I'm glad I'm not that guy... And then... *Sob sob..* I caught myself boiling water and cooking sauces for anybody... Just anybody willing to grab my handle and get me all hot.. I'm so ashamed..

    July 27, 2011 at 7:54 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mmmmm

      Lol...just wait..when ya pot is old and all danged up...they throwya to the wolves where you get picked up...grope...in either gargage sales or army salvation stores...you never get away from those customers until you sold off and earn ya keep...if you know like I know ya better learn to appreciate those dishwasher moments and short breaks in the

      July 27, 2011 at 8:31 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mmmmm

      ...cuz you might get picked up by that guy who don't have a pot to p!$$ in...

      July 27, 2011 at 8:35 pm | Report abuse |
    • The Artist Formerly Known As Pot

      @Mmm.. Very profound indeed. Thank you.. I say the same things, but this stupid cult keeps trying to drag me in, so they can belittle me, force feed me cheap coffee, turn me into a chain smoker.. I'm truly frightened.. Think I will just take up pottery.. ba doom ching..

      July 27, 2011 at 8:43 pm | Report abuse |
    • Pot

      I'm a male pot.. NO man is urinating on me.. I'd let Courtney Kardashian make me her own personal bidet though.. HAHA..

      July 27, 2011 at 10:14 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Chivato News Network

    *Whisper whisper* Let's ignore Peirce Morgan..

    July 27, 2011 at 8:15 pm | Report abuse |
  5. Jason D

    The murdocks deserve the full attention and hatred of the biritsh people and those in america, they have made lies up, bribed, hacked, edited video, edited audio and yet the boss knows nothing about it, his people are terrified to even bring things up he decrees should not be uttered, hes fired people for telling the truth and hired people who have lied and still are, he hired right wing extremists and mingles with the sickest twisted Ayn Rand followers on the planet but thinks hes just an old man who doesnt know much, well that BS statement ran out with reagan, hes a fox that would kill every chicken in the shed for a dime,l end his reign and the reign of the other murdocks and offspring who change their names to avoid the mud that names invoces in every group with even a smidgen of morality

    July 27, 2011 at 8:20 pm | Report abuse |
  6. Byrd

    What's ahead for the Morlock? The end of Freemasonry.

    July 27, 2011 at 8:20 pm | Report abuse |
    • Duck

      No the Carlyle Group will take over.

      July 27, 2011 at 10:29 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tony Gerard Professional Crazy Person

      You just don't get it do you? This is bigger than multinational corporations! If you'd only read into it yourself then you'd know that our leaders are being controlled telepathically by ZoRon(click click pop) in an effort to sustain their unquenchable thirst for kool aid, by ruining the global economy, so nobody has any money to buy kool aid and therefore making it cheap enough to steal large quant ities that nobody will miss. Buy all the kool aid you can now, so you have something to bargain with when they begin using us as slave labor in the kool aid mines on their home world of Kronlimz. I hear if you cover yourself in horse manure they can't read your mind or see you..

      July 27, 2011 at 11:23 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Chivato News Network

    @Jason: He's an instigator. He also has shows that are generally pretty liberal .. It's all sensationalism and rumors depicted as fact and its purpose is to spin the viewer in circles while he cashes in. Politicians do it as well. He's just the tentacle of a bigger creature.

    July 27, 2011 at 8:27 pm | Report abuse |
    • The Måd Råp3r

      He certainly is a tentacle, or is it that other word?

      July 27, 2011 at 9:27 pm | Report abuse |
    • Slumlord Millionaire

      I'm sure he's a wide variety of "tacle"

      July 27, 2011 at 10:32 pm | Report abuse |
  8. JusticeAcoming

    Papers outside NC are now starting to be implicated, including The Mirror. This was once edited by a certain Piers Morgan.
    Predictions :-
    Murdoch Jr to be arrested within a week.
    1 in 5 chance Cameron resigns this summer.
    Morgan extradited to UK in October. This is when police have indicated charges will be made.
    Murdoch and Brooks will both do 5 years for interception, computer misuse and perverting the course of justice.
    Morgan will do 3 years for the first 2 charges.
    Cameron will take Morgans job at CNN.
    The Queen will have Boris Johnson as a new boyfriend and therefore he will be the new PM.

    July 27, 2011 at 8:31 pm | Report abuse |
  9. tlmess

    press on, prosecute, suspend FCC lisences. If you or I were bribing public officials, we would be brought to justice. proceed...

    July 27, 2011 at 8:31 pm | Report abuse |
  10. PhilG.

    Murdoch has escaped relatively unfazed.

    The uproar is over and everything will go back to hacking as usual.

    No charges will be brought that will ever stick to anyone.

    It's all a show now.

    Must be nice to be filthy rich and own more people in the British government then the Queen.

    July 27, 2011 at 8:40 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Chinese tourist

    Ooooooh. Muhdok ahn he minion get big butt-squew. Weaewy weawy hahd. Weawy hahd. Bye bye Wupurt. Maybe you go home now no pay.

    July 27, 2011 at 8:47 pm | Report abuse |
  12. John Wayne [rest in peace]

    Well Rupert. What have you got to say for yourself. Yeah? Weel that's not good enough. BAM! Pow! slug backhand kick in gut. (dusting his hat off) Awe! What the hell.. (boots him in the gut) walks down the street pausing to pat a kid on the head, tips his hat just as the last ray of sun flickers that gleam in Mr. Wayne's eyes. Salute.

    July 27, 2011 at 8:54 pm | Report abuse |
  13. Jazzzzzzzz

    I was watching C-Span bout a week ago and the parliment was giving Prime Minister Cameron a rather good lashing for hiring that thung.

    July 27, 2011 at 9:11 pm | Report abuse |
    • Nighthawk

      @Jazz: I suspect it's all for show. The proof is in the results, not the appearance.

      July 27, 2011 at 9:26 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Jazzzzzzzz

    The appearance being a diversion. Just like our country. There not a Government in this world who doesn't stick their hands where they DON'T belong.

    July 27, 2011 at 9:30 pm | Report abuse |
    • Wait and See

      Well they have already lost one newspaper and the chance to fully own a broadcaster. The police investigation is still ongoing and Parliament won't do anything to interfere with that. There will be criminal charges and trials. They will likely be forced to sell what they do own of Sky. None of this is in the hands of the government. Murdoch is finished in the UK.

      July 27, 2011 at 10:08 pm | Report abuse |
  15. raven

    Im still stuck on the fact that Jr lied to parliament , no WAY!! he wouldnt do THAT would he ??

    July 27, 2011 at 9:43 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3