The buzz behind 7 billion people: A milestone and a warning
October 26th, 2011
12:46 PM ET

The buzz behind 7 billion people: A milestone and a warning

Trying to assess the importance of the United Nations' upcoming celebration of the global population reaching 7 billion is sort of like trying to assess the meaning of life.

As the countdown clock to the date keeps ticking, and people keep buzzing about the number, many are trying to figure out the real importance of hitting that marker.

The Wall Street Journal proposed the question: "How Do You Get to 7 Billion People?" The article raised the question: Exactly how do you know that we are reaching this symbolic number on a date set by the United Nations, given that some countries don't have full census data?

"The world's population will hit seven billion on Oct. 31. Or maybe not until next year. Or maybe it has already happened.

"No one knows for sure. But that hasn't stopped the United Nations from picking the last day of the month as the symbolic date, christening it as 7 Billion Day."

Perhaps the occasion will allow us to realize that we need to pay more attention to better tracking our growth and impact - our literal footprint on Earth. For some, there will be the typical celebrations: a baby wrapped in a blanket declared the 7 billionth person to enter this world as hospitals debate which baby was actually the one that hit the marker, similar to what has happened with milestones in the past.  (If you're curious where you fall in the mix, Population Action International has a handy "What's your number?" interactive based on your birth date.)

But it seems like this time around, if social media and traditional media are any indication, this milestone is about a little more than just balloons and fanfare. The Wall Street Journal wrote:

"While seven billion is a nice round number, knowing the identity of the lucky baby or the exact moment the threshold is crossed isn't really any more important than pulling over to the side of the road to bask in your car's 100,000th mile. But the building blocks for world population estimates — national demographic statistics and characteristics — are used by governments, businesses and aid groups to plan spending and spot potential trouble spots."

In a growing and ever-changing economic and technological world, this may be the time to look at where we've been, what we're going through now and what challenges lie ahead for such a massive population.

iReport: What does 7 billion look like

And with movements like Occupy Wall Street spreading across the globe to share growing discontent about government institutions' ability to deal with our problems and growing debt, the 7 billion mark poses questions about whether those concerns will be passed on to future generations.

"The milestone of 7 billion is marked by achievements, setbacks and paradoxes," a United Nations Population Fund report begins. (Read the report in PDF form)

The U.N. says it believes the world can thrive as it reaches the milestone, but the report also looks at the ways that countries are growing and changing, as well as how they can tackle critical challenges and prepare for the arrival of billions more people this century. Those challenges include empowering young people with economic opportunities; planning for the growth of cities; developing programs to share and sustain the Earth's resources; and improving education, including sexual education.

The U.N. has teamed up with the company SAP to help make those decisions easier by creating a widget on the site 7billionactions.org that allows you to assess the world's population by age, socioeconomic status and education levels, and to compare trends from country to country. The goal is to help governments assess their needs for the future.

After all, with more people comes the need for more resources.

Jeffrey D. Sachs, the director of The Earth Institute at Columbia University, writing for CNN, says the occasion marks a huge task for us.

"The arrival of the 7 billionth person is cause for profound global concern. It carries a challenge: What will it take to maintain a planet in which each person has a chance for a full, productive and prosperous life, and in which the planet's resources are sustained for future generations?

"How, in short, can we enjoy 'sustainable development' on a very crowded planet?"

That crowded planet may cause some global issues. Those include the health concerns caused by the waste that 7 billion people create, according to a LiveScience report on MSNBC.com.

MSNBC's photo blog takes a visual look at the effect that we have on the world each day and how we tax the environment: through deforestation, pollution from developing countries and traffic jams, as well as the struggle to cultivate all of the food and crops necessary to feed our growing population. That imprint will only grow as more of us inhabit the planet, the accompanying article says.

And Roger Martin's article in the UK's Guardian newspaper says the growing population could cost us the planet we live on in the way we now know it.

"Every additional person needs food, water and energy, and produces more waste and pollution, so ratchets up our total impact on the planet, and ratchets down everyone else's share – the rich far more than the poor. By definition, total impact and consumption are worked out by measuring the average per person multiplied by the number of people. Thus all environmental (and many economic and social) problems are easier to solve with fewer people, and ultimately impossible with ever more."

"On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.

TV One in New Zealand took a look at the meaning of the number, but from the perspective of the tax burden it may bring on a growing population of aging people.

"Richard Bedford, an expert on population changes from Waikato University, told TV ONE's Breakfast, that young taxpayers' ability to cope is 'the big $64,000 question.'

"By 2030, more than a third of the population in a number of Western countries will be aged over 65."

For some, the projection has come with gloom and doom and questions of "are we prepared?" for the population growth ahead.

A National Geographic cover story from January, titled "Population 7 Billion," examined the history behind the global moment and fascination with how well and how long our civilization can continue to coexist with our surroundings.

"For centuries population pessimists have hurled apocalyptic warnings at the congenital optimists, who believe in their bones that humanity will find ways to cope and even improve its lot. History, on the whole, has so far favored the optimists, but history is no certain guide to the future. Neither is science," Robert Kunzig wrote. "It cannot predict the outcome of People v. Planet, because all the facts of the case — how many of us there will be and how we will live — depend on choices we have yet to make and ideas we have yet to have."

soundoff (778 Responses)
  1. fred

    750 million born every year tmore than the number who die. Work it out !! 7 billion !! You aint seen nothing yet – and you won't – the real problem comes about 75 years from now.

    October 26, 2011 at 4:01 pm | Report abuse |
    • Kilstorm

      I believe its 75 million not 750 million.

      October 26, 2011 at 4:21 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Mike,Albany

    Reproduction should not be a right, it should be privilege. Prospective parents should be selected based on factors such as education level, income, genetics, and a favorable psychological profile that indicates a low probability for child abuse, i.e., that they can handle the stresses of child rearing. Do this, and not only will you see population return to more manageable levels, but you will also see that population with a higher overall intelligence level that will be more likely to solve problems that create them.

    October 26, 2011 at 4:02 pm | Report abuse |
    • Nate from Chicago

      i actually like this idea. This was actually required in the movie "Starship Troopers" lol. You had to be on a certain level to get a license to have children. awesome suggestion

      October 26, 2011 at 4:06 pm | Report abuse |
    • OKtoKill

      There should at least be a minimum IQ test required before you're granted the right to have children.

      And - in the United States - if you're not able to understand and pass that test if it's given in English... tough sh!t, you're sterilized on the spot.

      October 26, 2011 at 4:08 pm | Report abuse |
    • DSY in Canada

      Wow, you are talking eugenics, and Hitler kind of stuff.

      October 26, 2011 at 4:14 pm | Report abuse |
    • OKtoKill

      Spare me the Hitler analogy. For the record, however, his only flaw was targeting race, not intelligence.

      October 26, 2011 at 4:15 pm | Report abuse |
  3. bipar

    use more gardasil like the u.s.wants and it will slow the population

    October 26, 2011 at 4:02 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Weck nation

    The world is not overpopulation. IT IS NOT. SEE POPULATION DECLINE. SEE BIRTH RATE..

    October 26, 2011 at 4:02 pm | Report abuse |
  5. Nate from Chicago

    Even Michael Jackson said it in his lyrics "if you can't feed ya baby, then don't have a baby"

    October 26, 2011 at 4:03 pm | Report abuse |
  6. OKtoKill

    Of those 7 billion people, how many are actual worth anything to society? 2 billion? 3? Would it be that many?

    Seven billion sacks of skin and sh!t are too many. We need to become a lot more comfortable with ridding the planet of worthless people, very quickly. There's too many of them taking resources from the intelligent and worthwhile contributors to society.

    October 26, 2011 at 4:03 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Chaz

    All beatiful people to the LEFT...all ugly people to the RIGHT....NOW "LIGHT" THE GROUP ON THE RIGHT. Problem solved lol

    October 26, 2011 at 4:04 pm | Report abuse |
    • Nate from Chicago

      what do we do about the chubby chasers? who will they love?

      October 26, 2011 at 4:09 pm | Report abuse |
  8. ajgorm

    I have a population explosion going on , roof rats . Seems they are comming from OWS !.

    October 26, 2011 at 4:06 pm | Report abuse |
  9. ajgorm

    No wonder the bankers are taking us over with Ponzi schemes. Plenty of sheep to feed on. Maybe we can give them some more of our money while were at it !

    October 26, 2011 at 4:08 pm | Report abuse |
  10. ajgorm

    I see the writting on the wall and it aint gonna be cute.

    October 26, 2011 at 4:09 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Weck

    DECEMBER 21, 2012 population will go DOWN GRADE!!!

    October 26, 2011 at 4:10 pm | Report abuse |
  12. Weck

    STOP LYING and say the world is overpopulation. HOW ABOUT STOP MARRY PEOPLE!
    YEAH THAT'S BETTER!!!

    October 26, 2011 at 4:11 pm | Report abuse |
    • stuntborg

      Nice one! But...what are you talking about?

      October 26, 2011 at 4:20 pm | Report abuse |
    • Weck

      Abomination.... People will copy. Just like Egypt riot. Wall Street Occupy. It's human sacrifice to Gods. It's not subject for ISRAEL. It's subject for islam, other religion.

      October 26, 2011 at 4:28 pm | Report abuse |
  13. hi

    Its me. # 5,307,450,307 Just wanted to let you all know that we have long passed 7 billion..... in fact i was having lunch with # 6,945,760,134 the other day and she mentioned that close to half a billion people are not even accounted for.

    October 26, 2011 at 4:11 pm | Report abuse |
    • The Unaccounted for

      Hey! when was role call?! Must've been while I was doing some 'internet research'

      October 26, 2011 at 4:38 pm | Report abuse |
  14. ajgorm

    Dog eat dog we either eat them or they will eat us so we ate gadhafi and a few more . OIL...ummm

    October 26, 2011 at 4:12 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Margret

    Just think in less than 20 years there will be enough Muslims in the U,S,A, to put one in office,,..

    October 26, 2011 at 4:12 pm | Report abuse |
    • OKtoKill

      Yet another reason why I've chosen not to bring children into this world.

      October 26, 2011 at 4:14 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28