Russia: Address concerns or we'll target missile shield
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev speaks about NATO's planned missile shield from his residence in Gorki on Wednesday.
November 23rd, 2011
03:10 PM ET

Russia: Address concerns or we'll target missile shield

Russia may deploy missiles that it says could destroy NATO’s planned missile defense system in Europe - and withdraw from an arms control treaty with the United States - if Russia’s concerns about the shield aren’t addressed, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Wednesday.

Medvedev also announced that Russia will take a series of immediate steps that includes equipping new ballistic missiles “with advanced missile defense penetration systems” and drawing up plans to disable missile shield guidance systems.

“If (those immediate steps) prove insufficient, the Russian Federation will deploy modern offensive weapon systems in the west and south of the country, ensuring our ability to take out any part of the U.S. missile defense system in Europe,” Medvedev said in a live address on Russian television. “One step in this process will be to deploy Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad region.”

Russia also could pull out of the New START arms control agreement with the United States that Medvedev and U.S. President Barack Obama signed a year and a half ago.

“Conditions for our withdrawal from the New START Treaty could also arise, and this option is enshrined in the treaty,” Medvedev said.

Although NATO has said that the shield will protect Europe from attacks from areas such as the Middle East and not from Russia, the Russian government is concerned that the shield is meant to undermine its nuclear deterrent.

NATO has offered to have Russia participate in the shield, but Russia has said it is not satisfied with negotiations. Russia wants legally binding guarantees that the system won’t be used against it. The Obama administration has made clear that the president will not sign such a document.

“Our requests that they set this out on paper in the form of clear legal obligations are firmly rejected,” Medvedev said. “We will not agree to take part in a program that in a short while, in some six to eight years’ time, could weaken our nuclear deterrent capability.”

The United States and NATO are planning a missile defense shield using land- and sea-based SM-3 interceptors in places such as in Poland and Romania. Turkey would be one of the countries hosting radar systems for the project.

Last month, Ellen Tauscher, the U.S. State Department undersecretary for arms control and international security, told the Atlantic Council Missile Defense Conference in Washington that NATO hopes to declare an initial missile defense capability at its summit in Chicago in May. The last phase, in which the shield would cover all European NATO allies, has a 2018 target date, she said.

Tommy Vietor, spokesman for the U.S. National Security Council, said Wednesday that the United States “has been open and transparent with Russia on our plans for missile defense in Europe, which reflect a growing threat to our allies from Iran that we are committed to deterring.”

“In multiple channels, we have explained to Russian officials that the missile defense systems planned for deployment in Europe do not and cannot threaten Russia’s strategic deterrent," Vietor said. "Implementation of the New START Treaty is going well, and we see no basis for threats to withdraw from it.

“We continue to believe that cooperation with Russia on missile defense can enhance the security of the United States, our allies in Europe and Russia, and we will continue to work with Russia to define the parameters of possible cooperation. However, in pursuing this cooperation, we will not in any way limit or change our deployment plans in Europe.”

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Wednesday that the “suggestion that deployment of missiles in the areas neighboring the alliance is an appropriate response to NATO’s system is very disappointing.”

“Such deployments would be reminiscent of the past and are inconsistent with the strategic relations NATO and Russia have agreed they seek and with the spirit of the dialogue, including on missile defense issues, that they are currently conducting,” he said in a statement released by NATO.

Still, Rasmussen welcomed Medvedev's “willingness not to close the door on continued dialogue with NATO and the U.S. on missile defense and to consider practical cooperation in this area.”

Tauscher said last month that as a partner in the system, Russia would “continue to be able to confirm that the system is directed against launches originating outside Europe and not from Russia.” She also said that the system will have “no capability to counter Russian strategic forces, given their location, numbers and advanced technology.”

She said the United States is willing to give Russia a guarantee in writing but not make it a legal matter. “We cannot provide legally binding commitments, nor can we agree to limitations on missile defenses, which must necessarily keep pace with the evolution of the threat. But through cooperation we can demonstrate the inherent characteristics of the system and its inability to undermine Russian deterrent forces or strategic ability,” she said last month.

Medvedev said Wednesday that Russia is “ready to discuss additional modifications to the system, taking into account our NATO partners’ views” and will “continue the dialogue with the USA and NATO on this issue.”

“There is still time to reach an understanding,” Medvedev said. “Russia has the political will to reach the agreements needed in this area, agreements that would open a new chapter in our relations with the USA and NATO."

Post by: ,
Filed under: Military • NATO • Russia
soundoff (723 Responses)
  1. James

    Time to buy stock in defense companies... Follow the $.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:14 pm | Report abuse |
  2. rlowens

    With our now permanent track record of pre-emptively, and wrongly, striking those we perceive as enemies, I totally understand their concern. Thank you, GWB, and the rest of the Chicken Littles in Washington D.C. The world totally trusts us, now.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:15 pm | Report abuse |
  3. ajgorm

    ring ring-> it is 3 am !

    November 23, 2011 at 8:15 pm | Report abuse |
  4. ajgorm

    We are programmed for self destruct . The Alien Plan !

    November 23, 2011 at 8:16 pm | Report abuse |
  5. the pope

    Time to break out the " HOLY HAND GRENADE".

    November 23, 2011 at 8:17 pm | Report abuse |
    • djwazu

      Ha ha Ilmfao! Holy cow!!!! lol

      November 23, 2011 at 8:26 pm | Report abuse |
  6. ajgorm

    I want a free trade bill with a nuclear war clause ehh !

    November 23, 2011 at 8:17 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jaybob

      Who told you to post such an unfunny, meaningless, senseless and idiotic comment like that? The rest of us are serious here. Unless you have something to say here, kindly quit boring us, will you???

      November 23, 2011 at 8:22 pm | Report abuse |
    • ajgorm

      oh sorry your words are so harsh and to the point they are so over whelming ohh my stop it..

      November 23, 2011 at 8:33 pm | Report abuse |
  7. indigo

    Russia is acting like they don't know the cold war is over.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:19 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jayson

      The New Cold War has begun. Russia seems very concerned about their missles capability to successfully re-enter over the West. Hmmm...DEAR NATO: LEAVE GEORGIA AND UKRAINE A L O N E!!!!! HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF THEY TRIED TO ADMIT MEXICO AND CANADA TO THEIR SOCIALIST CLUB??

      November 23, 2011 at 8:30 pm | Report abuse |
  8. Skipper

    Going to aim the missiles at the shield?? Well, that's what the shield is for.....

    November 23, 2011 at 8:19 pm | Report abuse |
  9. ajgorm

    “with advanced missile defense penetration systems” and drawing up plans to disable missile shield guidance systems.// We know ...drones rule ! SORRY you lose again...FEAR MONGERS !

    November 23, 2011 at 8:19 pm | Report abuse |
  10. benina

    I've lived in me, America has nothing to worry about

    November 23, 2011 at 8:20 pm | Report abuse |
    • Joey Isotta-Fraschini

      Thank you, benina. I trust you but it's too bad that these uneducated lemmins don't. They know nothing about Russia itself and are stupid enough to believe this lying government!!!

      November 23, 2011 at 8:27 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Joey Isotta-Fraschini

    @ Trish Taylor, 7:27:
    There are so many good and rationally religious persons here that I have to refrain from telling you fully how completely off-the-wall your "interpretation" of the Bible is.
    You are using the Bible as if were a horoscope in a supermarket journal like the Inquirer.
    I know that you are convinced that you are doing a good thing.
    Actually, you are being a very bad advertisement for Christianity.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:20 pm | Report abuse |
  12. tomn8r

    i remember back in the early 60's going to elementary school; a vw van rode by with 'ban the bomb' scrawled on it. since then i've had kids, had a complete life. a great one at that. so just b prepared for the worst and live your life. a great one.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:20 pm | Report abuse |
  13. big oil

    Extremely easy to drill for oil through a glass parking lot.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:20 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Mojo

    The US actions in the Asia Pacific area to encircle China with American military bases can only cause China to step up its own defense spending and even set up Chinese military bases in other areas of the world. To every action there is a reaction. Obama has proven to be very hawkish and not very peace loving.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:21 pm | Report abuse |
    • Joey Isotta-Fraschini

      How so very true that rings, Mojo! Barack Obama is a warmonger with more blood on his hands that all the members of the Chicago mob put together. He needs to be both indicted and tried for his war crimes!!!

      November 23, 2011 at 8:34 pm | Report abuse |
  15. ajgorm

    If they dont look out they will send the NTC and rebels after them. Hilary can do that behind the scene war thing they talk about to get things done at the UN ..uhuh

    November 23, 2011 at 8:25 pm | Report abuse |
    • ajgorm

      Sorry, someone seems to be trying to make a fool out of me by posting all these meaningless comments under my name! I wish that it would just stop!

      November 23, 2011 at 8:37 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26