Russia: Address concerns or we'll target missile shield
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev speaks about NATO's planned missile shield from his residence in Gorki on Wednesday.
November 23rd, 2011
03:10 PM ET

Russia: Address concerns or we'll target missile shield

Russia may deploy missiles that it says could destroy NATO’s planned missile defense system in Europe - and withdraw from an arms control treaty with the United States - if Russia’s concerns about the shield aren’t addressed, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Wednesday.

Medvedev also announced that Russia will take a series of immediate steps that includes equipping new ballistic missiles “with advanced missile defense penetration systems” and drawing up plans to disable missile shield guidance systems.

“If (those immediate steps) prove insufficient, the Russian Federation will deploy modern offensive weapon systems in the west and south of the country, ensuring our ability to take out any part of the U.S. missile defense system in Europe,” Medvedev said in a live address on Russian television. “One step in this process will be to deploy Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad region.”

Russia also could pull out of the New START arms control agreement with the United States that Medvedev and U.S. President Barack Obama signed a year and a half ago.

“Conditions for our withdrawal from the New START Treaty could also arise, and this option is enshrined in the treaty,” Medvedev said.

Although NATO has said that the shield will protect Europe from attacks from areas such as the Middle East and not from Russia, the Russian government is concerned that the shield is meant to undermine its nuclear deterrent.

NATO has offered to have Russia participate in the shield, but Russia has said it is not satisfied with negotiations. Russia wants legally binding guarantees that the system won’t be used against it. The Obama administration has made clear that the president will not sign such a document.

“Our requests that they set this out on paper in the form of clear legal obligations are firmly rejected,” Medvedev said. “We will not agree to take part in a program that in a short while, in some six to eight years’ time, could weaken our nuclear deterrent capability.”

The United States and NATO are planning a missile defense shield using land- and sea-based SM-3 interceptors in places such as in Poland and Romania. Turkey would be one of the countries hosting radar systems for the project.

Last month, Ellen Tauscher, the U.S. State Department undersecretary for arms control and international security, told the Atlantic Council Missile Defense Conference in Washington that NATO hopes to declare an initial missile defense capability at its summit in Chicago in May. The last phase, in which the shield would cover all European NATO allies, has a 2018 target date, she said.

Tommy Vietor, spokesman for the U.S. National Security Council, said Wednesday that the United States “has been open and transparent with Russia on our plans for missile defense in Europe, which reflect a growing threat to our allies from Iran that we are committed to deterring.”

“In multiple channels, we have explained to Russian officials that the missile defense systems planned for deployment in Europe do not and cannot threaten Russia’s strategic deterrent," Vietor said. "Implementation of the New START Treaty is going well, and we see no basis for threats to withdraw from it.

“We continue to believe that cooperation with Russia on missile defense can enhance the security of the United States, our allies in Europe and Russia, and we will continue to work with Russia to define the parameters of possible cooperation. However, in pursuing this cooperation, we will not in any way limit or change our deployment plans in Europe.”

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Wednesday that the “suggestion that deployment of missiles in the areas neighboring the alliance is an appropriate response to NATO’s system is very disappointing.”

“Such deployments would be reminiscent of the past and are inconsistent with the strategic relations NATO and Russia have agreed they seek and with the spirit of the dialogue, including on missile defense issues, that they are currently conducting,” he said in a statement released by NATO.

Still, Rasmussen welcomed Medvedev's “willingness not to close the door on continued dialogue with NATO and the U.S. on missile defense and to consider practical cooperation in this area.”

Tauscher said last month that as a partner in the system, Russia would “continue to be able to confirm that the system is directed against launches originating outside Europe and not from Russia.” She also said that the system will have “no capability to counter Russian strategic forces, given their location, numbers and advanced technology.”

She said the United States is willing to give Russia a guarantee in writing but not make it a legal matter. “We cannot provide legally binding commitments, nor can we agree to limitations on missile defenses, which must necessarily keep pace with the evolution of the threat. But through cooperation we can demonstrate the inherent characteristics of the system and its inability to undermine Russian deterrent forces or strategic ability,” she said last month.

Medvedev said Wednesday that Russia is “ready to discuss additional modifications to the system, taking into account our NATO partners’ views” and will “continue the dialogue with the USA and NATO on this issue.”

“There is still time to reach an understanding,” Medvedev said. “Russia has the political will to reach the agreements needed in this area, agreements that would open a new chapter in our relations with the USA and NATO."

Post by: ,
Filed under: Military • NATO • Russia
soundoff (723 Responses)
  1. Krakalakin

    Oh come on russia, you tried an arms race before, and it destroyed your dysfunctional economy, and your crappy communist empire fell apart....what can you possibly hope to achieve by it this time around??

    November 23, 2011 at 8:26 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jayson


      November 23, 2011 at 8:36 pm | Report abuse |
    • TheRussian

      A nuke up your azz will keep you quite. That's the arms race

      November 23, 2011 at 8:38 pm | Report abuse |
  2. big oil

    Yeah but yoi can see that fence around China from the space shuttle. And it didn't keep any one out because it was never electrified.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:26 pm | Report abuse |
  3. Zygmund

    BLOW it out your AZZ, Russia!

    November 23, 2011 at 8:27 pm | Report abuse |

    Sounds like Russia has made investments in Iran...

    November 23, 2011 at 8:28 pm | Report abuse |
  5. Tewrobert

    He looks Gay!!

    November 23, 2011 at 8:28 pm | Report abuse |
    • Steve Dalllas look gay

      November 23, 2011 at 8:35 pm | Report abuse |
  6. OrionStyles

    Russia is mad because they had alot of orbital tech that couldn't be targeted by this shield, and they were dismantled with the START treaty.

    So ultra nationalism aside, they kind of have a point... We asked them to disarm certain orbital weapons in the agreement, and now we are going to put up a shield that affects everything BUT the previous orbital weapons they gave up. So they warn us that they will abandon the treaty, and people get mad? If the roles were reversed, you'd be a crazy person to agree with that.

    Oh well I guess.... back to stock piling 1000s of warheads on both sides to ensure there are enough remaining for retaliation after a preemptive strike?

    November 23, 2011 at 8:28 pm | Report abuse |
  7. ajgorm

    What is the word they use to describe people willing to push the button the fanatics that are leading these countries ? is it mad men ?

    November 23, 2011 at 8:29 pm | Report abuse |
  8. ajgorm

    If it is determined that the leraders of any country are mad enough to use these weapons it should give immediate reason to we the people to remove these fanatixs from ruling militaries without democracy. Take away the powers act and start from there and boot the UN..

    November 23, 2011 at 8:31 pm | Report abuse |
  9. jd

    to close to comfort. i will keep my missiles deploy and my finger on the button. after all we have done around the muslin world no wonder nobody trust U.S.A.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:31 pm | Report abuse |
  10. rikers

    We need another John F. Kennedy in the White House. And Obama is definitely not a Kennedy clone. As a matter of fact I don't believe he's even addressed the situation.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:32 pm | Report abuse |
    • Grace Of The Witch

      You freaking Republicans make me sick.

      Obama could cure cancer
      fix the hole in the ozone layer,
      make blind people see,
      and thats all you will do, is find something else to beetch about.

      Republicanism is a disease that i dont want to catch.

      November 23, 2011 at 8:40 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Ronald

    What? Someone's is questioning the USA's righteousness? How dare they!

    November 23, 2011 at 8:32 pm | Report abuse |
  12. Herman

    Russians have oligarchs with black sea Villas. Chinese have communist mafioso with Hong Kong.
    Two different kinds of communisms. Keep that in mind.
    Where is Libya ?

    November 23, 2011 at 8:34 pm | Report abuse |
  13. Monitor

    The silly games you earth people play.

    November 23, 2011 at 8:34 pm | Report abuse |
  14. gustavo

    Well here we go. WW3 should be right around the corner now...

    November 23, 2011 at 8:35 pm | Report abuse |
  15. ajgorm

    This is for serious people that want to blow up the world over IRAN. WAR is a necessity GET over it and move in ..

    November 23, 2011 at 8:35 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26