Russia: Address concerns or we'll target missile shield
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev speaks about NATO's planned missile shield from his residence in Gorki on Wednesday.
November 23rd, 2011
03:10 PM ET

Russia: Address concerns or we'll target missile shield

Russia may deploy missiles that it says could destroy NATO’s planned missile defense system in Europe - and withdraw from an arms control treaty with the United States - if Russia’s concerns about the shield aren’t addressed, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Wednesday.

Medvedev also announced that Russia will take a series of immediate steps that includes equipping new ballistic missiles “with advanced missile defense penetration systems” and drawing up plans to disable missile shield guidance systems.

“If (those immediate steps) prove insufficient, the Russian Federation will deploy modern offensive weapon systems in the west and south of the country, ensuring our ability to take out any part of the U.S. missile defense system in Europe,” Medvedev said in a live address on Russian television. “One step in this process will be to deploy Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad region.”

Russia also could pull out of the New START arms control agreement with the United States that Medvedev and U.S. President Barack Obama signed a year and a half ago.

“Conditions for our withdrawal from the New START Treaty could also arise, and this option is enshrined in the treaty,” Medvedev said.

Although NATO has said that the shield will protect Europe from attacks from areas such as the Middle East and not from Russia, the Russian government is concerned that the shield is meant to undermine its nuclear deterrent.

NATO has offered to have Russia participate in the shield, but Russia has said it is not satisfied with negotiations. Russia wants legally binding guarantees that the system won’t be used against it. The Obama administration has made clear that the president will not sign such a document.

“Our requests that they set this out on paper in the form of clear legal obligations are firmly rejected,” Medvedev said. “We will not agree to take part in a program that in a short while, in some six to eight years’ time, could weaken our nuclear deterrent capability.”

The United States and NATO are planning a missile defense shield using land- and sea-based SM-3 interceptors in places such as in Poland and Romania. Turkey would be one of the countries hosting radar systems for the project.

Last month, Ellen Tauscher, the U.S. State Department undersecretary for arms control and international security, told the Atlantic Council Missile Defense Conference in Washington that NATO hopes to declare an initial missile defense capability at its summit in Chicago in May. The last phase, in which the shield would cover all European NATO allies, has a 2018 target date, she said.

Tommy Vietor, spokesman for the U.S. National Security Council, said Wednesday that the United States “has been open and transparent with Russia on our plans for missile defense in Europe, which reflect a growing threat to our allies from Iran that we are committed to deterring.”

“In multiple channels, we have explained to Russian officials that the missile defense systems planned for deployment in Europe do not and cannot threaten Russia’s strategic deterrent," Vietor said. "Implementation of the New START Treaty is going well, and we see no basis for threats to withdraw from it.

“We continue to believe that cooperation with Russia on missile defense can enhance the security of the United States, our allies in Europe and Russia, and we will continue to work with Russia to define the parameters of possible cooperation. However, in pursuing this cooperation, we will not in any way limit or change our deployment plans in Europe.”

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Wednesday that the “suggestion that deployment of missiles in the areas neighboring the alliance is an appropriate response to NATO’s system is very disappointing.”

“Such deployments would be reminiscent of the past and are inconsistent with the strategic relations NATO and Russia have agreed they seek and with the spirit of the dialogue, including on missile defense issues, that they are currently conducting,” he said in a statement released by NATO.

Still, Rasmussen welcomed Medvedev's “willingness not to close the door on continued dialogue with NATO and the U.S. on missile defense and to consider practical cooperation in this area.”

Tauscher said last month that as a partner in the system, Russia would “continue to be able to confirm that the system is directed against launches originating outside Europe and not from Russia.” She also said that the system will have “no capability to counter Russian strategic forces, given their location, numbers and advanced technology.”

She said the United States is willing to give Russia a guarantee in writing but not make it a legal matter. “We cannot provide legally binding commitments, nor can we agree to limitations on missile defenses, which must necessarily keep pace with the evolution of the threat. But through cooperation we can demonstrate the inherent characteristics of the system and its inability to undermine Russian deterrent forces or strategic ability,” she said last month.

Medvedev said Wednesday that Russia is “ready to discuss additional modifications to the system, taking into account our NATO partners’ views” and will “continue the dialogue with the USA and NATO on this issue.”

“There is still time to reach an understanding,” Medvedev said. “Russia has the political will to reach the agreements needed in this area, agreements that would open a new chapter in our relations with the USA and NATO."

Post by: ,
Filed under: Military • NATO • Russia
soundoff (723 Responses)
  1. Tammy

    Europe and Russia need to communicate

    November 23, 2011 at 6:11 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Howdy Doody

    This system is not for the Protection of the American people but for the protection of our "friends" in the middle east! In fact Russia would not have to use anything that that system would target(and by the way it was not as far as I know developed in this nation) Once again our politicians are risking the American people's well being for our "friends" and this will continue for as long as the American people allow foreign lobbies to have this kind of power in our own nation another reason to consider resetting this democracy as it is.....once again a gigantic failure by our politicians....irritating the Russians for our "friends" in the mid east is perhaps the dumbest most irresponsible thing our politicians can do at a time like this!

    November 23, 2011 at 6:12 pm | Report abuse |
  3. Go mother Russia Go!

    Go Mother Russia Go!

    November 23, 2011 at 6:14 pm | Report abuse |
    • Catharsis

      Russia: Address concerns or we'll target missile shield...

      target the missle shield? – to see if it works? what russian geniuses

      November 23, 2011 at 6:22 pm | Report abuse |
    • fellinivita

      Da!! Rodinamat!!!

      November 23, 2011 at 6:25 pm | Report abuse |
  4. TAK

    How about that Medvedev/Putin logic... "If you install a missile shield, we will point missiles at it". Good luck with that approach, dummy.

    November 23, 2011 at 6:16 pm | Report abuse |
    • CoMike

      And how effective have our missile shields been in the past. A 3.7% success rate does not instill confidence. Is that worth risking a war?

      November 23, 2011 at 6:22 pm | Report abuse |
    • Greg

      You confuse ballistic nuclear missiles with short-range usual missiles (Iskanders), which Russians are going to deploy in the region next to German border to make the shield useless. There are no counter-measures against Iskanders. That's the beauty of the anti-missile shield! So much money spent, so happy US weapon contractors, Russians are fine, and poor Americans who paid for all this out of their own pockets!!! God bless America!!!

      November 24, 2011 at 5:04 am | Report abuse |
  5. Jon

    This might be news to Russia, we sell weapons. Also Russia, there's no reason to launch all the nukes, they only have to detonate to kill the world so waste your damn money if it pleases you.

    November 23, 2011 at 6:16 pm | Report abuse |
  6. The Bear

    how's that reset button workin for ya obama?

    it was laughable then, it still is now...

    only the new york times gushed about the reset button...along with all the other left wing media shills for obama....absolutely disgraceful how the media is soooooo in the tank for this liberal naive community organizer.

    November 23, 2011 at 6:16 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Curt

    Yeah really Protect U.S.A and Canada........ Leave Europe/Britain/Israel to help each other.

    November 23, 2011 at 6:17 pm | Report abuse |
    • Curt

      Could theoretically protect Mexico... But that would be like protecting the Mexican drug cartel.

      November 23, 2011 at 6:19 pm | Report abuse |
    • Greg

      Good thinking, Curt! No! No Mexico! There will be no space for it under the anti-missile umbrella!

      November 24, 2011 at 5:10 am | Report abuse |
  8. LS from Canada

    Medvedev is a mouthpiece for Putin. Uh-oh ..........

    November 23, 2011 at 6:17 pm | Report abuse |
  9. Catharsis

    move them nice and close – easier to take out

    russian's are very uncultured

    and what little culture they have they stole

    November 23, 2011 at 6:19 pm | Report abuse |
    • CoMike

      Thank you for clearing demonstrating your complete lack of knowledge. Try looking up the word "culture" one of these days so you know what it really means.

      November 23, 2011 at 6:24 pm | Report abuse |
    • Catharsis

      russians make uncultured folks look like royalty

      November 23, 2011 at 6:27 pm | Report abuse |
    • Greg

      Yeah, Russians stole his 'little culture' from Americans!!!! LOL

      November 24, 2011 at 5:14 am | Report abuse |
  10. Starscream

    In Soviet Russia, you shoot DOWN defense systems!

    November 23, 2011 at 6:20 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Hu

    If Russia, NATO and the U.S. each pay for the system equilly in currency, Russia steps up to plate and legally (binding contract) promise to protect Europe from all harm then, let Russia man the system. Everyone pays a price and the U.S. does not become a babysitter.

    November 23, 2011 at 6:22 pm | Report abuse |
    • Greg

      That was, as far as I know, the Russian's suggestion.

      November 24, 2011 at 5:16 am | Report abuse |
  12. Curt

    Where does this leave the aliens watching over humanity like a zoo?

    November 23, 2011 at 6:23 pm | Report abuse |
    • Greg

      Curt, are you afraid of what aliens will think of us? Is this your biggest concern? LOL

      November 24, 2011 at 5:18 am | Report abuse |
  13. LS from Canada

    38*52'45.50"
    77*01'34.55"
    SilverHill RECO 055
    UTC 22:00:00 11-24-11
    W309PX0010076
    verify – Foxtrot Golf Golf Romeo 055

    have a nice day

    November 23, 2011 at 6:23 pm | Report abuse |
    • Curt

      What does this refer too?

      November 23, 2011 at 6:27 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Quincey9

    Time for tele-tubbies to grow up. Time to grow up.

    November 23, 2011 at 6:23 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Catharsis

    Russia: Address concerns or we'll target missile shield

    that's right... target a missle shield with missles – russian brainos

    November 23, 2011 at 6:24 pm | Report abuse |
    • Greg

      You confuse ballistic nuclear missiles, which the shield is protecting against with short-range usual missiles (Iskanders), which Russians are going to deploy in the region next to German border to make the shield useless. There are no counter-measures against Iskanders. That's the beauty of the anti-missile shield! So much money spent, so happy US weapon contractors, Russians are fine, and poor Americans who paid for all this out of their own pockets!!! God bless America!!!

      November 24, 2011 at 5:27 am | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26