Scientists: New amphibian family augurs more India discoveries
An adult Chikilidae, a new family of legless amphibian known as a caecilian, is shown with eggs and hatchlings in India.
February 23rd, 2012
07:27 PM ET

Scientists: New amphibian family augurs more India discoveries

Scientists have found what they say is a new family of legless amphibians in Northeast India - animals they say may have diverged from similar vertebrates in Africa when the land masses separated tens of millions of years ago.

The find, the scientists say, might foreshadow other discoveries in Northeast India and might help show the area played a more important evolutionary role than previously thought.

The creatures are part of an order of limbless, soil-dwelling amphibians called caecilians - not to be confused with snakes, which are reptiles. Caecilians were previously known to consist of nine families in Asia, Africa and South America.

But different bone structures in the head distinguish this apparent 10th family, and DNA testing links the creatures not to other caecilians in India, but to caecilians that are exclusively from Africa, the scientists report this week in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

The new family has been dubbed Chikilidae by the scientists from India, Belgium and the United Kingdom, including lead author Rachunliu Kamei, who was pursuing her doctorate at University of Delhi. The team found them during what it believes is the first caecilian survey in Northeast India, digging at 238 sites from 2006 to 2010.

“It’s an amazing thing to find a new family, especially vertebrates, in this day in age,” Global Wildlife Conservation president Don Church, who was not part of the team but knows Kamei and the team’s other scientists, told CNN on Thursday. “Birds, reptiles and amphibians really were thought to have been well worked out at the family level.”

The burrowing amphibians “exhibit an intriguing and highly specialized reproductive behavior,” the team’s leader, University of Delhi professor Sathyabhama Das Biju, told The Times of India.

“The mother builds underground nests for her eggs, guards her egg-clutch by coiling around them until the embryos hatch after 2-3 months,” he told The Times of India. “The eggs undergo direct development - they feed on the yolk reserves and come out as miniature adults.”

Residents of the area had mistaken the amphibians for snakes, the Indian news outlet reported.

Chikilidae’s link to the African caecilians, and its divergence and survival in Northeast India during the subcontinent’s isolation before it joined with Asia, suggests the area had long-term ecological stability. That suggests it might have more life endemic to that region than is currently recognized, the scientists say in the report.

Scientists traditionally have viewed Northeast India as just a passageway where flora and fauna moved between biodiversity hotspots in Southeast Asia and a different part of India, Church said.

“Now, with a study like this, we realize that this part of the world is important not just for the movement of plants and animals between the Indian subcontinent and southeast Asia, but an important area for evolution in its own right,” Church said.

“This discovery begs the question: What else has happened up there in terms of evolution of life in Northeast India?” he added.

Geographically distinct Northeast India has not been studied well, and many other undocumented creatures and flora may await there, according to the team. The region is almost cut off from the rest of India, nearly surrounded by Bangladesh, Myanmar and China.

Time, they say, is of the essence.

“Further explorations and conservation actions are urgent because the region’s biodiversity is generally under high threat from the growing resident human population and rapid deforestation,” the scientists say in their report.

Post by:
Filed under: Amphibians • Animals • India • Nature • Science
soundoff (516 Responses)
  1. Mike

    Reasons why this species is so rare is people often mistake these creatures for poisonous snakes and kill them on the spot while in fact they are non-poisonous.

    February 24, 2012 at 7:40 am | Report abuse |
    • Politico

      In fact, they are non-poisonous non-snakes, but thanks for the eye-opening information.

      February 24, 2012 at 8:33 am | Report abuse |
  2. rojac

    Please, no filler cliches like "Time, they say, is of the essence."

    February 24, 2012 at 7:42 am | Report abuse |
    • Dr. Peabody M. Clamjuice, Ph. D

      "Brevity is the soul of wit."

      February 24, 2012 at 10:27 am | Report abuse |
  3. pismire

    New family, you'd think CNN would at least DESCRIBE it better. Size, length, habits, whether or not they bite, poisonous, edible, make good pets, what they feel like, how fast they move, how they move, where they could be found, etc. But that would be REAL journalism. Instead its important to just say how important of a find it was, and then preach about deforestation.

    February 24, 2012 at 7:52 am | Report abuse |
    • Aezel

      Oh noes! Feigned outrage!

      If you ACTUALLY cared that much about accurate science reporting you would subscribe to an actual scientific journal for your source on new discoveries instead of popular media. I would be willing to bet however, that you don't.

      February 24, 2012 at 8:04 am | Report abuse |
    • Dr. Peabody M. Clamjuice, Ph. D

      I'd say you were being a pis_ant, but your name says it already.

      February 24, 2012 at 8:24 am | Report abuse |
  4. duh123

    Well... I must say... this is an important find. Yawn...

    February 24, 2012 at 7:55 am | Report abuse |
    • Aezel

      Just because you are too uneducated about biology to know how important it is doesn't mean everyone is that dumb.

      February 24, 2012 at 8:02 am | Report abuse |
    • Politico

      Yeah, the impact on your life is going to be huge, tremendous, unfathomable, you dummy.

      February 24, 2012 at 8:36 am | Report abuse |
  5. Ted

    They look like worms to me.

    February 24, 2012 at 7:56 am | Report abuse |
    • Lynn

      Totally agree

      February 24, 2012 at 8:09 am | Report abuse |
  6. Samwise

    Thanks to letting me know about this important discovery; too bad it seems to be over the heads of the mouth-breathers.

    February 24, 2012 at 8:04 am | Report abuse |
  7. Annoyed

    Duh they are called worms.. Hellllo!!!!

    February 24, 2012 at 8:05 am | Report abuse |
    • Politico

      Worms have bones? Since when?

      February 24, 2012 at 8:27 am | Report abuse |
  8. Dr. Peabody M. Clamjuice, Ph. D

    We believe it may also be closely related to newts and gingrichs.

    February 24, 2012 at 8:06 am | Report abuse |
    • Mainah

      Thank you for my morning laugh outloud!

      February 24, 2012 at 8:15 am | Report abuse |
    • rachbell

      Good one!

      February 24, 2012 at 8:19 am | Report abuse |
    • Sal Amander

      On behalf of my family and the whole amphibian class, I resent that!

      February 24, 2012 at 9:10 am | Report abuse |
    • Dr. Peabody M. Clamjuice, Ph. D

      Sal, everyone knows newts and efts are from a much lower class than salamanders.

      February 24, 2012 at 10:28 am | Report abuse |
  9. devon

    OK, who's going to break it to them? They're earth worms.

    February 24, 2012 at 8:07 am | Report abuse |
    • musomesa

      Earthworms don't have bones.

      February 24, 2012 at 8:25 am | Report abuse |
  10. Jim Bob

    If you're too stupid to understand science, please post your ignorant drivel somewhere else.

    February 24, 2012 at 8:07 am | Report abuse |
  11. DrawYourOwnConclusions

    Most doctoral students (and they are students) need to make up some kinda of grand theory to justify the amount of time they have wasted thinking about stuff like this which is not important.

    Put that thing on a hook and it will attract fish just like a worm.

    February 24, 2012 at 8:08 am | Report abuse |
    • Dr. Peabody M. Clamjuice, Ph. D

      "Put that thing on a hook and it will attract fish just like a worm" That's what SHE said.

      February 24, 2012 at 8:18 am | Report abuse |
  12. worman

    Tank u for calling technical support, I HAVE WORMS

    February 24, 2012 at 8:20 am | Report abuse |
    • Dr. Peabody M. Clamjuice, Ph. D

      Do you have crickets and minnows too?

      February 24, 2012 at 8:25 am | Report abuse |
    • Jim Bob

      You need to see a doctor.

      February 24, 2012 at 8:29 am | Report abuse |
  13. erich2112x

    Let's see what they taste like.

    February 24, 2012 at 8:28 am | Report abuse |
    • Dr. Peabody M. Clamjuice, Ph. D

      You go first. If you don't turn blue, maybe the rest of us will -you know what? Just help yourself. The rest of us aren't hungry.

      February 24, 2012 at 8:31 am | Report abuse |
  14. weezer

    Bobby Jindal - another odd amphibian from India.

    February 24, 2012 at 8:31 am | Report abuse |
  15. Politico

    I like when the media makes up news for sensationalism.

    "The find, the scientists say, might foreshadow other discoveries in Northeast India and might help show the area played a more important evolutionary role than previously thought."

    In other words, this is the first find, but IF they find MORE, then it COULD show some importance.

    February 24, 2012 at 8:32 am | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14