- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 63,731,178
Death of actress Anne Heche is ruled an accident by the Los Angeles County coroner. cnn.it/3dCgnlQ
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 63,731,178
Federal judge rules that Walmart, CVS and Walgreens must pay $650.6 million to two Ohio counties for damages relateâ€twitter.com/i/web/status/1…vF
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 63,731,178
Casualties reported after an explosion at a Kabul mosque during evening prayers, police official says cnn.it/3A6GWqL
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 63,731,178
CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky announces sweeping reorganization plans aimed at changing the agency's culture tâ€twitter.com/i/web/status/1…cL
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 63,731,178
Inflation in the United Kingdom hit a new 40-year high last month, rising above 10% and piling further pain on housâ€twitter.com/i/web/status/1…La
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 63,731,178
President Biden signs a sweeping $750 billion health care, tax and climate bill into law, securing a key piece of hâ€twitter.com/i/web/status/1…8p
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 63,731,178
TJ Cox, a former Democratic congressman from California, is indicted on money laundering and wire fraud charges cnn.it/3CbJgj4
CNN POLITICS ON FACEBOOK » | CNN POLITICS ON TWITTER »
For $2,500, Brooklyn artist invites 1% to take home complaints of the 99%
Sebastian Errazuriz is at it again, making political statements with his art. This time, the target is the 1% - of which he may be a member when the art exhibit is through.
The Chilean-born artist used placards from the Occupy Wall Street movement as his muse and painted some of the movement's slogans onto wooden fold-out chairs. The acrylic paint messages include, "Hungry? Eat a Banker," "Kill Corporate Greed" and "Too Big to Fail is Too Big to Allow."
"The artist wishes to support the 99% by inviting collectors (representing the 1%) to purchase the complaints as art or furniture, thus introducing the ideas of one group into the homes of another and at the same time getting the rich to support the cause of the 99%," a news release states.
There are eight Occupy Chairs, and 10 of each design. The eight designs are on display at the Cristina Grajales Gallery booth at the Armory Show, an annual modern art fair in Manhattan that began Thursday and runs through the weekend.
Though Errazuriz, 34, doesn't shy away from bold statements - such as, say, planting 1,100 crosses under the Brooklyn Bridge to highlight the number of deaths in New York each week - his latest endeavor made him nervous.
"I honestly didn't know if the 1% would buy the Occupy Chairs or feel attacked and insulted," he said. "The other gallery people looked at us like, 'What the hell are (they) doing bringing protest signs to an art fair focused on collectors who are obviously all 1%?' "
He noticed, however, that the union workers setting up the booths had a markedly different take. They were calling their buddies over, "grinning happily, fishing out their phones and taking snapshots of the chairs," Errazuriz said.
Though many of Errazuriz's projects focus on the "dichotomies of life and death," he has made his share of political statements. In 2006, he planted a magnolia tree at midfield of Chile's National Stadium where dictator Augusto Pinochet tortured and killed political prisoners in 1973. A year earlier, he made a coat out of teddy bears as a statement on the comeback of fur on fashion runways.
The Occupy Chairs were inspired by placards from the Occupy Wall Street movement, the artist says.
He’s also created furniture and sculptures and designed clothing, including sexy dresses made of latex gloves or zippers.
Last time we checked in on Errazuriz in 2010, he was highlighting the U.S. military suicide rate by turning the cinder-block wall outside his Brooklyn studio into an art fixture. The public art display demonstrated how many troops had been killed in combat versus how many took their own lives.
Of his latest project, Errazuriz said he was surprised by the popularity of the Occupy Chairs. On the first day of the Armory Show, he sold a dozen of them. The price tag? A hefty $2,500 apiece.
"I was hoping to be able to tempt a few collectors to take the complaint signs home. I never expected them to become a great sale," he said.
The news release about his exhibit says that Errazuriz is donating a portion of the proceeds to the Occupy movement, but he won't disclose if he will donate 99% or succumb to his own greed and give 1%.
Pressed on the question Friday, Errazuriz told CNN that it was more a matter of soul searching than a marketing gimmick.
"Leaving the percentage of the donation a mystery was to question my own motives and gauge my own temptation, depending on the amount sold," he said.
He concedes that his decision got a lot tougher after sales surpassed his expectations - to the tune of $30,000 in one day.
"I figured if I sold one or two, donating most of the money seemed easy. Now that the amounts are higher, the temptation naturally gets a lot stronger, and I start getting a glimpse of what the 1% probably feels."
On Twitter
On Twitter
@cnnbrk on Twitter
I still do not understand why I make alot of money and work my butt off, that I am some bad guy to these people. I work hard to make this money, it is not given to me, I do not have greed. This is for my family. This needs to stop, you can't go on job interviews hanging out on Wall street!
http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-things-rich-people-need-to-stop-saying_p2/
Your hard work is commendable, but I bet you a buffalo nickel that there are people that work a hell of a lot harder than you and don't make enough to feed their family. As reported last week, the income for those who make over $500,000 rose over 17% last year. The income for the middle class rose just over 1%. That doesn't even cover the cost of inflation. I work hard for what I have too, but it doesn't put me in a position to ignore the facts. I don't think people realize how dangerous this trend is for our economy.
most if not all of the occupy protesters were employed
You have to make over $380k per year to be in the richest 1%. Is your family really going to be in that bad a shape if you have to pay more than 15% in taxes? Do you think people making less than 1/10 of your salary should bare the costs of bailing out your too-big-too-fail company next time it destroys the economy?
I don't think you're a bad guy. I just think that you should pay at least the same tax rate as a struggling blue-collar family.
I also think that your line of work is bad if it involves hostile takeovers of profitable companies to sell the assets and close the businesses, or if you engage in deceptive practices against uninformed consumers (like hawking payday loans and obscuring the fees in long fine print).
If you don't do any of those things, and if you agree that you should contribute your fair share to the nation that protects your ability to profit for yourself and protects the welfare of the consumers of your products, then I commend you on your hard work.
I have been POOR, my parents were poor, lived in shanny town WWII & after, they worked hard, gave us kids what theycould and build up to a middleclass, taught their 3 kids to work hard, 2 did & one became a Liberal looser, my sister and I work very hard & Saved and invested to live in top 30% & the OWS and rest of lazy poor can kiss by BOOT – it is my money NOT THEIRs or lazy poor on Uncle Sams Plantation or any DUMB Liberal wanting to take it
SNAZZY- I dont CARE as long as they are NOT taking from me to give to the POOR
Freedom is NOT Equality- there is NO SUCH Thing as equality – survial of the fittest
My company is small, I don't take a salary, I work off commissions. There are no hostile takeovers and I pay more than you think in taxes. Try about 33% in Philadelphia. Your facts are wrong. 15% is what I get taxed on after I already paid taxes on it at the 33% and then invest it and take it out for another investment and then I get taxed again for 15%. It is called capital gains. I am not sure you understand how this all works. Yes, is the system broke, I think so. I get taxed like everyone else. I am not the bad guy.
I hear people complain they don't make enough money for the work they do all the time. My reply is always the same, what are you doing about it. 99% of the time I either get silence or more complaining, very rarely does someone actually say something they are doing to improve their situation. There's the problem in a nutshell many, many people today think its someone elses job to improve their situation, not theirs. When I was in the Navy I had Sailors come up to me all the time and say, "I wish I made what you Officers make" or "I wish I ate on plates instead of trays" My response is basically the same, if you want the pay and perks become an Officer. Their reply is always the same, "I don't want that level of responsibility" or something like "Thats a lot of hard work". Bingo, again the problem and solution in a nutshell. For those who still do not get it, quit whinning and start doing. If it does not work try again and if you keep failling take a long hard look at what you are doing, you are doing it wrong.
hate to break it to you mars, but you probably don't make enough to be 1%-er
I am not going to discuss how much I make, but I do not have to work anymore if I did not want to but I do because I am not lazy. I am 37 as well. Is that enough for you!
The 15% tax rate refers to the carried interest loophole which allows the salaries of private equity and hedge fund employees to be taxed at the long term capital gains rate. The "Wall Street" in occupy wall street refers to how people in the financial industry use loop-holes to avoid paying taxes. If you are paying 33%, then you probably do not work in that industry.
Top 1% pay 40% of federal income taxes
Top 10% pay 75% of federal income taxes
Bottom 47% pay 0% of federal income taxes
80% of people who do pay taxes have an “effective” tax rate below 15%
Top 7% pay 68% of all money donated to charities
The idea that the rich are not paying their “fair share” is ridiculous, it is a thinly veiled attempt to elicit an emotional response by blaming someone else, the "rich" (this time).
The problem is that the federal income tax hardly pays for anything. The federal income taxes are only 6% of GDP but government spending is 24% of GDP. The government gets most of its money from payroll taxes and borrowing.
Guys – you are grossly mistaken with the tax rate. Those people who make 315K get taxed at 35% or higher, the 15% capital gains tax is a tax that is on money made from investments which that person already was taxed 35% on. So in summary capital gains is a tax on revenue made by money you invested after the income tax.
Now apply that to a person like candidate Romney, Romney doesn't have a job, however if continues to make money off of investment his trust makes on his behalf. If he were to buy P&G stock, that pays a divined of about a $.50 quarterly for each individual stock you own. So if you own 100 shares then you get 50 dollars. So if Romney were to buy 100,000 shares, using money he made and was taxed 35% on, then he would $50,000 quarterly and annually $200,000. That $200,000 is then subject to capital gains taxes because it was a return on a investment that he made on money he was already taxed on.
This country need a lesson in finance and so does our president. Especially when he makes blanket statements about how much money makes you rich, because living in Manhattan KS and Manhattan NY are two very different costs of livings.
DUh – look up "carried interest" on google or wikipedia. Mitt Romney pays 15% on all his income from his regular job at Bain. He continues to pay 15% on his pension. This is the tax rate for people who work in private equity and hedge funds.
You aren't the 1%. Quit kidding yourself. Nobody cares about who you are or what you do.
This guys is laughing all the way to the bank, like most Democrats who malign the rich while getting rich themselves. That's why the 99% are where they are you bunch of sheep.
This is to art what dubstep is to music.
The only reason this art sells is the creator is probably one of the most talented bullsh!t artists around. Spew a pile of lies about how if you read between the lines, and look at all the symbolism, and the hidden metaphorical subtext and people will part with their money thinking that the piece is more then just laziness.
It's over your head too
Its so over your head. You just dont get it, its so deep! The meaning and the subtly and the hyperbole (if you havent noticed that the new 99 cent word in comment sections). You just dont get it and yes and my farts dont stink either! They smell like sunshine dust!
@KKDenver, I am sooooo glad you are such an expert on art that you skillfully explained it all in such a way that everyone can understand and enjoy the piece as you can. You must be a museum curator with your in depth knowledge and understanding of art. I take my hat off to your wisdom since in your opinion I could not begin to understand the complexities of attempting to make a profit out of protesting. Thank you for opening my eyes.
Brought to you by the People for Hyperbole and Sarcasm
not over my head....just dumb
it's clever and provocative, sorry it's not the "Married with children" type of product you feel you can digest.
Mistaking your opinion for fact is....well.....also dumb.
Mistaking someone elses option as a statement of fact is....well....also dumb.
Bob, it was stated as a fact. It's a verbiage thing. Work on the reading comprehension.
Actaully when talking about art in this manner it is all optinion. Not a reading comprehension thing at all.
You sure can tell which of these posters is a republican. They have absolutely no understanding of why something is considered art.
Attack faster, you have not flooded the comments with enough of your wisdom!
You are a complete moron to put that Republicans do not know art hen they see it. I get it dude! My art collection is pretty intense. I am not sure you know what art really is.
Sorry... they don't
I am a Republican. I know art. I own art. I create art. What does a political party have to do with being educated in art?
Art is something so moving every person can see it, Trash that is called art and can only be seen as art by a select few is still trash. The Mona Lisa is Art these signs are trash, Its the Emperors new clothes all over again.
KK, by you throwing out that comment shows that perhaps you yourself are confused but the notion of "Art" as anyone should know that Art is 100% completely subjective. It is up to every indivdual to decide what is art. Ask yourself, if you were in a park, and stepped over the "art" mention in this article, would you think, "Hey, I just stepped over art," or would you think, "Hey, I just stepped over a sign?" Art is also contextual.
Those decrying this are the same who don't understand Pollack or Christo.
Do tell!
Not true...well, not true for all. I studied Art History for years and make a living as an Artist. I've done conceptual Master studies. And I love Pollack and I love the notion of painting of the sake of painting. I understand the concepts with great pain and stake my reputation on creating intriguing concepts. However, this stuff is lazy both visually and conceptually. Sebastian is not always this lazy but his stuff this time around reeks of being situationally capitalisitc. I'm all about not be a starving artist, but call an onion, an onion, and not an apple.
wrong.....Democrat who lives in Austin....obviously i'm over your head. Snow must be getting to ya
it is actually
It amazes me to see how many working class people malign the occupy movement. They should be the ones most behind it. Then again, if you enjoy getting screwed over but want the chance to be the one who does the screwing eventually then I see where you might like it. Wall Street essentially caused the economic collapse and changed the laws to suit their own needs. They made millions while most struggle to make rent, and most of them did no jail time.
Working class people for the most part are conservative, The OWS is a Liberal movement funded by the Democratic party and Our present administration is 100 percent behind it, The OWS was disappointing that the average man didnt get behind there movement in the fall, And they will be equally disappointed in the Spring when the democratic party fires this group up again, But when A movement like the OWS fails to get followers and fails to gain momentum it will turn violent, Then you will truly see who is behind this movement, By that I mean How the Govt responds to this movements violence?
If you're poor you deserve it, if you're rich you deserve it. Plain and simple.
I take it you also consider the "home economics" portion of your GED to qualify you as an economics expert.
Look, I can make up mindless and non-factual drivel too: "If you're handicapped, you deserve it. If you're not, you deserve it. Plain and simple."
My false statement there is equally as valid as yours. Sure, some people, like conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer, may be handicapped due to their own mistakes (Google him), but many if not most have done nothing to deserve their predicaments and work hard to overcome them.
Most poor people in this country are fully employed or have been laid off in the recession. They often work far harder than the rich, who, by the way, most commonly earn their money through inheritance. Now, I know many wealthy (and several undeniably rich) people who made their money through hard work and ingenuity, and I fully support that and hope to do the same. But that doesn't mean those who haven't reached the American dream deserve to fail. And it doesn't mean that those who have won extraordinary riches deserve a capital-gains tax break.
To clarify, I think the vast majority of handicapped individuals had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with their physical situations (I believe most are merely genetic), and I'm not certain there's anyone in the world who "deserves" to be handicapped, including Charles Krauthammer.
I can't let the cheap level of discourse in the comments sections make me equally hateful.
A most unoriginal charlatan mocking a good cause; take it from a real artist. I grew up witnessing art schools churn out hundreds of issue/installation "artists" just like him since at least the '80's. He would be nothing if not for someone in the N.Y. art mafia propping him up. His website is loaded with contrivances of famous controversial non-art from the past.
Occupy protestors are morons that can't do math.
I am an artist in the "99%", and this people, is what I consider lazy art both visually and conceptually and situationally pathetic. However, I thought his Occupy Chairs was clever but not the he intended it. I see it as people who sit around all day, need chairs; although him charging $2500 nulifies that notion. Because of the 1% who pretend to be 99%, I'm sure he enjoys the capitalization of his $2500 per chair. Functional Art sure can be a good thing.
i agree with everyone here
I agree 100% with nothing you've stated.
I really love "I'm so angry, I made a sign". I am going to make a piece of art somehow with that quote as the centerpiece (I think the artist could have done better with a great idea).
I hate the idea of the 99%...nobody said all these clowns could speak for 99% of the population. I'm not in the 1%, but certainly the 5%, and I'm not like you people. I am the 95th percentile...nothing more, nothing less.
this is offensive
Since when did 99% of the population become bleeding heart, anti-capitalism, anarchical, lazy liberals?
@brian2432 Since when did FOX News lovers come to CNN for there news?
I am not a billionair... but I sure dont want to be a part of this 99% crowd. A bunch of whiners. They are not interested in the betterment of society. If they were they wold be less vocal and more succesful. The game is not rigged against anyone, but rather, hard work is rewarded by success. Life is not fair and nobodies success will look the same. At the end of my life I refuse to look back and say I didnt get what I wanted because those people had too much. I want to do ALL I CAN to better myself. What others do is up to them. Now stop whining about it. Grow up people!
To brian2432: We the 99% became socialist left wing rebels about the same time the top 1% became neo-fascist oligarchy aristocratic exploiters and nazis.
@ leftyavenger: gotta love all the 10 dollar words being thrown around by the college kids that don't actually mean anything. hey, buddy: Nazi was the name for the German National Socialist Party. And mindsets like those of occupy was how they took over and murdered 6 million jewish people.
See, i can invoke godwin's law, too. The 1% as you call them are not fascists, otherwise you wouldn't be allowed to vote. Stop voting for ineffectual politicians, and bring in someone else. And, perhaps most important, do this at every level of government, from your city council to the president of the united states. If you're really the 99%, you should have no trouble voting in the best of the best, and by a landslide, too.
@brian2432: When did it become a crime to be rich?