May 14th, 2012
02:14 PM ET

From first black president to 'first gay president'?

As if becoming the first black president wasn't momentous enough, Barack Obama has just been handed a new title: "First gay president."

A Newsweek magazine cover bestowed that distinction on Obama this week with a picture of the president and a rainbow halo. If you view that as a naked attempt to grab your attention, capitalize on the moment and have you pick up a newsmagazine, you might be right.

But that illustration - along with a New Yorker cover showing the columns of the White House lit up in rainbow colors - certainly shows how the president’s public support of same-sex marriage has pushed the issue back into the spotlight.

The magazines’ choices also speak to the broad cultural impact of Obama's announcement and pose questions about whether this moment may become a lasting part of his legacy.

That's not to say the president's announcement is necessarily a watershed moment. It earned him kudos and criticism despite the fact that he left the legal standing of same-sex marriage in the hands of the states and made no policy changes.

The issue also is far from resolved in the African-American community, and some conservatives say Obama's announcement comes at a political cost.'s John Blake writes that some suggest the black church may punish Obama for announcing his support for same-sex marriage.

As millions went to church this weekend after the president's announcement, clergy across the country offered their opinions, with the words of black pastors - a key base of support for Obama in 2008 - carrying special weight in a presidential election year. But black pastors were hardly monolithic in addressing Obama's remarks.

Blake points out that a backlash by some African-American pastors, a campaign worry following the announcement, can be seen as historical irony. Black church leaders arguing against same-sex marriage are making some of the same arguments that supporters of slavery made in the 18th and 19th centuries, some historians say. Both groups adopted a literal reading of the Bible to justify withholding basic rights from a particular group.

Patrick R. Tull, a Lumberton, New Jersey, iReporter and Obama supporter, said that he believes marriage is between a man and a woman and that the president has alienated a big section of his supporters in the black community who have not "evolved" as the president has.

"The fact is many Americans, which includes Democrats, have not 'evolved' on the issue of same-sex marriage," Tull said. "Mr. President, you should have stood your ground and said, that you believe marriage is between a man and a woman, but you are against discrimination of any kind. Individual states should decide what's best for their state. It is a free country and people are free to love whomever they want and that's OK with me, but I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman."

Vera Richardson, also an Obama supporter, said the president’s stance on same-sex marriage will be his undoing for re-election.

“I am confused, I cannot vote for (Mitt) Romney, and I know Obama needs our vote, but he has caused anxiety in the black community," she said in an iReport.

But for Andrew Sullivan, the writer of the Newsweek article and also a gay man, Obama's announcement meant everything for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.

"For gay Americans and their families, the emotional darkness of Tuesday night became a canvas on which Obama could paint a widening dawn," Sullivan writes. "But I didn’t expect it. Like many others, I braced myself for disappointment. And yet when I watched the interview, the tears came flooding down. ...

"I was utterly unprepared for how psychologically transformative the moment would be. To have the president of the United States affirm my humanity - and the humanity of all gay Americans - was, unexpectedly, a watershed. He shifted the mainstream in one interview. And last week, a range of Democratic leaders - from Harry Reid to Steny Hoyer - backed the president, who moved an entire party behind a position that only a few years ago was regarded as simply preposterous."

And for one Republican, the announcement swayed him toward supporting Obama.

“I'm very happy with Obama's decision because at the end of the business day I can see my partner and feel hopeful,” said iReporter David A. Seaman of Lansford, Pennsylvania. “I never would have thought he would do something like this. Just this decision alone made me swing way left to vote.”

While that analysis may be true for some, others wondered if the Newsweek cover went too far in enshrining the moment and its significance.

It's not entirely unprecedented to bestow such a title to a sitting president. In the '90s, Bill Clinton was dubbed America's first black president.

"African-American men seemed to understand it right away," Toni Morrison wrote in The New Yorker in 1998 about the Monica Lewinsky scandal that rocked Washington. "Years ago, in the middle of the Whitewater investigation, one heard the first murmurs: white skin notwithstanding, this is our first black President. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children’s lifetime. After all, Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald’s-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas."

And in many ways, the shared connections or perceived ones that earned Clinton that title, mockingly or not, is part of why Sullivan has bestowed "First Gay President" upon Obama.

Sullivan writes that a black president who likely had to go through a period of self-discovery growing up as well as struggle for equality shared in some way the plight of gay Americans. As Obama eventually shattered the barrier of office to the "White" House, his announcement will allow gay Americans to shatter the stereotypes placed on them, Sullivan argues.

“Barack Obama had to come out of a different closet. He had to discover his black identity and then reconcile it with his white family, just as gays discover their homosexual identity and then have to reconcile it with their heterosexual family," he writes. "The America he grew up in had no space for a boy like him: black yet enveloped by loving whiteness, estranged from a father he longed for (another common gay experience), hurtling between being a Barry and a Barack, needing an American racial identity as he grew older but chafing also against it and over-embracing it at times.”

This week's column in The New Yorker, headlined "Wedding Bells," argues that Obama's announcement is on par with the importance of abolishing laws against interracial marriage in the 1960s.

Writer Margaret Talbot points to the Supreme Court's 1967 decision in Loving v. Virginia that struck down anti-miscegenation laws, saying the acceptance of same-sex marriage is inevitable.

"One day, not long from now, it will be hard to remember what worried people so much about gay and lesbian couples committing themselves to marriage," Talbot writes in the New Yorker.

"And, eventually, the Court will do the right thing on same-sex marriage, just as the President did last week. As in the Loving decision, the Court will reaffirm that the 'freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.' And it will finally uphold that freedom for gay and lesbian Americans."

soundoff (1,368 Responses)
  1. kev

    does he know

    May 14, 2012 at 3:54 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Mr.Man

    Who should really care. Our time on earth is to be civil to each other and be tolerant. It'll be God's decision at the gates to judge people.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:56 pm | Report abuse |
  3. seebs

    And yes, the popular vote has often been against allowing gay marriage. But then, the laws against interracial marriage had strong popular support, too. Part of why we have the fancy government we do is to protect the rights of minorities, whether or not other people consider them "normal".

    May 14, 2012 at 3:56 pm | Report abuse |
    • me138

      Exactly why we are not and should never be a Democracy.

      May 14, 2012 at 3:58 pm | Report abuse |
    • charles e johnson

      I believe it's about 30 million voters in this country that are either Gay or very soft(if you know what I mean). So president Obama made a very smart political move. Please respond.

      May 14, 2012 at 4:08 pm | Report abuse |
    • butch

      gays are not minorities

      May 14, 2012 at 4:08 pm | Report abuse |
    • butch

      10% of the population is not gay. it's more like 4% and those people already vote democrat. this is all just smoke and mirrors to take the focus off of the economy.

      May 14, 2012 at 4:10 pm | Report abuse |
  4. tdavyd

    Well said, well said... To many Political Pastor's & not enough Spiritual Pastor's showing God's love for all... God has Unconditional Love not Selective Love like these Fake pastor's!

    May 14, 2012 at 3:59 pm | Report abuse |
  5. Carl, Secaucus, NJ

    If you let gays serve their nation in the military, you'd look pretty bad to say "you can die for your country, but you can't get married there."

    May 14, 2012 at 3:59 pm | Report abuse |
  6. john L

    Where in the Hell is this so called Pres. taking this Great country. has to be the worst in all history!!

    May 14, 2012 at 4:01 pm | Report abuse |
    • Roga

      If by worst you mean best.....

      May 14, 2012 at 4:12 pm | Report abuse |
    • FLIndpendent

      Into the 21st Century – we're already 12 years behind! BTW, I'm in my 50's, white & not gay!

      May 14, 2012 at 4:15 pm | Report abuse |
    • mike f


      May 14, 2012 at 4:23 pm | Report abuse |
  7. j0eschm0e

    wow that didnt make any sense at all

    May 14, 2012 at 4:02 pm | Report abuse |
  8. blueyeddevil

    he's only half gay

    May 14, 2012 at 4:02 pm | Report abuse |
  9. pitt04

    The media is doing whatever they can to break him down and he knows it and he doesn't care.
    He just keeps on doing his job.........

    May 14, 2012 at 4:03 pm | Report abuse |
  10. No one

    Happy gay?

    May 14, 2012 at 4:03 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Really?

    just canceled my subscription to Newsweek, that was too much false advertising for me. when Newsweek goes the way of the inquirer then it deserves to be place next to the glam mags in the checkout.

    May 14, 2012 at 4:03 pm | Report abuse |
  12. Dave Scoven

    What part of "liberty and justice for all" do we disagree with? "Liberty" doesn't mean "the freedom to discriminate against people who aren't hurting you and are doing things that are none of your business."

    "Here's the thing about rights. They're not supposed to be voted on. That's why they're called 'rights'." – Rachel Maddow.

    May 14, 2012 at 4:04 pm | Report abuse |
    • Brenda

      Why do gay people think "rights" means anything that THEY believe in. In a society/democracy, it is a collective sentiment that guides the laws. Just because a vocal minority calls something a 'right' doesn't give them the authority to shove it down the rest of America's throat.....thats why we don't allow polygamy, beastiality, etc.... Some people think it is "just fine" to do those things, and they don't really hurt others....but we AS A SOCIETY have decided we are not going to make them legal and "ok". Gay people (and liberals in general) need to figure that out.

      May 14, 2012 at 4:12 pm | Report abuse |
  13. J Stuart

    The GOP would be smart to keep the spotlight on this issue and away from the JPMorganchase debacle. Then they would need to answer why they do not support regulation to prevent another economic collapse.

    It's odd how a group can so adamantly oppose government regulation in order to prevent another economic collapse, but will gladly support government regulating the personal life of American citizen

    May 14, 2012 at 4:05 pm | Report abuse |
    • Dean

      Funny how people can't remember that Chriss Dodd became in charge of the Senate Banking Committee in 2007 and rewrote all those financial regulations to protect us.

      May 14, 2012 at 4:12 pm | Report abuse |
  14. CC

    u made me sick with that statement, now look at your days ahead and u will regret what you have said... u will be an unhappy and misserably man

    May 14, 2012 at 4:06 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Really?

    and to be correct Newsweek ...The first gay president was James Buchanan more than a century ago! its best to leave the fake news to the big guys like the inquirer!

    May 14, 2012 at 4:06 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52