May 14th, 2012
02:14 PM ET

From first black president to 'first gay president'?

As if becoming the first black president wasn't momentous enough, Barack Obama has just been handed a new title: "First gay president."

A Newsweek magazine cover bestowed that distinction on Obama this week with a picture of the president and a rainbow halo. If you view that as a naked attempt to grab your attention, capitalize on the moment and have you pick up a newsmagazine, you might be right.

But that illustration - along with a New Yorker cover showing the columns of the White House lit up in rainbow colors - certainly shows how the president’s public support of same-sex marriage has pushed the issue back into the spotlight.

The magazines’ choices also speak to the broad cultural impact of Obama's announcement and pose questions about whether this moment may become a lasting part of his legacy.

That's not to say the president's announcement is necessarily a watershed moment. It earned him kudos and criticism despite the fact that he left the legal standing of same-sex marriage in the hands of the states and made no policy changes.

The issue also is far from resolved in the African-American community, and some conservatives say Obama's announcement comes at a political cost.

CNN.com's John Blake writes that some suggest the black church may punish Obama for announcing his support for same-sex marriage.

As millions went to church this weekend after the president's announcement, clergy across the country offered their opinions, with the words of black pastors - a key base of support for Obama in 2008 - carrying special weight in a presidential election year. But black pastors were hardly monolithic in addressing Obama's remarks.

Blake points out that a backlash by some African-American pastors, a campaign worry following the announcement, can be seen as historical irony. Black church leaders arguing against same-sex marriage are making some of the same arguments that supporters of slavery made in the 18th and 19th centuries, some historians say. Both groups adopted a literal reading of the Bible to justify withholding basic rights from a particular group.

Patrick R. Tull, a Lumberton, New Jersey, iReporter and Obama supporter, said that he believes marriage is between a man and a woman and that the president has alienated a big section of his supporters in the black community who have not "evolved" as the president has.

"The fact is many Americans, which includes Democrats, have not 'evolved' on the issue of same-sex marriage," Tull said. "Mr. President, you should have stood your ground and said, that you believe marriage is between a man and a woman, but you are against discrimination of any kind. Individual states should decide what's best for their state. It is a free country and people are free to love whomever they want and that's OK with me, but I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman."

Vera Richardson, also an Obama supporter, said the president’s stance on same-sex marriage will be his undoing for re-election.

“I am confused, I cannot vote for (Mitt) Romney, and I know Obama needs our vote, but he has caused anxiety in the black community," she said in an iReport.

But for Andrew Sullivan, the writer of the Newsweek article and also a gay man, Obama's announcement meant everything for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.

"For gay Americans and their families, the emotional darkness of Tuesday night became a canvas on which Obama could paint a widening dawn," Sullivan writes. "But I didn’t expect it. Like many others, I braced myself for disappointment. And yet when I watched the interview, the tears came flooding down. ...

"I was utterly unprepared for how psychologically transformative the moment would be. To have the president of the United States affirm my humanity - and the humanity of all gay Americans - was, unexpectedly, a watershed. He shifted the mainstream in one interview. And last week, a range of Democratic leaders - from Harry Reid to Steny Hoyer - backed the president, who moved an entire party behind a position that only a few years ago was regarded as simply preposterous."

And for one Republican, the announcement swayed him toward supporting Obama.

“I'm very happy with Obama's decision because at the end of the business day I can see my partner and feel hopeful,” said iReporter David A. Seaman of Lansford, Pennsylvania. “I never would have thought he would do something like this. Just this decision alone made me swing way left to vote.”

While that analysis may be true for some, others wondered if the Newsweek cover went too far in enshrining the moment and its significance.

It's not entirely unprecedented to bestow such a title to a sitting president. In the '90s, Bill Clinton was dubbed America's first black president.

"African-American men seemed to understand it right away," Toni Morrison wrote in The New Yorker in 1998 about the Monica Lewinsky scandal that rocked Washington. "Years ago, in the middle of the Whitewater investigation, one heard the first murmurs: white skin notwithstanding, this is our first black President. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children’s lifetime. After all, Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald’s-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas."

And in many ways, the shared connections or perceived ones that earned Clinton that title, mockingly or not, is part of why Sullivan has bestowed "First Gay President" upon Obama.

Sullivan writes that a black president who likely had to go through a period of self-discovery growing up as well as struggle for equality shared in some way the plight of gay Americans. As Obama eventually shattered the barrier of office to the "White" House, his announcement will allow gay Americans to shatter the stereotypes placed on them, Sullivan argues.

“Barack Obama had to come out of a different closet. He had to discover his black identity and then reconcile it with his white family, just as gays discover their homosexual identity and then have to reconcile it with their heterosexual family," he writes. "The America he grew up in had no space for a boy like him: black yet enveloped by loving whiteness, estranged from a father he longed for (another common gay experience), hurtling between being a Barry and a Barack, needing an American racial identity as he grew older but chafing also against it and over-embracing it at times.”

This week's column in The New Yorker, headlined "Wedding Bells," argues that Obama's announcement is on par with the importance of abolishing laws against interracial marriage in the 1960s.

Writer Margaret Talbot points to the Supreme Court's 1967 decision in Loving v. Virginia that struck down anti-miscegenation laws, saying the acceptance of same-sex marriage is inevitable.

"One day, not long from now, it will be hard to remember what worried people so much about gay and lesbian couples committing themselves to marriage," Talbot writes in the New Yorker.

"And, eventually, the Court will do the right thing on same-sex marriage, just as the President did last week. As in the Loving decision, the Court will reaffirm that the 'freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.' And it will finally uphold that freedom for gay and lesbian Americans."

soundoff (1,368 Responses)
  1. nanna

    Have respect for out President Of the United States. No matter if you agree or disagree with his issues of running this country, at least act human.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:37 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Truthhurts

    Obama presides over a gay congress. the left married to the left, right married to the right and nothing is being produced.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:38 pm | Report abuse |
  3. liehunter

    Interesting how so many of you seem offended by someone minding another person's business. Don't you all want the government to mind everyone's business and solve all of your problems. You can't have it all, especially if you expect someone to just hand it to you.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:38 pm | Report abuse |
  4. pigmore

    always figured he was a fruitcake.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:39 pm | Report abuse |
    • Cheryl

      I strongly agree!!!!!!

      May 14, 2012 at 3:43 pm | Report abuse |
  5. Cheryl

    Don't let the Devil trick you... lie to you... make wrong seem right... Obama is a liar... he's trying to trick you... don't believe the hype!

    May 14, 2012 at 3:39 pm | Report abuse |
    • FLIndpendent

      Cheryl you have a right to your opinion, but remember that's all it is!

      May 14, 2012 at 3:42 pm | Report abuse |
    • DaRealist

      so by obama telling the truth about how he feels on gay marriage is somehow a lie, and trick of the devil??? go back and learn what deciet is...you should be more worried about the ones who dont tell the truth about how they feel, and have no problem lieing to you just to get a vote.

      May 14, 2012 at 3:43 pm | Report abuse |
    • Michael

      Cheryl – your opinion is right on point. He is a liar, and he is very much someone who will do anything to win. Gay and Lesbian individuals should be appalled at this position for political gain. They are being used. And, it was all by design. Obama's campaign organization had created an ad to say how "backwards" Romney is before he even went out with his "evolving" change of position.

      Here's part of what has happened now – as the black clergy have now said – sorry Mr. President you've gone too far. The Bible hasn't changed its position on marriage. The churches support kindness and love for all people – but they will not go against the God's teachings to follow a man who is obviously out of touch with his "Christian" beliefs. Although there's not many of us who believe he is a Christian anyway. Sad shape we're in..... as a country, a people.

      May 15, 2012 at 6:34 am | Report abuse |
  6. DaRealist

    100 years from now, our children's children will look back at how primitive anti gay people were and be ashamed of their ancesters. History has proved my point time, and time again.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:40 pm | Report abuse |
    • NoPervs

      History has proved time and time again that all empires fell shortly after their moral character decayed into outright perversion.

      May 14, 2012 at 3:53 pm | Report abuse |
    • Cheryl

      God said let there be man, and from the man came the women. Now, that is the truth... Now, God didn't say let there be man, and from the man came another man... how could you reproduce... If it was man and man that would not be mathematics or science cause you couldn't solve the equaison, it's just not in the natural order of the universe. I guess the Male Lions will seek to have a union with another male Lion... I don't think so. If you choose to be gay that's on you, however, I don't accept that being gay is a civil right... it's a choice... just like if you choose to be a criminal, that's your choice... or anything else you choose... I will never go against God for man.

      May 14, 2012 at 4:05 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Truthhurts

    Obama made congress gay. The right married to the right, the left married to the left and nothing is being produced.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:40 pm | Report abuse |
  8. Wilder napalm

    God CNN is a conglomeration of idiots. Obama was not, I repeat, was not the first black president. Clinton was............

    May 14, 2012 at 3:41 pm | Report abuse |
  9. xabana

    Get over it, black community, lest you lose all support from your friends.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:42 pm | Report abuse |
  10. E Mallach

    If Obama is the first gay president, then Abraham Lincoln was the first black president. They both stood up for other people's civil rights despite pressure to take the easy way out and not to do that.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:42 pm | Report abuse |
  11. communicator1453

    I don't know quite how to react to Newsweek's cover, but President Obama has my vote in 2012. Regardless of widespread public perception, gay rights are an economic issue for millions of workers who deserve equal benefits for their loved ones and the ability to inherit estates of departed partners. If they want to be married, they should be able to join in holy matrimony.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:43 pm | Report abuse |
  12. BE KIND

    Why can't folks just respect their neighbors and support equal rights for ALL Americans? It's really that basic.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:44 pm | Report abuse |
  13. John

    Cheney and Laura Bush were both for gay marraige,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,but isn't it strange how none of these right wing bloggers ever called Cheney "gay"................little hypocricy here............

    May 14, 2012 at 3:44 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Darryl P.

    This will go to FEDERAL and it will be Law of the Land.Thats the way the Federal Goverment is set up and it's already in the Federal Law Books. It's just that NO President has ever brought it out and supported it on this level.But you'll see the F.G. will tell everyone it's ok and it's a law and it protects even gay people just like it should.Look it up. you'll see for yourself.

    May 14, 2012 at 3:44 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Darth Revan

    Go Sith or Go Home!

    May 14, 2012 at 3:45 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52