New documents shed light on Trayvon Martin killing
May 17th, 2012
09:47 PM ET

New documents shed light on Trayvon Martin killing

New documents released today shed light on just what might have happened when George Zimmerman fatally shot Trayvon Martin, 17, in Sanford Florida earlier this year.

An autopsy report revealed traces of the drug THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana,  in Martin's blood at the time of his death - fueling more controversy in the already heavily debated circumstances of the killing.

Meanwhile, three police reports chronicled Zimmerman's injuries, officer's first impressions of the crime scene and claims that he was assaulted in the moments before shooting Martin dead. An EMS report and a lab report were made public describing injuries Zimmerman sustained during the melee.

Also released was an FBI analysis of the controversial 911 call, which caused speculation around the country about Zimmerman's potential use of a racial epithet to described the  teen in the hooded sweatshirt.

Zimmerman has plead not guilty in the case, maintaining he shot Martin in self-defense during his shift on a neighborhood watch.

Bond for Zimmerman was originally set at $150,000 on April 20. Zimmerman's bond was revoked on June 1 and he was ordered to return to jail when a judge determined Zimmerman lied about his personal finances. A new bail hearing is sceduled for June 29.

Post by:
Filed under: Justice • Uncategorized
soundoff (224 Responses)
  1. Red Blooded American

    Your "Secondly" is a blatant lie. His words were "I'm sorry your child is dead. Which in no way is an apology for defending himself against a drugged up 6' 3" attacker. It's like saying "I'm sorry you feel that way" which is no apology at all but many "less than intelligent people" take it as an opology and walk off until they later figure out they were duped.

    May 18, 2012 at 10:59 am | Report abuse |
  2. Red Blooded American

    Can the girlfriend testify HONESTLY as to what Zimmerman said before or after the telephone conversation? Can she testify as to what Zimmerman did say DURING the telephone converstion? I'll answer for you....... NO SHE CAN NOT. And that is what will come out in court as eveidence.

    May 18, 2012 at 11:02 am | Report abuse |
  3. Kavonprice

    I'm just say thats wrong that boy was17 years old.now what if sum one shoot yo 17 year old boy shoot and killed.how would u feel u took them people babe u cant bring him back.u just cant.

    May 18, 2012 at 11:36 am | Report abuse |
  4. lorrainne

    It is so sad that people are saying that this child deserved to lose his life. No matter what happened no one and I mean no one black or white deserves to be killed over something so petty. Yes Zimmerman profield this child and shame on him for that. Stop all the hatred. Instead feel for everyone involved everybody has loss something.

    May 18, 2012 at 11:51 am | Report abuse |
  5. Serenity

    Very well said. I've been asking myself the same question since this all started.

    May 18, 2012 at 12:20 pm | Report abuse |
  6. Red Blooded American

    As usual, posts that are pro-Zimmerman are disappearing CNN is playing to the blacks.

    May 18, 2012 at 2:24 pm | Report abuse |
    • Blue Blooded

      A person can be pro-Zimmerman with totally trashing the victim by saying nasty, pro-racist things. The majority if deleted posts did just that.

      May 18, 2012 at 2:37 pm | Report abuse |
    • Blue Blooded

      That should read *without* trashing the victim.

      May 18, 2012 at 2:40 pm | Report abuse |
    • doug

      to: Red Blooded American

      i bet you were PROUDLY wearing your White pointed hat, and White gown, when you made your latest posts here !!

      you need to change our username to Red Blooded Prejudiced American.

      pls look at some FACTS out there, before you post, and make your self look COMPLETELY stupid.

      Trayvon was 5 ft – 11 inches, in offical police autopsy.

      NOT 6 ft – 3 in as U posted, and as many ultra conservative, & prejudiced news has reported.

      but i know you want to believe 6-3 in your warped prejudice mind, because it gives you verifiction that Martin was a BIG BAD BLACK PERSON, that deserved to be shot & killed.

      CNN is playing to the FACTS (not Balcks)
      but FOX & some others in news, are playing to the racists, like U.

      i bet you vote Republican ALWAYS, in ALL elections.
      and w/o loooking at any FACTS there either, just like here.
      .

      May 18, 2012 at 8:02 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Dibert

    If this young man "broke Zimmerman's nose" and there are is no bruising around the eyes, no means shown to correct a break, etc....it has been known that there are "victims" who get people to corroborate injuries for them...remember the lady who killed her husband and then went on to bash her head, bruise her hands, etc., because she had been beaten by him....many things happened in the minds of people like zimmerman....Oh! Yes! it is known to happen....

    May 18, 2012 at 3:34 pm | Report abuse |
  8. Bubba

    Forensic evidence, eye witness, 911 tapes photos and police reports all consistent with Zimmerman 's story. And dead men tell no tales. Sooooo..... NOT GUILTY

    May 18, 2012 at 8:49 pm | Report abuse |
    • doug

      wrong. study ALL the facts out there. there is a lot of evidence to me, that this is manslaughter by Zimm. Zimm confronted Trayvon first.

      May 19, 2012 at 2:03 am | Report abuse |
  9. Bubba

    Forensic evidence, police reports, photos, 911 tapes of Zimmerman steaming for help, and even eye witnesses ....support Zimmerman s story. Martins own mother had to admit that the cries for help on the 911 tape was NOT her son.

    This whole circus is a form if appeasement for the black race batters like Al Sharpman.

    May 18, 2012 at 8:58 pm | Report abuse |
    • doug

      dude – where do u get your false INFO ??? Martin MOM and DAD both statd to police, while listening to 911 calls at Police station after, that the SCREAMS WERE DEFINITLEY TRAYVON. BOTH parents told police that was their opinion of the vocie on 911 tape. i have listened to 911 MANY TIMES.
      it definitley sounds like a KID crying to me.

      voice analysts said after, it was almost certaily NOT Zimm on tape, but too didtorted to tell 100%.
      and the family had no voice sample of Trayvon, for analyst to comapare.
      .

      May 19, 2012 at 2:08 am | Report abuse |
    • Pete

      @Bubba,I'm surprised Zimmerman didn't shoot himself while loading that 9 mm piece of crap,typical wanne be cop,that's all.He's guilty and everyone here knows it.Ya,can't tell me he couldn't of shot Trayvon in his leg,he'd go down then,but no,shoot him point blank range in the heart,dead people can't tell on ya,can they!!!!

      May 19, 2012 at 11:32 am | Report abuse |
  10. Bubba

    They didn't test Zimmerman for drugs
    ..lol... ooops we forgot. Too late now. 😉

    May 18, 2012 at 9:46 pm | Report abuse |
    • doug

      at least u did get this PART correct.

      it was certainly an OOPS by Police.

      but they didn't FORGET.

      at least usually inept Sanford Police OFFICERS, DID want to arrest Zimm THAT NIGHT, for Manslaughter.
      but Plice Chief & States Attorney, said NO CHARGES.
      so they didn't test anything on Zimm.

      definitley ANOTHER screw up here, by all of Fla Justcie System.

      they decided NOT to test Zimm that night, because States Attounery would not let Police file charges that night.

      May 19, 2012 at 2:25 am | Report abuse |
  11. Smako

    The autopsy report said the shot was fired from within 36 inches. Three feet, not point blank which would have shown evidence that the shot was fired during a fight. You can't shoot someone on the ground and call it self defense. Zim was standing and the kid was on the ground when witnesses looked out after the shot.
    The trial will give the details of exactly what position Travon was in when he was shot. Any way you look at it, Neighborhood Watch does not make you licensed to carry a gun or be deputized, it does not give you the authority to confront or detain, you are just a witness. If he just followed Travon at a distance to see where he was going none of this would have made the news. Evidence shows he followed and confronted, if he didn't, again, none of this would have made the news.

    May 19, 2012 at 3:35 pm | Report abuse |
    • mickey1313

      That's what he did, then martin rushed him, slammed him down ( hence the back of the head wound) then zimmerman got up and shot him. Martin was the aggressor and the murder 2 charge will never stick. The reverse racists are so full of it.

      May 19, 2012 at 6:11 pm | Report abuse |
    • PC

      He was legally carrying a firearm, and he began a verbal 'confrontation' if you so desire to call it that. The instant someone turns a verbal confrontation into a physical confrontation (first attack) the initial attacker is at fault; anything thereafter in the course of the fight can be seen as self defense up until the point where the aggressor is subdued. The question that will make or break this for both parties is: who initiated the PHYSICAL confrontation. Verbal confrontation and talking 'mean' is typically irrelevant; it comes down to who struck who first.

      May 23, 2012 at 2:12 am | Report abuse |
    • Marion

      PC

      He was legally carrying a firearm, and he began a verbal 'confrontation' if you so desire to call it that. The instant someone turns a verbal confrontation into a physical confrontation (first attack) the initial attacker is at fault; anything thereafter in the course of the fight can be seen as self defense up until the point where the aggressor is subdued. The question that will make or break this for both parties is: who initiated the PHYSICAL confrontation. Verbal confrontation and talking 'mean' is typically irrelevant; it comes down to who struck who first.

      No....it comes down to "who struck who first.....AND WHY!!

      May 24, 2012 at 10:02 am | Report abuse |
    • Larry

      Point blank means that the target is not likely to be missed. Within 36" also includes measurements of 1" or even less.

      You think about this.

      You are lying on your back. Someone is bashing your head into the concrete. You get your gun and pull it up to your chest and fire. Distance from your chest to the person's stomach could be as little as 1" or as much as 24", if the person is sitting on your groin.

      Furthermore, you say you can't shoot someone on the ground and call it self defense. Then you qualify it by saying after the shot was fired, witnesses showed Zimmerman standing up. This is another fail my friend. Zimmerman shot him Martin was on top of him. He shot him because he could not stop him. The shot stopped him, then he freed himself.

      This entire case is a waste of time and is only occurring because of public pressure.

      More facts will certainly come out, but based on the entire and unedited 911 calls, the media and also the prosecutor are misleading the public regarding Zimmerman's refusal to stop following Martin.

      Everyone should understand that this case is extremely dangerous to our individual rights.

      June 1, 2012 at 3:00 pm | Report abuse |
    • Just Me

      Well said!!!!

      June 1, 2012 at 3:29 pm | Report abuse |
    • Nolegirl

      Bill from Rochester, get your facts straight because I do recall them saying Zimmerman weighed more than Trayvon. No one will ever know what happened, however, the FACT that the 911 operator instructed him not to pursue Trayvon and he did makes him guilty. He obviously has problems following instructions and since he did get out his car and follow him anyway making the situation worse...he killed the kid because he was mad Trayvon was whooping his a**.

      June 1, 2012 at 3:31 pm | Report abuse |
    • VetPat

      Neighborhood watch doesn't give him the right to carry a gun but the State of Florida did!

      June 1, 2012 at 6:17 pm | Report abuse |
    • jesussaves

      I totally agree and I also want to add: If anyone is followed or stalked at night by someone they do not know or even identifies themselves how would you response? If anything Martin felt a sense apprehension and needed to defend himself or get out of the situation. This is very sad because this all could have been avoided if Zimmerman followed direction and did not let his prejudice or personal bias dictate his actions. It is foolish for him to cry self- defence when he instigated the whole situation.

      June 5, 2012 at 3:39 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tiberois

      Let me attack you and see if you shoot me, what a crock.

      June 8, 2012 at 7:21 am | Report abuse |
  12. Mkeey

    what we still don't know is if or not Zimmerman was drunk on the night he killed Trayvon Martin. Was there any alcohol blood test made on Zimmerman by the Sanford Police?His Zimmerman addicted to alcohol? Why are we not getting all these Information

    May 22, 2012 at 7:20 am | Report abuse |
    • Marion

      Why are you not listening? Maybe you think YOU are "not getting the information", but the rest of us who actually read the articles and listen to the media reports know that there was never any drug or alcohol testing done on Zimmerman that night.

      May 24, 2012 at 10:06 am | Report abuse |
  13. Mkeey

    One thing that we all have to look into here Independent of race, color or ethnicity is; is it alright for someone to kill any of our children with the pretence that he was defending him or herself and putting into wide scope the way the incident occurred and be sent free? I know of a case in Florida of a woman sentence to 20yrs of only just scaring her husband with a short of gun did not kill the husband and this same husband has been reported violence history by the police against his sentenced wife. And a 12yrs old boy that was charged for first degree murder for killing his little sister, locked up in adult jail and would not have probation if sentence. 12yrs old charged as an adult? Now Zimmer has done nothing wrong? What in the hell is wrong with America!!? Now just imagine that that woman was White and the 12yrs old boy was white but the fact here is that both the woman and that 12yrs old boy were both black….

    May 22, 2012 at 7:42 am | Report abuse |
    • mostdesireable@gmail.com

      why oh why do you have to make this a race issue?????

      June 9, 2012 at 3:07 pm | Report abuse |
  14. PC

    He was legally carrying a firearm, and he began a verbal 'confrontation' if you so desire to call it that. The instant someone turns a verbal confrontation into a physical confrontation (first attack) the initial attacker is at fault; anything thereafter in the course of the fight can be seen as self defense up until the point where the initial aggressor is subdued. The question that will make or break this for both parties is: who initiated the PHYSICAL confrontation. Verbal confrontation and talking 'mean' is typically irrelevant; it comes down to who struck who first.

    May 23, 2012 at 2:20 am | Report abuse |
  15. funked

    Not kid...17 year old Young MAN...

    If he hurt someone would he have not been charged as an ADULT, according to definitions of Laws.
    So if he struck Zman, HE was acting as an ADULT, and got TREATED as one.

    It really isn't THAT complicated, they have SOLD you, and your PUPPET Strings are SHOWING!!!

    May 24, 2012 at 3:01 am | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7