- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 59,754,767
More than 91,000 people in the US were hospitalized with coronavirus Saturday, more than at any previous point in ttwitter.com/i/web/status/1…qb
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 59,754,767
An Oregon mink farm reports an outbreak of coronavirus among farmworkers and minks. The virus has been detected intwitter.com/i/web/status/1…Fu
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 59,754,767
A second person has died after a shooting Friday at a mall in Sacramento, California, police say cnn.it/2JoliYm
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 59,754,767
Pope Francis has elevated Archbishop Wilton Gregory to cardinal, the first African American in Catholic history totwitter.com/i/web/status/1…vN
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 59,754,767
More than 60 people have been arrested during an anti-lockdown protest in London, police said cnn.it/3liEVOO
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 59,754,767
Fierce fighting has broken out in the capital of Ethiopia's Tigray region, eyewitnesses say cnn.it/36dSsmA
- @cnnbrk
- Followers: 59,754,767
Tony Hsieh, the former CEO of Zappos, dies at 46 cnn.it/3mmbUDy
CNN POLITICS ON FACEBOOK » | CNN POLITICS ON TWITTER »
New York mayor wants big sugary drinks banned
If New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has his way, you won't be gulping down any 44-ounce Cokes at any of the Big Apple's eateries after March 2013.
Citing what he says is the contribution sugary beverages make to obesity in the U.S., Bloomberg says the buck, and the big Dr. Pepper, stops with him.
“Obesity is a nationwide problem, and all over the United States, public health officials are wringing their hands saying, ‘Oh, this is terrible.’ New York City is not about wringing your hands; it’s about doing something. I think that’s what the public wants the mayor to do,” Bloomberg told The New York Times.
Is drinking soda really that bad for you? | What is high fructose corn syrup?
His proposal would ban any the sale of any sugary beverage over 16 ounces in any of the city's restaurants, delis, movie theaters or even street carts, according to reports from New York.
Sales of sweetened drinks larger than 16 ounces would still be permitted in supermarkets and convenience stores, according to the reports, including one from CNN affiliate NY1.
Bloomberg's ban would not apply to diet drinks, juices, milkshakes or alcohol, according to the NY1 report.
The New York City Beverage Association responded quickly Wednesday.
“There they go again. The New York City Health Department’s unhealthy obsession with attacking soft drinks is again pushing them over the top. The city is not going to address the obesity issue by attacking soda because soda is not driving the obesity rates. It’s time for serious health professionals to move on and seek solutions that are going to actually curb obesity,” the group said in a statement, according to NY1.
According to the Times report, more than half of New York's adults are obese or overweight, and the city says more than 30% of its citizens drink at least one sweetened beverage daily.
Child obesity ads aim to create movement out of controversy
James Estrada, a 41-year-old truck driver from Queens, New York told the New York Post that it doesn't make sense to just ban large sizes for everyone.
“I’m 6-2, 230 pounds so . . . serving sizes don’t really apply to me,” Estrada told the Post. “I just know that’s not enough for me. I usually get a large because it’s a good deal and I take long trips. I don’t want to stop every hour for another drink.”
If Bloomberg's plan goes through, there's still a way to drown yourself in Pepsi. The Times says while fast-food restaurants could only give out cups holding 16 ounces or less, free refills are allowed. So just plan for more trips to the soda bar.
On Twitter
This is idiotic. It's actually insulting for a city government (or any other) to tell me what I can and cannot eat/drink, OR to prevent some establishments from selling perfectly legal items to me if I want to buy them. This is the opposite of a free market policy.
Toga party, tonight. Toga! Toga! Toga. Aaaahhhhhhhhhh!!!!
It's too bad people are so fat and lazy they can't figure out for themselves how to eat and drink well. If you are annoyed by this, you might actually 'need' someone to tell you what to do. Obese and unhealthy people cost us all. Health costs and general speaking a lack of productivity. There's little doubt this is a contributor to America having to rally to maintain it's position in the world.
My BMI is in the normal range. I don't LIKE anything carbonated. And I no longer live near NYC. So I'm not one of the people you're referring to. But I STILL think this is a bad idea. It's not the government's business if I want to hurt myself, whether it's by drinking soda or climbing Half-Dome. It should be up to an individual, not a government, what risk that individual chooses to accept into their lives.
People have the ability to be smart enough to make there own choices about what they eat and drink. People that make bad choices are aware of it. They make this choice and bring the consequences upon themselves. They will be the ones that have dumpy and disgusting lives. Don't force everybody to follow a ban that would impact tons of people when only certain ones need it.
Right on Bill! I don't like government stepping in, but when people are too lazy, dumb, or unwilling to do what's right, then government has no choice.
I think it is a good idea. I dont think iti s over the top goverment control. The problem is all these obese people that end up with diabetes and medical problems that us taxpayers have to food the bill for! Ban them. Drink a big glass of water if you are thirsty!!!
Yet you probably are in favor of Obamacare, which is nothing but a control mechanism.
I have seen a lot of fat people drinking 12 oz. Diet Cokes.
So, cigarettes OK, but big drinks banned?
Alcohol OK, big drinks banned?
Fatty food OK, but drinks banned?
NYC has banned public smoking.
Since I pay 100% of my own health insurance, I'm paying a portion (albeit small) of other people's diabetes treatments. I want everybody within my "pool" to be as healthy as possible, so I'm totally in favor of this. I gave up soda at the behest of my doctor...it was not easy, but I have noticed the health benefits.
Are you lobbying to have everyone else in your "pool" required to wear a helmet in the bathroom? After all, falls in the shower are a major cause of injury and death.
That's part of a pseudo socialist system, which every successful country has some degree of. You still pay taxes to fund schools even if you don't have any children too. Socialist. Now what if the government starts regulating something you care about? I bet your opinion will do a quick 180.
I pay 100% of my Health insurance as well, & I'm diabetic. I rarely drink soda, & when I do, it's sugar-free. Never smoked, & try to maintain healthy eating habits. I do all of this through– my personal choice. And I couldn't be more against this law. Few things are more immoral than this.
You're in favor of this law, only because it doesn't effect your freedom of choice. The next law might. Every right we have basically comes down to freedom of choice. Governments that try to regulate that choice soon find themselves no longer the government. Brute force keeps them in power for awhile sometimes, but eventually they are destroyed. History is littered with them.
People, the problem here is not that there are compulsory people who must have their 64oz. drinks. Those who do will find their way around this law regardless. It's the fact that most of us subconsciously over-drink and take in too much sugar. The law simply helps us get rid of this habit. What's the harm in that? Also, if McDonald's offers me the opportunity to put on my own salt like they do in Europe, I'd be more than glad to take it.
I'm fine with salting my own fries to taste, but either I'm an adult in a free country who can make his own choice or I'm not. The government says I am, but their actions betray their lie.
What is Emperor Bloomberg's next step? Telling people they can't smoke or drink in their own homes? And they must eat their broccoli.
Vote the self appointed Czar out of office.
If you think this is a stupid or ridiculous idea, please read the book "Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness". Kindle edition is only $6.
So you're suggesting I should read a book about why the government should regulate my personal choices rather than just doing it myself? No, it IS a stupid idea. If people want to be fat, they'll find a way unless the government becomes the biggest brother ever.
Making better decisions is not the same thing as an authority taking away the freedom to make those decisions from you.
@PDX – the book explains how to help people make better decisions without taking away their freedom, being overbearing or banning things. "government is telling me what to drink" is hyperbole, and it is not the case there. You can drink as much soda as you want in NYC, of whichever type you want. You can by 2 16 oz drinks or 10 16oz drinks and drink them all freely. But by making healthier choices more easily and readily accessible, you encourage better choices (again, without taking away any freedoms).
Unbelievable. What's next? Prohibition?
I have never before seen a less free "free" country. We are going in the complete wrong direction, and Bloomberg feeding the GOP tigers' efforts to regulate our entire lives is a disgrace.
II'll just pick up a two liter bottle and drink the whole thing in the same time frame. If they make a ban this stupid, I'll double my consumption to anger them more. They'll be better off just staying out of it. I could just also order 4 drinks, what's the point? The ban just wastes tax payer money. No law will stop me.
Now that's stupid Ken. You won't anger anyone by consuming more, you'll just have a massive coronary like the rest of fatties. It's restricting eateries and fast food places who prey on people who think a good deal is buying food they shouldn't be eating to begin with.
LEAVE MY RIGHTS ALONE!!!!! – BLOOMBERG HAS NO RIGHT TO TELL ME THAT I CAN'T BUY A LARGE DRINK IF I EVER VISIT HIS NASTY CITY....MAYBE HE SHOULD SPEND MORE TIME CLEANING UP THE STREETS AND NOT DICTATING WHAT PEOPLE CAN DRINK.
How do these officials get elected having such absurdly high levels of immorality?