A rare event is said to happen once in a blue moon. But a blue moon has nothing on a blue lobster.
Canadian lobster boat captain Bobby Stoddard said he and his crew were hauling in their lobster traps one day in early May when one of the men called out, "Hey, we got a pretty one in this trap!"
"I turned around and said, 'Holy smoke!' " said Stoddard, 51, of Clarks Harbour, Nova Scotia.
In the trap with three other, ordinary greenish-brown lobsters was a remarkably bright blue one, the first lobster of that hue Stoddard had seen in his 33 years of fishing for a living.
"This is the only one that I've ever seen," he told CNN. "And my dad has been a lobsterman of about 55 years, and he caught one about 45 years ago, but hadn't seen one since."
Bobby Stoddard, lobster hunter
Stoddard captains one lobster boat, his father another, and his three brothers work with them. On a good day, they haul in about 3,000 of the crustaceans, he said. Multiply that times 33 seasons, and that's a lot of lobsters. But only one blue one.
According to the University of Maine Lobster Institute, blue lobsters are a one-in-2-million phenomenon. A genetic variation causes the lobster to produce an excessive amount of a particular protein that gives it that azure aspect.
Stoddard offered his find (a male, by the way) to a nearby ocean research institute, but "they didn't seem too interested," he said.
His girlfriend pushed him to offer it for sale for on the classified-ad site Kajiji.com, he said. Having no idea what the market for a 1.5-pound blue lobster might be, he priced it at $200.
"I wanted to put a number high enough on it so nobody would be interested in it," Stoddard confessed.
However, he said he started to get some "weird" phone calls and e-mails scolding him for trying to sell such a rare creature, so he canceled the ad.
"I'm kind of a shy guy," he said. "When things get controversial, I kind of go hide. This is what I do for a living; I catch lobsters and sell them. I'm just trying to do the right thing. I thought, 'I just don't need this hassle.' "
For now, the cerulean crustacean is residing comfortably in a nice, cold holding tank at Stoddard's business, feeding on bits of fish and mollusks as normal. A massive aquarium is under construction near the CN Tower in Toronto, but Stoddard hasn't decided whether to offer his specimen for display there.
"I don't know what the best thing is to do," he said. "It probably belongs back in the ocean, but I'd like for as many people as possible to see it."
Related stories:
Blue lobsters aren't the only rare ones - what about calico lobsters?
And then of course, there are always really, really big lobsters as well.
Pretty cool – but when I read stories like this, I wonder "What if ?" What if sea creatures or birds picked up and carried off a human being to their environment? What if animals had People Zoos?
We find some wonderful things – I love aquariums because, short of diving, I'd never see those creatures
BUT Man is just way too good at spoiling the wonders of nature
Please put it back in the ocean! How is it supposed to pass on the gene that makes it blue if you keep it by itself for the rest of its life or kill it?
I agree. He's beautiful and should go back in the water and left alone.
its atypical ... its the result of random mutation. and there maybe a reason why there are so few .... blue is easier to spot on the rock bottom than brown.
So hes doing the lobster a favor.
I suspect he "offered" the blue lobster to a conservancy at a price that was quite unappetizing. When given the opportunity to do something altruistic, what would a typical person do?
The guy didn't want to kill it, but for some reason no one else wants it. If you put it back in the ocean its more likely to become part of the circle of life than if you keep it and try to make another blue one. So choose which is more important, its freedom, or preserving the blue because you plan is contradictory.
I was scuba diving once, and there was this kid fishing on shore catching small mackeral. I asked if I could have a couple. he gave me 2. said i was going to feed the lobsters. got down to the bottm, and found a lobster hiding under a rock, kind of burrowed under it. the hole was smaller than he was so he looked a little trapped. but there was plenty of life in him. I dangled the nose of the fish in front of his nose, and latched onto that pretty quick lol. I played tug of war for 10 seconds or so, he wasnt letting go for nothing haha. right after I let go he stuffed that whole 8" mackeral into his mouth and swallowed it whole.peeked into his hole with my dive light and could see the tip of the tail sticking out his mouth. he was hungry
Now that's a whopper of a fish story. Nice fable, Joe.
Well, he was good not to eat the poor thing and selling it to someone who might, a good aquarium that might want it would be a good thing , they would also know how to keep this rare creature alive and well. Good luck to him and the lobster!
$200? Should start the price at $2,000. Them things are super rare.
"I don't know what the best thing is to do," he said. How about returning it to the sea where it belongs and finding a different profession instead of murdering innocent animals for profit and depleting the ocean of its natural resources!
I agree about returning it to the ocean. But, find another career? Boy, you're naive. Life feeds on life. You may as well stand up for the rights of carrots. Why is no one protecting them?
Tell ya what. Convince the lion to step away from the gazelle—for good. Do that and I'll gladly go vegan. In the meantime I'll continue my omnivorous ways.
I'm all for returning Blue to the ocean so s/he can spread her gene. As for the rest of your comment, does the phrase "food chain" mean anything to you?
Paul, lions are obligate carnivores while humans are omnivores. Besides, lions don't use technology to clean out the savannah of all prey, leaving all other predators to starve as well. When prey get scarce, lions die. When humans fish out the seas (North Atlantic cod, NA bluefin tuna, soon halibut, soon sharks), what will happen to us and the rest of the marine food chain? It's a matter of sustainability, not an absolute ban. Problem is, humans aren't capable of restraining themselves.
waaah waaaah waaaah – lobster is tasty.
I think this beauty earned a right to go back into the ocean and make more lobsters. It's gorgeous. How could anyone think of eating it?
Video tape it, or have a National Geo photographer take a high quality photo of it, then bring it back to where you caught it and set it free.
Why? So some fish can eat it? No, you need to find another blue one of the opposite gender and breed them.
i have a friend who caught one while checking his lobsters traps in the cape cod canal --its now on display in a tank
I wants to buy and keep like pet and find a another regular and try to see if can produce another of same color, (lobster farming) if possible
thx
You can already buy cobalt blue lobsters as pets
You have a picture of it, so put it back into the ocean where it can produce some baby blues.
Eat it with some butter, veggies and maybe some fries. Who knows you might turn blue too!
Why does the though of NOT killing something truly special upsets you so much.
"why does the though" ?????
I don't know why I posted that spelling correction for Tom's comment. I must be a complete idiot with the typist's equivalent of Tourette's Syndrome. I'll go away now.
Correction troll be gone!....I banish you to the land of Typographical Errors....A.k.a CNN.
Tom obviously forgot the "t" at the end of "though". not that hard to figure out
Really? It's not that hard to figure out....
Add a 't' to that mentally, and you suddenly have a word.
Guess that makes me a s a v a g e. Mmmm, with melted butter!
Any normal caring human being would be upset at the way these are boiled alive. Why can't they be killed first. That part I don't understand. Think about it would you as a living creature wish to die before being boiled? Sure hope they let it go but probably not. Money is what is important right?
The need to be boiled alive because of the toxins in their blood – I can't quote exactly why, but it has to do with the amount of copper in their blood – Once they die starts to pollute their body and makes eating them toxic to humans, but if they die while being cooked it prevents it from being released.
I'm sure I got it wrong, but there is a real reason they need to be cooked alive-
as long as you kill them IMMEDIATELY before boiling, you CAN kill them in a humane way as I described. Just jam a knife right behind the brain.
They're boiled alive because the suffering enhances the flavor.
Wrong. Lobsters are cooked many other ways besides being boiled and they are always killed first, usually with a knife. I would know, i almost got sent home from my first kitchen job as a teenager because i refused to cut the lobster in half while it was still alive!
Scrumps, you got it partially right. No, lobsters don't contain any toxins but they do decay rapidly if left at room temperature. People who cook their own lobsters and have some compassion typically take a large piece of ice and ice down the lobster's brain for 5 minutes before adding to boiling water. Presumably, an iced brain responds slowly to painful stimuli. However, the lobsters I observed even after icing still went nuts as soon as they were dropped in the water, suggesting a very painful death indeed. Perhaps they should get an icepick to the brain immediately prior to cooking for a quick, humane death.
It is not true that they need to be boiled alive. The most humane way to cook them is to kill them by severing their "spinal cord" essentially behind their head, which kills them immediately, then put them in boiling water.
Boiling them is the safest and fastest way for them to die. Yes it sounds cruel but they are dead within seconds of hitting the water. They go into shock and die almost immediately.
Yeah I don't believe that. That's just what they say to calm peoples nerves. Just like they say you die of shock before you hit the ground if your falling out of the sky. Total BS they should kill the lobster first.
Too bad almost every normal caring human being disagrees with you. Guess you are the abnormal
you don't have to boil them alive. You can shove a knife in the back of their brain to kill them instantly.
It is pretty sad,especially since they scream O_O I'm not like so worried about animals and stuff that I won't eat em,but I feel bad for the lobsters out of all of them. đź™
That "scream" is steam escaping their shells...Lobsters and Crabs cannot actually scream....its kind of like when you boil water in a tea kettle. the water boils and gasses are forced out of a small opening while the rest of it is sealed.. making a whistling noise.
The "screaming" you hear is pressure releasing from the shell. Lobsters don't have vocal chords thus making it impossible to produce any vocal sound.
lilith, they don't scream, that is a myth. I've heard their nervous system is so unevolved they hardly feel pain. But that may just be something to make the squeamish lobster-lover feel better. The problem I have with eating lobster is that they can live so long, over 100 years. It just seems a shame to kill something with the potential of such a long life.
They can and should be killed first–it's not difficult and can be done pretty humanely. The thing about lobsters is that their meat starts to go bad as soon as they die, so it needs to be done just before they're cooked. I agree that I hope this lobster doesn't end up as dinner. The captain sounds like a pretty decent guy– and from what I've heard about lobster fishing, it's not something you go into to get rich.
Their nerve system does not have pain receptors.
The reason lobsters are boiled alive is that in insures a safe eating product. You need to know that the lobster is alive (or very recently killed) because if you boil a dead lobster;
1- you may not know when it died
2- if it died more that a couple of hours before cooking, you will poison yourself by eating it. The toxins that develop in dead crustaceans can be deadly to humans.
The other question; how to you kill a lobster in a "humane way"? Do you poke it with a skewer between the eyes and hope to reach the brain?, do you bash it on the counter and hope that it dies?, do you hang it from a mini home made gallows? Your suggestions are welcome...
They taste best boiled with real butter on them...yum!
Because the fear adds flavor.....bwaa ha ha haaaa
The lobsters are boiled alive because they contain a bacteria in them that will cause the meat to go bad quickly after death. Also, lobsters have no central nervous system and there is no time to process that it is in pain prior to death.
I'm a normal caring human being and if the fisherman who caught it chooses to not kill it, I have no problem with that. It appears as if YOU have a problem if he chooses to kill it or sell/give it to someone who will kill it and consume it's tasty tasty flesh. It's an animal. Of course no HUMAN would want to be boiled alive. . .but the lobster has no concept of it's impending fate in the same fashion that a human would. You are projecting human emotion and reason onto something that is incapable of them. I know YOU feel like you're a better person because you "care" about this animal. . .but the animal doesn't care that you care and it doesn't care about it's fate. It just is. It is spawned, it eats, it breeds and it dies. There is no emotion or sentiment associated with its existence at all. If you choose not to eat animals. . .great. You SHOULD do things that make you feel better. But don't judge others who make different choices through the lens of your artificial and essentially irrational view of animal consciousness, emotion and mortality.
Some people may think it's cruel to cook a lobster alive. The lobster's brain is extremely small and it lacks a central nervous system. By the time the lobster is put into the water, there is no time for it to process pain before it dies. Lobsters must be cooked alive because bacteria will enter the meat quickly destroying it. There really is no alternative, for your own safety. Never eat a cooked lobster that has a curled tail. That means the lobster died before it was cooked.
They can be killed easily with a blow right on center of their head but those suckers won't do it. They are enjoying it by throwing them alive in the steamer. I wish them from the bottom of my heart to turn into lobsters upon their death as humans, and get caught in the net, see how they like it then.
I care, Lizabeth...I care how delicious they are gonna taste as I cook them alive. Who cares what they feel?
So we should kill them BEFORE we kill them...got it...oh and hate that money!! It is the least important thing in the world. It dosen't do anything for anyone.
Because as soon as you let them die, bacteria in their body that their biology keeps in check quickly start to spoil the flesh. You must cook it right away – so they could stab them right before they boiled them, but I'm not sure you'd find that any more humane.
oh please.
Amen. It's really beautiful. What is wrong with us that we feel this need to have to rush to kill things, first thing?
I agree with the donation to a public Aquarium. They could also release it, but it could again end up in a net. I applaud Bobby Stoddard for keeping the Beautiful Blue Dude alive and fed. Way to go, Bobby!
It looks delicious!
Will people try to keep them now to try to breed more blue ones?