Poll: Catching criminals is fine, but don't use drones for speeding tickets, Americans say
The FAA says many universities, companies and government organizations are developing and producing 155 drone designs.
June 13th, 2012
02:30 PM ET

Poll: Catching criminals is fine, but don't use drones for speeding tickets, Americans say

Go ahead and use drones to track down criminals, to combat illegal immigration or for search-and-rescue missions. But to issue traffic citations?

No way, say Americans.

A recent Monmouth University poll showed there was overwhelming support for using unmanned aircraft in a variety of circumstances, but routine police work was not one of them.

Fewer than a quarter of the 1,708 adults surveyed last week said they would OK the use of drones to issue speeding tickets. Sixty-seven percent said they opposed the idea, and 10% had no opinion. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.4 percentage points (view a PDF here).

Compare that with the approval ratings for other drone applications: illegal immigration (64%), rescue missions (80%) and locating criminals (67%). The poll also indicates that 64% of Americans would be concerned about their privacy if U.S. law enforcement agencies began using drones with high-tech cameras.

Under the FAA Modernization and Reform Act, which President Barack Obama signed in February, the Federal Aviation Administration is charged with developing a plan “for the safe integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system as soon as practicable, but not later than September 30, 2015.”

The act is in response to the strict FAA regulations on drone use. It loosens those restrictions, allowing many government agencies to get swifter FAA permission to operate the unmanned aerial vehicles. It also allows any "government public safety agency to operate unmanned aircraft weighing 4.4 pounds or less," if certain criteria are met.

The FAA has authorized drone use for dozens of entities, including more than 20 universities, the U.S. military, local police forces, the FBI, NASA and the U.S. departments of Agriculture, Interior and Energy.

Drone uses vary greatly, according to an FAA document issued in March that outlines how drones will be used in six test ranges.

Not only can their objectives encompass everything from surveillance to searches to air quality testing, they can take many forms. Wingspans range from 6 inches to 240 feet. Weights run the gamut from 4 ounces to 16 tons.

"One thing they have in common is that their numbers and uses are growing dramatically. In the United States alone, approximately 50 companies, universities and government organizations are developing and producing some 155 unmanned aircraft designs,” according to the FAA.

The agency says it will select the test ranges in late 2012, with the first location becoming operational in 2013. The FAA currently has a test site at New Mexico State University, which it’s been using since June 2011.

There have been few incidents with domestic drone use, aside from an accident this month when a $176 million Navy RQ-4A Global Hawk went down in a marsh outside Salisbury, Maryland.

Outside the U.S., however, there has been widespread opposition to American reliance on drones to take out terrorists. A recent Pew Research Center poll showed that the U.S. was the only country among 20 surveyed that approved of using drones to kill extremist leaders in countries such as Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.

Sixty-two percent of Americans approved of the strikes. The only country with an approval rate rivaling the U.S. was Britain with 44% (47% disapproved). Approval ratings for the other 18 countries ranged from 5% in Greece to 38% in Germany.

A separate Pew survey in Pakistan showed equally ardent opposition, with 58% of those surveyed saying the strikes were unnecessary, 58% saying they are conducted without government approval and 93% saying the attacks kill too many innocent people.

In an April letter to the FAA’s acting administrator, Michael Huerta, the chairmen of the Congressional Bipartisan Privacy Caucus said they had numerous concerns about how the drones would be used.

While lauding the benefits of deploying drones in U.S. airspace – including for “spotting wildfires and assessing natural disasters” – Reps. Ed Markey, D-Massachusetts, and Joe Barton, R-Texas, said “there is also the potential for drone technology to enable invasive and pervasive surveillance without adequate privacy protections."

“Many drones are designed to carry surveillance equipment, including video cameras, thermal imagers, radar and wireless network ‘sniffers,’ ” the representatives wrote. “The surveillance power of drones is amplified when the information from on-board sensors is used in conjunction with facial recognition, behavior analysis, license plate recognition or any other system than can identify and track individuals as they go about their daily lives.”

The congressmen closed by asking several questions. Among them: How does the FAA grant temporary licenses? Who has been certified in the past? Have any applications been denied, and if so, why? Is the public notified about where the drones are used? Who operates the drones? What data are collected? How does the FAA plan to make its drone use transparent?

The American Civil Liberties union also chimed in last year, saying that as drones become increasingly cheaper, law enforcement would ramp up its use of the technology, according to the December report, “Protecting Privacy From Aerial Surveillance: Recommendations for Government Use of Drone Aircraft.”

In the report, the watchdog group said drone usage should be limited to instances in which police believe they can collect evidence on a specific crime. If the drone will intrude on someone’s privacy, police should be required to obtain a warrant. There should also be restrictions on storing images of people, the ACLU said.

If the FAA cannot ensure people’s privacy, Congress should take action, the report demanded.

“The deployment of drone technology domestically could easily lead to police fishing expeditions and invasive, all-encompassing surveillance that would seriously erode the privacy that we have always had as Americans,” attorney Catherine Crump, one of the report’s co-authors, said.

In February, as the Senate considered HR 658 (the would-be FAA Modernization and Reform Act), the ACLU warned that Congress was trying to “fast-track domestic drone use” at the expense of Americans’ privacy.

In addition to concerns that unmanned aircraft crash more frequently than their manned counterparts, the ACLU said nothing in HR 658 addresses the “very serious privacy issues.”

“This bill would push the nation willy-nilly toward an era of aerial surveillance without any steps to protect the traditional privacy that Americans have always enjoyed and expected," wrote senior policy analyst Jay Stanley.

“We don’t want to wonder, every time we step out our front door, whether some eye in the sky is watching our every move.”

Overheard on CNN.com: Unmanned drones ignite domestic surveillance debate

Post by:
Filed under: Aviation • Crime • FAA • Politics • Technology • Terrorism • U.S.
soundoff (863 Responses)
  1. Patrick

    Now we are all criminals for traffic violations.
    The only crimal i see SAINT is the people stripping AMERICA'S freedom. TREASON!

    June 13, 2012 at 6:42 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Motorick

    ....and all the stupid sheep gave their blessing.....

    June 13, 2012 at 6:42 pm | Report abuse |
  3. Tomk777

    What happens if the government decides to use it for other reasons, say to spy on the people that don't agree with them.

    June 13, 2012 at 6:42 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Justin

    One nation under surveillance, divisible with subjugation, and prison for all.....

    June 13, 2012 at 6:42 pm | Report abuse |
  5. Stagnant at best

    Have you had enough government yet?

    June 13, 2012 at 6:42 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mike

      Good question. Someone said they'd rather not live in a police state and I wondered how long they had been sleeping considering seat belt laws have been here a while. The tip of the iceberg is large and no one is really sure where the water line was anyway.

      June 13, 2012 at 7:02 pm | Report abuse |
  6. Patrick

    Lesson On Liberty OBVIOUSLY!

    June 13, 2012 at 6:43 pm | Report abuse |
  7. mb2010a

    Time to exercise our second amendment rights...I wonder if that covers anti-aircraft missiles against drones in the US?

    June 13, 2012 at 6:43 pm | Report abuse |
  8. jaysargos


    June 13, 2012 at 6:43 pm | Report abuse |
  9. ken

    You thats a lot of drones flying around – its a danger to all of us.

    June 13, 2012 at 6:43 pm | Report abuse |
  10. Brian

    Go ahead and use them for the stuff I don't do, but if it could affect me (even though both are illegal)? NOOOOOOOOOO that's wrong.

    June 13, 2012 at 6:44 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Andrew

    I simply can't comprehend why everyone is so worried about this. If you're not regularly breaking the law, you shouldn't be concerned. Law Enforcement agencies already have manned helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft, and drones would simply be a cheaper supplement to those assets, used to keep the general public safe from dangerous criminals or other situations. There are dozens of uses for unmanned aircraft in true public safety settings, anywhere from manhunts to major fires or hazardous material incidents.

    June 13, 2012 at 6:44 pm | Report abuse |
  12. allenwoll

    NO NEED for Drones ! ! !

    The Automated Autonomous Automobile ("Driverless" Car) is coming soon to a street near you.

    EACH ONE will be an efficient traffic cop-car (whether YOU like it or NOT) : Speeders, Lane Weavers, Tail-Gaters, Overly Aggressive Drivers, Road-Ragers, Racers, Equipment Faults - Not to mention Cell-Phoners, Wireless Texters, etc - All will be recorded on video and the ticket/summons sent directly to your residence. . Your chance of beating the rap will be about ZERO ! . Pay up or do the time - In some cases, forfeit the car ! !

    The days of the Wildwest Lawless Streets and Highways are NUMBERED ! !

    June 13, 2012 at 6:44 pm | Report abuse |
  13. jaysargos


    June 13, 2012 at 6:45 pm | Report abuse |
  14. perryw

    If you approve of this then you might as well move to China, North Korea or Cuba. Less government not more.

    June 13, 2012 at 6:45 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Tom

    Saw a statistic that 3/4 of adults tend to speed on a regular basis, ie. intentionally. Just happens to match the number opposed to using drones for checking speed.

    June 13, 2012 at 6:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • ME

      Of course, because they realize the cost of drones to monitor that much activity far outweighs any benefit. Unlike the "MAKE THEM COMPLY REGARDLESS OF COST" Fascists out there.

      June 13, 2012 at 6:56 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37