Poll: Catching criminals is fine, but don't use drones for speeding tickets, Americans say
The FAA says many universities, companies and government organizations are developing and producing 155 drone designs.
June 13th, 2012
02:30 PM ET

Poll: Catching criminals is fine, but don't use drones for speeding tickets, Americans say

Go ahead and use drones to track down criminals, to combat illegal immigration or for search-and-rescue missions. But to issue traffic citations?

No way, say Americans.

A recent Monmouth University poll showed there was overwhelming support for using unmanned aircraft in a variety of circumstances, but routine police work was not one of them.

Fewer than a quarter of the 1,708 adults surveyed last week said they would OK the use of drones to issue speeding tickets. Sixty-seven percent said they opposed the idea, and 10% had no opinion. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.4 percentage points (view a PDF here).

Compare that with the approval ratings for other drone applications: illegal immigration (64%), rescue missions (80%) and locating criminals (67%). The poll also indicates that 64% of Americans would be concerned about their privacy if U.S. law enforcement agencies began using drones with high-tech cameras.

Under the FAA Modernization and Reform Act, which President Barack Obama signed in February, the Federal Aviation Administration is charged with developing a plan “for the safe integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system as soon as practicable, but not later than September 30, 2015.”

The act is in response to the strict FAA regulations on drone use. It loosens those restrictions, allowing many government agencies to get swifter FAA permission to operate the unmanned aerial vehicles. It also allows any "government public safety agency to operate unmanned aircraft weighing 4.4 pounds or less," if certain criteria are met.

The FAA has authorized drone use for dozens of entities, including more than 20 universities, the U.S. military, local police forces, the FBI, NASA and the U.S. departments of Agriculture, Interior and Energy.

Drone uses vary greatly, according to an FAA document issued in March that outlines how drones will be used in six test ranges.

Not only can their objectives encompass everything from surveillance to searches to air quality testing, they can take many forms. Wingspans range from 6 inches to 240 feet. Weights run the gamut from 4 ounces to 16 tons.

"One thing they have in common is that their numbers and uses are growing dramatically. In the United States alone, approximately 50 companies, universities and government organizations are developing and producing some 155 unmanned aircraft designs,” according to the FAA.

The agency says it will select the test ranges in late 2012, with the first location becoming operational in 2013. The FAA currently has a test site at New Mexico State University, which it’s been using since June 2011.

There have been few incidents with domestic drone use, aside from an accident this month when a $176 million Navy RQ-4A Global Hawk went down in a marsh outside Salisbury, Maryland.

Outside the U.S., however, there has been widespread opposition to American reliance on drones to take out terrorists. A recent Pew Research Center poll showed that the U.S. was the only country among 20 surveyed that approved of using drones to kill extremist leaders in countries such as Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.

Sixty-two percent of Americans approved of the strikes. The only country with an approval rate rivaling the U.S. was Britain with 44% (47% disapproved). Approval ratings for the other 18 countries ranged from 5% in Greece to 38% in Germany.

A separate Pew survey in Pakistan showed equally ardent opposition, with 58% of those surveyed saying the strikes were unnecessary, 58% saying they are conducted without government approval and 93% saying the attacks kill too many innocent people.

In an April letter to the FAA’s acting administrator, Michael Huerta, the chairmen of the Congressional Bipartisan Privacy Caucus said they had numerous concerns about how the drones would be used.

While lauding the benefits of deploying drones in U.S. airspace – including for “spotting wildfires and assessing natural disasters” – Reps. Ed Markey, D-Massachusetts, and Joe Barton, R-Texas, said “there is also the potential for drone technology to enable invasive and pervasive surveillance without adequate privacy protections."

“Many drones are designed to carry surveillance equipment, including video cameras, thermal imagers, radar and wireless network ‘sniffers,’ ” the representatives wrote. “The surveillance power of drones is amplified when the information from on-board sensors is used in conjunction with facial recognition, behavior analysis, license plate recognition or any other system than can identify and track individuals as they go about their daily lives.”

The congressmen closed by asking several questions. Among them: How does the FAA grant temporary licenses? Who has been certified in the past? Have any applications been denied, and if so, why? Is the public notified about where the drones are used? Who operates the drones? What data are collected? How does the FAA plan to make its drone use transparent?

The American Civil Liberties union also chimed in last year, saying that as drones become increasingly cheaper, law enforcement would ramp up its use of the technology, according to the December report, “Protecting Privacy From Aerial Surveillance: Recommendations for Government Use of Drone Aircraft.”

In the report, the watchdog group said drone usage should be limited to instances in which police believe they can collect evidence on a specific crime. If the drone will intrude on someone’s privacy, police should be required to obtain a warrant. There should also be restrictions on storing images of people, the ACLU said.

If the FAA cannot ensure people’s privacy, Congress should take action, the report demanded.

“The deployment of drone technology domestically could easily lead to police fishing expeditions and invasive, all-encompassing surveillance that would seriously erode the privacy that we have always had as Americans,” attorney Catherine Crump, one of the report’s co-authors, said.

In February, as the Senate considered HR 658 (the would-be FAA Modernization and Reform Act), the ACLU warned that Congress was trying to “fast-track domestic drone use” at the expense of Americans’ privacy.

In addition to concerns that unmanned aircraft crash more frequently than their manned counterparts, the ACLU said nothing in HR 658 addresses the “very serious privacy issues.”

“This bill would push the nation willy-nilly toward an era of aerial surveillance without any steps to protect the traditional privacy that Americans have always enjoyed and expected," wrote senior policy analyst Jay Stanley.

“We don’t want to wonder, every time we step out our front door, whether some eye in the sky is watching our every move.”

Overheard on CNN.com: Unmanned drones ignite domestic surveillance debate

Post by:
Filed under: Aviation • Crime • FAA • Politics • Technology • Terrorism • U.S.
soundoff (863 Responses)
  1. STEVE


    June 13, 2012 at 5:09 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Hogwash

    Use drones for inner city drug control, for example. Domestic terrorists terrorize US more than suspected war on terror terrorists do. How many 10s of thousands of US get rayped robbed and killed each year by our fellow Americans?

    June 13, 2012 at 5:10 pm | Report abuse |
  3. JMissal

    Shouldn't have drones above American Citizens at ALL. A Free people do not have a militarized police force patrolling their streets or skies.

    June 13, 2012 at 5:13 pm | Report abuse |
    • Str8Vision

      "A Free people do not have a militarized police force patrolling their streets or skies".......

      Free people don't, but American's lost their freedom under "W" and didn't regain it under Obama. Next thing you know our government will pass a law enabling it to detain citizens indefinitely without due process...oh, wait...lol...never mind.

      June 13, 2012 at 5:24 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Linden Atrocity

    No, No, NO! This aggression will not stand man. Seriously, how stupid can America be? Bragging about their shiny beacon on the hill, and all the nonsense on how we are "free" but yet we allow our government, the very people we elect into office who represent us to difile our freedoms. I am sorry, but I was against spying before and I will always be against spying. When will it end? I don't care if it helps find criminals, because you know it will be used for so much more. The police have enough tools to fight crime, they do NOT need this garbage.

    June 13, 2012 at 5:13 pm | Report abuse |
  5. marigolds

    Funny how people are in an uproar about this, but think that Streetview and Pictometry are neat technological innovations.
    Imagine if the posters here found out about NAIP (where the federal government takes an aerial picture of every backyard in the country every year).

    June 13, 2012 at 5:19 pm | Report abuse |
  6. Cindy

    Well I guess they have to pay for them some way. That would be the Republican way. But what worries me more are the personal drones that people can buy. Understand you can buy them on the internet.

    June 13, 2012 at 5:20 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Jeff Frank (R-Ohio)"Right Wing Insanirty - Up to 5 words succinct"

    Government reads all my blogs

    June 13, 2012 at 5:22 pm | Report abuse |
  8. marigolds

    If you live in a major metro, odds are your city is shelling out a half million dollars a year for lidar, aerial photos, and aerial oblique photos to be flown by airplane.
    They are already taking aerial photos and 3d scans of your back yard.

    With drones, that cost drops down to less than $5k per year for the same data. Either way, it comes out of your pocket as a taxpayer. (Of course, the main use for this data is drawing property lines and addressing roads for 911; but go ahead and worry that it will be used for to catch speeders.)

    June 13, 2012 at 5:23 pm | Report abuse |
  9. Jeff Frank (R-Ohio)"Right Wing Insanirty - Up to 5 words succinct"

    Government reads all my email

    June 13, 2012 at 5:24 pm | Report abuse |
  10. Philip

    So what if you are against the government spying or using drones on you. Yer too late.
    Cal State Berkley developed the Pentium Cube processor years ago. It was the first processor capable of handling digitizing the english language. This technology went straight to the CIA, who have been storing each and every single keystroke made on a PC using Microsoft Windows since 1998. (google microsoft NSA key)

    June 13, 2012 at 5:24 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Redeye Dog

    Using these drones within US borders represent a serious breach of our right to privacy. Allowing it will only lead to greater degradation of our rights, liberties and pursuit of happiness. The question, "Who's watching me now" should not be the first question I ask every morning while I drink my coffee!

    June 13, 2012 at 5:24 pm | Report abuse |
  12. lrt24

    Many states already use manned aircraft to identify speeders – I don't see how a drone is any different.

    June 13, 2012 at 5:24 pm | Report abuse |
  13. Jeff Frank (R-Ohio)"Right Wing Insanirty - Up to 5 words succinct"

    Government taps my cell phone.

    June 13, 2012 at 5:25 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Dale

    These days you see surveillance cameras everywhere streetlights on the corner of buildings you see police helicopters with high-tech cameras, surveillance drones why not they are already equipping them with computers that can lock on individual cell phone tower pings and track anybody they want, today's technology you cannot hide from it so you might as well just accept it. If your a wanted criminal or a drug dealer it is going to suck to be you.

    June 13, 2012 at 5:26 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Alex

    Where is question on drone strikes for DUI texters and cell phone users. I would vote for that.

    June 13, 2012 at 5:27 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37