Jews, Muslims slam German circumcision ruling as assault on religion
A German court has sparked a furor by ruling that religious-based circumcisions are not in a child's best interests.
June 27th, 2012
02:15 PM ET

Jews, Muslims slam German circumcision ruling as assault on religion

Jews and Muslims are joining forces in outrage over a German court's decision that could prohibit parents from having their children circumcised for religious reasons. The court deemed the oft-religious procedure an act of "bodily harm" to children, according to German media reports.

The Tuesday ruling says doctors who perform the procedure for religious reasons could be charged with committing bodily injury, sparking a debate that pits parents' religious freedom against a child's right to self-determination. The court essentially ruled that circumcision is not in a child's best interests, according to the German newspaper Der Spiegel.

"The body of the child is irreparably and permanently changed by a circumcision," the court said. "This change contravenes the interests of the child to decide later on his religious beliefs."

While the ruling is expected to influence other courts, it is not legally binding, Der Spiegel noted.

The procedure, which is relatively common in the United States (roughly six in 10 newborn boys are circumcised), is not so prevalent in Europe. In Germany, only 11% of boys are circumcised, according to 2007 figures. However, many of Germany's 4 million Muslims and its 100,000 Jews consider circumcision a religious rite.

The case began in Cologne in 2010 after a doctor performed a circumcision on a 4-year-old Muslim boy. His parents took him to a hospital two days later because he was bleeding heavily, the Medical Daily website reported. When prosecutors learned of the emergency room visit, they brought criminal charges against the doctor.

A court initially tossed out the charges, saying the parents had consented to the procedure, which constituted a "traditional ritual belonging to the Muslim community," according to Haaretz, an Israeli newspaper. One reason the court cited for defending the procedure was that a child who wasn't circumcised risked being ostracized by his peers, Der Spiegel said.

Prosecutors appealed, and a higher court ruled that circumcisions should be performed only for medical reasons. The court said its decision was for the "good of the child, who would be able to decide for himself which religious community he or she would belong to," Haaretz reported.

While denouncing the procedure, the higher court gave the doctor a pass, acquitting him because he acted in good faith and could reasonably argue he didn't realize he was committing a crime because of Germany's imprecise laws on circumcision, the paper said.

While German doctors "have been operating in a legal gray area," according to Der Spiegel, they have until now been able to cite the law's vagueness in asserting the legality of circumcision. Tuesday's court ruling would deny doctors that out, the newspaper reported.

Within hours of the decision, Jews and Muslims - not just in Germany but from all over the world - banded together to protest what they saw as an assault on their religious freedom.

The New York-based Anti-Defamation League said circumcising newborn males was a "core religious rite of Judaism" and echoed a call by Germany's Central Council of Jews demanding the Bundestag pass legislation protecting the religious practice.

"The decision by a district court in Cologne, Germany, to deem non-medical circumcision a crime places an intolerable burden on the free exercise of religion by Jews and also by Muslims who practice male circumcision as part of their religious faith," Abraham Foxman, the ADL's national director, said in a statement.

While the law did not appear anti-Semitic in its intent, Foxman continued, the ultimate message was clear: "Jews are not welcome."

"Germany has dedicated itself to re-building Jewish life, and the consequences of a ban on circumcision would be a devastating blow to the future of the Jewish community," Foxman wrote.

Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin told Israel Radio that he also felt Germany's parliament should handle the issue legislatively, The Jerusalem Post reported.

“The parliament in Berlin understands the ramifications of the ruling,” Rivlin said. “Not allowing a person to follow his religion opposes every constitution.”

Ali Demir, chairman of the Islamic Religious Community, called circumcision a harmless and "highly symbolic" procedure that had spanned thousands of years. Banning it could have an adverse on Muslims integrating into German society, he told Der Spiegel.

Added Aiman Mayzek of the Central Council of Muslims: "Religious freedom is very important in our constitution and cannot become the pawn of a one-dimensional ruling that also further strengthens existing prejudices and clichés about this issue."

At least one rabbi concurred that education was key to helping people understand the importance of circumcision to Jewish and Islamic cultures.

A "public relations campaign in cooperation with the Muslim community will do away with misunderstandings and will prevent both intentional and unintentional harm to freedom of religion in Europe," Rabbi Menachem Margolin of the Brussels, Belgium-based Rabbinical Center of Europe told Haaretz.

Circumcision entails removing some or all of the foreskin covering the penis. It's most commonly performed on newborn males for religious, personal hygiene or, in some case, preventative health care reasons, according to Medical Daily. The procedure becomes markedly more complicated when performed on older children or adults.

Der Spiegel reported that medical experts advising the Cologne court declared there is no "need in Central Europe to perform circumcisions as part of preventative health care," but the World Health organization begs to differ.

While there are short-term risks to circumcision - bleeding, hematoma and sepsis, among them - there is "substantial evidence" the procedure can help protect against urinary tract infections, syphilis, HIV and chancroid and invasive penile cancer. Male circumcision also increases sexual pleasure for men and women, WHO reports. (report PDF)

Roughly 30% of men in the world have undergone the procedure, and about two in three of those are Muslim. The procedure is routinely performed in Israel, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the U.S. and much of the Middle East, Central Asia and West Africa, according to the organization.

Post by:
Filed under: Courts • Crime • Germany • Health • Islam • Israel • Lawsuit • New York • Religion • World
soundoff (566 Responses)
  1. Kebkeb

    Ah yes, the Germans! Eternal arbiters of the well-being of Semetic children!

    June 28, 2012 at 10:45 am | Report abuse |
  2. Chat

    If jews want to torture their male infants, let them. It is absolutely outrageous that jewish doctors and lobbyists pushed this barbaric practice onto Christian children in the name of "hygiene." Thank God for the Hindu and Chinese doctors immigrating here so we don't have to go to Jewish doctors.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:47 am | Report abuse |
  3. Gerald Fnord

    I can think of no better introduction to life on Earth.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:48 am | Report abuse |
  4. JimAR

    I blame Obama for this.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:49 am | Report abuse |
  5. Dresden BBQ

    Russians did the germans right! !!

    June 28, 2012 at 10:49 am | Report abuse |
  6. Dresden BBQ

    It's the whole tidy whity thing!

    Silly white people.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:50 am | Report abuse |
  7. Gypsy

    Religion makes people do stupid things.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:52 am | Report abuse |
  8. Three3

    Hey, this might be the one thing that unites the Jews and the Muslims!

    June 28, 2012 at 10:53 am | Report abuse |
  9. Cliff

    One Day we shall emerge from the condoning of the mutilation of the baby boys and girls around the Earth.

    June 28, 2012 at 11:03 am | Report abuse |
    • Ryan in Texas

      No braces.

      June 28, 2012 at 11:21 am | Report abuse |
    • Ryan in Texas

      No ear peircing.

      June 28, 2012 at 11:22 am | Report abuse |
    • Ryan in Texas

      No cutting of the umbilical cord.

      June 28, 2012 at 11:22 am | Report abuse |
    • Ryan in Texas

      No "irreversable and painful" immunization shots.

      June 28, 2012 at 11:23 am | Report abuse |
  10. pawnyourhalo

    Religion is irrelevant. You are cutting a baby's genitals for no medically necessary reason, and that's wrong. If there is a religious reason for it, let the person choose it as an informed adult. Giving the child no choice in the matter is not "freedom" of anything.

    June 28, 2012 at 11:05 am | Report abuse |
    • Jennifer

      Agreed. If it's not medically necessary, it's just mutilating your baby. Think. Stop being sheeple. If you want that for your body, fine – you're an adult.

      June 28, 2012 at 11:42 am | Report abuse |
    • Beadlesaz

      Rocket – don't try to reason with a turnip. ;-))

      June 28, 2012 at 11:43 am | Report abuse |
    • Ricky Bobby

      My wiener was too big so it had to be chopped off a bit.

      June 28, 2012 at 11:49 am | Report abuse |
    • real world

      This is the right of the parents of the children there should not be any touching by the state on circomsision it is not usually any more then any medical proceedure dangerous and it has benifits to the children in the long term. i agree with texas this is out of your hands let it be

      June 28, 2012 at 12:37 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Anie

    For anyone who says its needed due to the possibility of deterring STDs, would you condone cutting off the arms of infants due to the possibility of them strangling or shooting someone? That shows you how useless your arguement is. Nothing should ever trump Freedom and Autonomy. Allow children to grow up to adulthood so they can consent to the butchery.

    June 28, 2012 at 11:10 am | Report abuse |
    • Jamjki

      Obviously you're not a guy.

      June 28, 2012 at 11:37 am | Report abuse |
    • rocketscientist

      You're comparing the amputation of a childs arms to the removal of a foreskin? Really?!?!?
      That's simply insane. You do know that, right? If you can't see the difference, get some help. Soon.

      Dr. H

      June 28, 2012 at 11:37 am | Report abuse |
  12. lynn

    I want my tonsils back. My parents assaulted me in the name of better health when I was 5, I protest. What a bunch of idiots inhabit the earth today.

    June 28, 2012 at 11:11 am | Report abuse |
    • rocketscientist

      Good example with the tonsils, Lynn!

      June 28, 2012 at 11:41 am | Report abuse |
    • Beadlesaz

      Lynn – the morons are overrunning the planet.

      June 28, 2012 at 11:44 am | Report abuse |
  13. John

    The picture attached to this article is heartbreaking. It's enough to realize the act is BARBARIC.

    June 28, 2012 at 11:12 am | Report abuse |
    • Jamjki

      Its gay chewing gum.

      June 28, 2012 at 11:38 am | Report abuse |
  14. Jack 63

    They will have the same law on the books in Crazifornia within 5 years.

    June 28, 2012 at 11:25 am | Report abuse |
    • mh

      California WILL have the same law if we are lucky!

      June 28, 2012 at 11:41 am | Report abuse |
  15. lindaluttrell

    Something I never though I'd ever read: "Jews and Muslims are joining forces...banding together."

    June 28, 2012 at 11:26 am | Report abuse |
    • Chgo T

      LOL – AWESOME point!

      June 28, 2012 at 11:39 am | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23