Jews, Muslims slam German circumcision ruling as assault on religion
A German court has sparked a furor by ruling that religious-based circumcisions are not in a child's best interests.
June 27th, 2012
02:15 PM ET

Jews, Muslims slam German circumcision ruling as assault on religion

Jews and Muslims are joining forces in outrage over a German court's decision that could prohibit parents from having their children circumcised for religious reasons. The court deemed the oft-religious procedure an act of "bodily harm" to children, according to German media reports.

The Tuesday ruling says doctors who perform the procedure for religious reasons could be charged with committing bodily injury, sparking a debate that pits parents' religious freedom against a child's right to self-determination. The court essentially ruled that circumcision is not in a child's best interests, according to the German newspaper Der Spiegel.

"The body of the child is irreparably and permanently changed by a circumcision," the court said. "This change contravenes the interests of the child to decide later on his religious beliefs."

While the ruling is expected to influence other courts, it is not legally binding, Der Spiegel noted.

The procedure, which is relatively common in the United States (roughly six in 10 newborn boys are circumcised), is not so prevalent in Europe. In Germany, only 11% of boys are circumcised, according to 2007 figures. However, many of Germany's 4 million Muslims and its 100,000 Jews consider circumcision a religious rite.

The case began in Cologne in 2010 after a doctor performed a circumcision on a 4-year-old Muslim boy. His parents took him to a hospital two days later because he was bleeding heavily, the Medical Daily website reported. When prosecutors learned of the emergency room visit, they brought criminal charges against the doctor.

A court initially tossed out the charges, saying the parents had consented to the procedure, which constituted a "traditional ritual belonging to the Muslim community," according to Haaretz, an Israeli newspaper. One reason the court cited for defending the procedure was that a child who wasn't circumcised risked being ostracized by his peers, Der Spiegel said.

Prosecutors appealed, and a higher court ruled that circumcisions should be performed only for medical reasons. The court said its decision was for the "good of the child, who would be able to decide for himself which religious community he or she would belong to," Haaretz reported.

While denouncing the procedure, the higher court gave the doctor a pass, acquitting him because he acted in good faith and could reasonably argue he didn't realize he was committing a crime because of Germany's imprecise laws on circumcision, the paper said.

While German doctors "have been operating in a legal gray area," according to Der Spiegel, they have until now been able to cite the law's vagueness in asserting the legality of circumcision. Tuesday's court ruling would deny doctors that out, the newspaper reported.

Within hours of the decision, Jews and Muslims - not just in Germany but from all over the world - banded together to protest what they saw as an assault on their religious freedom.

The New York-based Anti-Defamation League said circumcising newborn males was a "core religious rite of Judaism" and echoed a call by Germany's Central Council of Jews demanding the Bundestag pass legislation protecting the religious practice.

"The decision by a district court in Cologne, Germany, to deem non-medical circumcision a crime places an intolerable burden on the free exercise of religion by Jews and also by Muslims who practice male circumcision as part of their religious faith," Abraham Foxman, the ADL's national director, said in a statement.

While the law did not appear anti-Semitic in its intent, Foxman continued, the ultimate message was clear: "Jews are not welcome."

"Germany has dedicated itself to re-building Jewish life, and the consequences of a ban on circumcision would be a devastating blow to the future of the Jewish community," Foxman wrote.

Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin told Israel Radio that he also felt Germany's parliament should handle the issue legislatively, The Jerusalem Post reported.

“The parliament in Berlin understands the ramifications of the ruling,” Rivlin said. “Not allowing a person to follow his religion opposes every constitution.”

Ali Demir, chairman of the Islamic Religious Community, called circumcision a harmless and "highly symbolic" procedure that had spanned thousands of years. Banning it could have an adverse on Muslims integrating into German society, he told Der Spiegel.

Added Aiman Mayzek of the Central Council of Muslims: "Religious freedom is very important in our constitution and cannot become the pawn of a one-dimensional ruling that also further strengthens existing prejudices and clichés about this issue."

At least one rabbi concurred that education was key to helping people understand the importance of circumcision to Jewish and Islamic cultures.

A "public relations campaign in cooperation with the Muslim community will do away with misunderstandings and will prevent both intentional and unintentional harm to freedom of religion in Europe," Rabbi Menachem Margolin of the Brussels, Belgium-based Rabbinical Center of Europe told Haaretz.

Circumcision entails removing some or all of the foreskin covering the penis. It's most commonly performed on newborn males for religious, personal hygiene or, in some case, preventative health care reasons, according to Medical Daily. The procedure becomes markedly more complicated when performed on older children or adults.

Der Spiegel reported that medical experts advising the Cologne court declared there is no "need in Central Europe to perform circumcisions as part of preventative health care," but the World Health organization begs to differ.

While there are short-term risks to circumcision - bleeding, hematoma and sepsis, among them - there is "substantial evidence" the procedure can help protect against urinary tract infections, syphilis, HIV and chancroid and invasive penile cancer. Male circumcision also increases sexual pleasure for men and women, WHO reports. (report PDF)

Roughly 30% of men in the world have undergone the procedure, and about two in three of those are Muslim. The procedure is routinely performed in Israel, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the U.S. and much of the Middle East, Central Asia and West Africa, according to the organization.

Post by:
Filed under: Courts • Crime • Germany • Health • Islam • Israel • Lawsuit • New York • Religion • World
soundoff (566 Responses)
  1. Randino

    Religious rite? Fine. Let it happen at the child's bar mitzvah when he can make the choice himself.

    June 28, 2012 at 1:56 pm | Report abuse |
    • VR13

      Randino, have you realized that many religions, and for that matter many societies, are not about "individual rights." Humanity wouldn't have survived if it was about the benefits of the individual instead of the benefits and believes of the community. Besides, at they age of just several days old, you don't expect the child to make a decision, nor do you even pretend to give a child the right to do so. So, yes the parents should be able to educate and raise their children according to their own believes.

      June 28, 2012 at 2:49 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Liz in Seattle

    My God what is that photograph?? That poor child, being featured on a national news page in such a humiliating position. His parents should be ashamed.

    June 28, 2012 at 1:59 pm | Report abuse |
    • Cheryl

      Not to mention he is a lot older than 8 days!

      June 28, 2012 at 2:26 pm | Report abuse |
  3. UniteEarthOrder

    The Temple of Female Unification requires abortions. Not much different from the above news article.

    June 28, 2012 at 2:01 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Bootyfunk

    used to have a different opinion on circ.umcision. now i realize it's cutting of a piece of the body. completely unnecessary genital mutilation. we rail middle eastern practices of female circ.umcision, but we perform male circ.umcisions without a thought. i want my foreskin back.

    June 28, 2012 at 2:07 pm | Report abuse |
    • VR13

      By definition, most religious traditions are not necessary. That's what makes them religious traditions instead of just common acts.

      June 28, 2012 at 2:51 pm | Report abuse |
  5. ncmyk

    FINALLY! we have something that brings jews and muslims together!

    June 28, 2012 at 2:24 pm | Report abuse |

    An examination of Jews through the millenia clears it up: it's not genital mutilation and the haters of it have always been among the most evil people in the world.

    June 28, 2012 at 2:28 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Patrick

    Great news to hear that a major nation's government has stepped up against this practice.

    June 28, 2012 at 2:29 pm | Report abuse |
  8. Rick

    I wasn't crazy about it at the time, but I'm glad my parents made me get one. It looks a lot nicer I think without all that foreskin. Would I have it done to myself if I had the choice? Heck no, it hurts for weeks!

    June 28, 2012 at 2:35 pm | Report abuse |
    • bob jones

      I like mine uncut- it's has slack to grow into:)

      June 28, 2012 at 2:55 pm | Report abuse |
  9. Evangenital

    I totally agree with the law.

    June 28, 2012 at 2:41 pm | Report abuse |
  10. Greg

    Just testing to see if my comment gets posted. I tried to post a longer comment earlier, but I don't see it up. This message board is not set up well at all.

    June 28, 2012 at 2:41 pm | Report abuse |
    • su3385

      You're right, the cnn website sucks! I've been complaining for months and now CNN Tech admits there is a problem and they don't know how to fix it. Either comments don't post, or no box opens in which to put a comment, even if you are logged in. That's ok FOX CBS NBC & ABC work just fine.

      June 28, 2012 at 3:10 pm | Report abuse |
  11. saneCanadian

    about time this child abuse was ended

    June 28, 2012 at 2:52 pm | Report abuse |
  12. Steven Colo

    Germany again... *sigh*

    June 28, 2012 at 2:54 pm | Report abuse |
  13. hecep

    Honestly, I don't see how guys could walk around WITHOUT a foreskin. It's there to protect a sensitive area.

    June 28, 2012 at 2:54 pm | Report abuse |
    • worldlypatriotusaveteran

      That's right. The "creator," whoever, or whatever that might be, or evolution (if you're non-religious) put the foreskin there, for a specific purpose. It protects a very sensitive area of the body.

      A child's right to decide, after he becomes an adult, trumps any religious ceremony or right. Wake up, people, this is the 21st Century.

      For the record, I still have my foreskin, and I'm very happy about it!

      June 28, 2012 at 3:23 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son.

      Correct. Well that was correct when we lived in caves. Personally I wear clothing.

      June 29, 2012 at 8:14 am | Report abuse |
  14. RJX

    Jews are some of the smartest, most accomplished people on Earth. Rabbi Moses Maimonides said the purpose of cutting was to reduce pleasure for both the man and woman, so he would be a brother to other men first and a husband second.

    My people are too smart for me to accept this kind of ignorance from them. We should know by now that old traditions like patriarchy are manifestations of raw evolutionary psychology and rarely the result of G-d's will or civilized thought. Yes, let a clergy member near your kid's junk. Always a good idea, especially if he says you're obligated. No. The older the tradition, the worse it is.

    June 28, 2012 at 2:55 pm | Report abuse |
  15. realoldpatriot

    But what's this going to do to my taxes? What about my taxes? Doesn't anybody care about my taxes?

    June 28, 2012 at 2:56 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23