Jews, Muslims slam German circumcision ruling as assault on religion
A German court has sparked a furor by ruling that religious-based circumcisions are not in a child's best interests.
June 27th, 2012
02:15 PM ET

Jews, Muslims slam German circumcision ruling as assault on religion

Jews and Muslims are joining forces in outrage over a German court's decision that could prohibit parents from having their children circumcised for religious reasons. The court deemed the oft-religious procedure an act of "bodily harm" to children, according to German media reports.

The Tuesday ruling says doctors who perform the procedure for religious reasons could be charged with committing bodily injury, sparking a debate that pits parents' religious freedom against a child's right to self-determination. The court essentially ruled that circumcision is not in a child's best interests, according to the German newspaper Der Spiegel.

"The body of the child is irreparably and permanently changed by a circumcision," the court said. "This change contravenes the interests of the child to decide later on his religious beliefs."

While the ruling is expected to influence other courts, it is not legally binding, Der Spiegel noted.

The procedure, which is relatively common in the United States (roughly six in 10 newborn boys are circumcised), is not so prevalent in Europe. In Germany, only 11% of boys are circumcised, according to 2007 figures. However, many of Germany's 4 million Muslims and its 100,000 Jews consider circumcision a religious rite.

The case began in Cologne in 2010 after a doctor performed a circumcision on a 4-year-old Muslim boy. His parents took him to a hospital two days later because he was bleeding heavily, the Medical Daily website reported. When prosecutors learned of the emergency room visit, they brought criminal charges against the doctor.

A court initially tossed out the charges, saying the parents had consented to the procedure, which constituted a "traditional ritual belonging to the Muslim community," according to Haaretz, an Israeli newspaper. One reason the court cited for defending the procedure was that a child who wasn't circumcised risked being ostracized by his peers, Der Spiegel said.

Prosecutors appealed, and a higher court ruled that circumcisions should be performed only for medical reasons. The court said its decision was for the "good of the child, who would be able to decide for himself which religious community he or she would belong to," Haaretz reported.

While denouncing the procedure, the higher court gave the doctor a pass, acquitting him because he acted in good faith and could reasonably argue he didn't realize he was committing a crime because of Germany's imprecise laws on circumcision, the paper said.

While German doctors "have been operating in a legal gray area," according to Der Spiegel, they have until now been able to cite the law's vagueness in asserting the legality of circumcision. Tuesday's court ruling would deny doctors that out, the newspaper reported.

Within hours of the decision, Jews and Muslims - not just in Germany but from all over the world - banded together to protest what they saw as an assault on their religious freedom.

The New York-based Anti-Defamation League said circumcising newborn males was a "core religious rite of Judaism" and echoed a call by Germany's Central Council of Jews demanding the Bundestag pass legislation protecting the religious practice.

"The decision by a district court in Cologne, Germany, to deem non-medical circumcision a crime places an intolerable burden on the free exercise of religion by Jews and also by Muslims who practice male circumcision as part of their religious faith," Abraham Foxman, the ADL's national director, said in a statement.

While the law did not appear anti-Semitic in its intent, Foxman continued, the ultimate message was clear: "Jews are not welcome."

"Germany has dedicated itself to re-building Jewish life, and the consequences of a ban on circumcision would be a devastating blow to the future of the Jewish community," Foxman wrote.

Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin told Israel Radio that he also felt Germany's parliament should handle the issue legislatively, The Jerusalem Post reported.

“The parliament in Berlin understands the ramifications of the ruling,” Rivlin said. “Not allowing a person to follow his religion opposes every constitution.”

Ali Demir, chairman of the Islamic Religious Community, called circumcision a harmless and "highly symbolic" procedure that had spanned thousands of years. Banning it could have an adverse on Muslims integrating into German society, he told Der Spiegel.

Added Aiman Mayzek of the Central Council of Muslims: "Religious freedom is very important in our constitution and cannot become the pawn of a one-dimensional ruling that also further strengthens existing prejudices and clichés about this issue."

At least one rabbi concurred that education was key to helping people understand the importance of circumcision to Jewish and Islamic cultures.

A "public relations campaign in cooperation with the Muslim community will do away with misunderstandings and will prevent both intentional and unintentional harm to freedom of religion in Europe," Rabbi Menachem Margolin of the Brussels, Belgium-based Rabbinical Center of Europe told Haaretz.

Circumcision entails removing some or all of the foreskin covering the penis. It's most commonly performed on newborn males for religious, personal hygiene or, in some case, preventative health care reasons, according to Medical Daily. The procedure becomes markedly more complicated when performed on older children or adults.

Der Spiegel reported that medical experts advising the Cologne court declared there is no "need in Central Europe to perform circumcisions as part of preventative health care," but the World Health organization begs to differ.

While there are short-term risks to circumcision - bleeding, hematoma and sepsis, among them - there is "substantial evidence" the procedure can help protect against urinary tract infections, syphilis, HIV and chancroid and invasive penile cancer. Male circumcision also increases sexual pleasure for men and women, WHO reports. (report PDF)

Roughly 30% of men in the world have undergone the procedure, and about two in three of those are Muslim. The procedure is routinely performed in Israel, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the U.S. and much of the Middle East, Central Asia and West Africa, according to the organization.

Post by:
Filed under: Courts • Crime • Germany • Health • Islam • Israel • Lawsuit • New York • Religion • World
soundoff (566 Responses)
  1. hecep

    Is that a shoebox, or are you just happy to see me?

    June 28, 2012 at 2:57 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Gary

    As usual, too many attorneys with not enough to do, stirring up trouble.

    June 28, 2012 at 3:01 pm | Report abuse |
  3. peick

    Today in Germany, tomorrow in the US. Don't back down to government infringement on your religious liberty.

    June 28, 2012 at 3:02 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Dunlar

    The W.H.O. disagrees.

    June 28, 2012 at 3:04 pm | Report abuse |
  5. jay

    I think this article and those posting on it (with the exception of myself) is just NUTS!

    June 28, 2012 at 3:18 pm | Report abuse |
  6. xeno

    This picture is so disturbing. How can anyone look at that and not think "Yeah, this is messed up and wrong." If what was occurring wasn't for "religious purposes," someone would end up in jail. So, it's time to move on from this "tradition" of child abuse.

    June 28, 2012 at 3:19 pm | Report abuse |
  7. CMS

    100% agree with the law, I could smake my parents for doing that to me!

    June 28, 2012 at 3:22 pm | Report abuse |
  8. CMS

    100% agree with the law, I could smack my parents for doing that to me!

    June 28, 2012 at 3:23 pm | Report abuse |
  9. southernwonder

    take religion out of bedroom, living room, bathroom, kitchen, schools and hospitals.

    June 28, 2012 at 3:32 pm | Report abuse |
    • Lanfear

      Gonna have to remove it altogether.

      June 28, 2012 at 4:40 pm | Report abuse |
    • irbsod

      What should be next is parents who pierce their kids ears. At least muslims and jews have a religious excuse for their mutilation. Parents of 1 year olds that poke holes in the kids ears so they can dangle jewelry do it for the parents vanity.

      June 28, 2012 at 5:19 pm | Report abuse |
    • Guest

      Schools and hospitals fine. As for the rest, what folks bring into their own homes is their business, not yours.

      June 29, 2012 at 12:44 am | Report abuse |
  10. The Dude

    A common practice with jeews is suking the blood (with their mouth) from a freshly circimcised wee wee. Look it up. I am not a liar.

    June 28, 2012 at 3:40 pm | Report abuse |
    • Erik

      You're bloody joking

      June 28, 2012 at 4:42 pm | Report abuse |
    • dao

      Only in the ultra orthodox, which is even now curtailed.

      June 28, 2012 at 4:50 pm | Report abuse |
    • dao

      It was an ancient part of the ritual whose purpose was to staunch any bleeding. Again, it is no longer in common practice in the majority of Judaism.

      June 28, 2012 at 4:55 pm | Report abuse |
    • Dan

      That is called the Sandusky maneuver.

      June 28, 2012 at 5:04 pm | Report abuse |
    • wook

      Weird people.

      June 28, 2012 at 5:09 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Michele

    I don't believe that religious tradition or cultural tradition is any reason to allow permanent damage to be done to children, male or female. If the adult man or adult woman wants to make an informed decision to allow such a procedure, he or she should have every right. But I don't think anyone should have the right to make take the decision away from the future adult unless there is a compelling and serious health issue at stake. If the female labia and male foreskin were not serving a useful purpose, then over time evolution would do away with them. Until then, leave well enough alone.

    June 28, 2012 at 3:48 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son.

      >I don't believe that religious tradition or cultural tradition is any reason to allow permanent damage to be done to children>

      Agreed. However that is not what happening here. IN fact polls show most medical professionals recommend this procedure. If nothing else it is hygienically superior. If is was ‘harm’ it would have been illegal to start with.

      P.s. I’m an atheist.

      June 28, 2012 at 4:24 pm | Report abuse |
  12. JLatham

    This is anti-semitism masquarading as a concern for public health. Nothing more, nothing less.

    June 28, 2012 at 4:09 pm | Report abuse |
    • Holy Frijoles

      Agreed!!!

      June 28, 2012 at 4:20 pm | Report abuse |
  13. ReaganDem

    The rights of the individual is trumped by the traditions of culture which insists that everyone must fit in.

    June 28, 2012 at 4:53 pm | Report abuse |
  14. paullubbock

    So how did the Muslim and Jewish community do it before Dr.'s..., so what has changed? Slay away at your children your freedoms haven't changed other than now your religion is responsible for the act not the public medical community.

    June 28, 2012 at 5:00 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Dan

    Another failure for religion.

    June 28, 2012 at 5:05 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23