Jews, Muslims slam German circumcision ruling as assault on religion
A German court has sparked a furor by ruling that religious-based circumcisions are not in a child's best interests.
June 27th, 2012
02:15 PM ET

Jews, Muslims slam German circumcision ruling as assault on religion

Jews and Muslims are joining forces in outrage over a German court's decision that could prohibit parents from having their children circumcised for religious reasons. The court deemed the oft-religious procedure an act of "bodily harm" to children, according to German media reports.

The Tuesday ruling says doctors who perform the procedure for religious reasons could be charged with committing bodily injury, sparking a debate that pits parents' religious freedom against a child's right to self-determination. The court essentially ruled that circumcision is not in a child's best interests, according to the German newspaper Der Spiegel.

"The body of the child is irreparably and permanently changed by a circumcision," the court said. "This change contravenes the interests of the child to decide later on his religious beliefs."

While the ruling is expected to influence other courts, it is not legally binding, Der Spiegel noted.

The procedure, which is relatively common in the United States (roughly six in 10 newborn boys are circumcised), is not so prevalent in Europe. In Germany, only 11% of boys are circumcised, according to 2007 figures. However, many of Germany's 4 million Muslims and its 100,000 Jews consider circumcision a religious rite.

The case began in Cologne in 2010 after a doctor performed a circumcision on a 4-year-old Muslim boy. His parents took him to a hospital two days later because he was bleeding heavily, the Medical Daily website reported. When prosecutors learned of the emergency room visit, they brought criminal charges against the doctor.

A court initially tossed out the charges, saying the parents had consented to the procedure, which constituted a "traditional ritual belonging to the Muslim community," according to Haaretz, an Israeli newspaper. One reason the court cited for defending the procedure was that a child who wasn't circumcised risked being ostracized by his peers, Der Spiegel said.

Prosecutors appealed, and a higher court ruled that circumcisions should be performed only for medical reasons. The court said its decision was for the "good of the child, who would be able to decide for himself which religious community he or she would belong to," Haaretz reported.

While denouncing the procedure, the higher court gave the doctor a pass, acquitting him because he acted in good faith and could reasonably argue he didn't realize he was committing a crime because of Germany's imprecise laws on circumcision, the paper said.

While German doctors "have been operating in a legal gray area," according to Der Spiegel, they have until now been able to cite the law's vagueness in asserting the legality of circumcision. Tuesday's court ruling would deny doctors that out, the newspaper reported.

Within hours of the decision, Jews and Muslims - not just in Germany but from all over the world - banded together to protest what they saw as an assault on their religious freedom.

The New York-based Anti-Defamation League said circumcising newborn males was a "core religious rite of Judaism" and echoed a call by Germany's Central Council of Jews demanding the Bundestag pass legislation protecting the religious practice.

"The decision by a district court in Cologne, Germany, to deem non-medical circumcision a crime places an intolerable burden on the free exercise of religion by Jews and also by Muslims who practice male circumcision as part of their religious faith," Abraham Foxman, the ADL's national director, said in a statement.

While the law did not appear anti-Semitic in its intent, Foxman continued, the ultimate message was clear: "Jews are not welcome."

"Germany has dedicated itself to re-building Jewish life, and the consequences of a ban on circumcision would be a devastating blow to the future of the Jewish community," Foxman wrote.

Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin told Israel Radio that he also felt Germany's parliament should handle the issue legislatively, The Jerusalem Post reported.

“The parliament in Berlin understands the ramifications of the ruling,” Rivlin said. “Not allowing a person to follow his religion opposes every constitution.”

Ali Demir, chairman of the Islamic Religious Community, called circumcision a harmless and "highly symbolic" procedure that had spanned thousands of years. Banning it could have an adverse on Muslims integrating into German society, he told Der Spiegel.

Added Aiman Mayzek of the Central Council of Muslims: "Religious freedom is very important in our constitution and cannot become the pawn of a one-dimensional ruling that also further strengthens existing prejudices and clichés about this issue."

At least one rabbi concurred that education was key to helping people understand the importance of circumcision to Jewish and Islamic cultures.

A "public relations campaign in cooperation with the Muslim community will do away with misunderstandings and will prevent both intentional and unintentional harm to freedom of religion in Europe," Rabbi Menachem Margolin of the Brussels, Belgium-based Rabbinical Center of Europe told Haaretz.

Circumcision entails removing some or all of the foreskin covering the penis. It's most commonly performed on newborn males for religious, personal hygiene or, in some case, preventative health care reasons, according to Medical Daily. The procedure becomes markedly more complicated when performed on older children or adults.

Der Spiegel reported that medical experts advising the Cologne court declared there is no "need in Central Europe to perform circumcisions as part of preventative health care," but the World Health organization begs to differ.

While there are short-term risks to circumcision - bleeding, hematoma and sepsis, among them - there is "substantial evidence" the procedure can help protect against urinary tract infections, syphilis, HIV and chancroid and invasive penile cancer. Male circumcision also increases sexual pleasure for men and women, WHO reports. (report PDF)

Roughly 30% of men in the world have undergone the procedure, and about two in three of those are Muslim. The procedure is routinely performed in Israel, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the U.S. and much of the Middle East, Central Asia and West Africa, according to the organization.

Post by:
Filed under: Courts • Crime • Germany • Health • Islam • Israel • Lawsuit • New York • Religion • World
soundoff (566 Responses)
  1. daveinil

    I hear Secretary Sebilius has the first draft of this new rule ready to go if Obamacare is upheld.

    June 27, 2012 at 9:36 pm | Report abuse |
    • Matt

      Wouldn't surprise me.

      June 27, 2012 at 9:44 pm | Report abuse |
  2. LMAO

    Hint: the (conspiracy theory) part of the address says it all...lmao!

    June 27, 2012 at 9:37 pm | Report abuse |
  3. Sheila M.

    Eeeeww. Take that extra, bacteria collecting helmet. Please!!! Screw religion. How's about cleanliness. Those things go into us girls, and personally like them to be as bacteria free as possible. The Jews had this one one dead on.

    June 27, 2012 at 9:37 pm | Report abuse |
    • dastreagus

      ooh sure, how about we take your hood.

      June 27, 2012 at 9:46 pm | Report abuse |
    • Bob

      Moron – I would never date you.

      June 27, 2012 at 9:57 pm | Report abuse |
    • embek

      Um, Sheila, ever hear of soap and water? same way women get all of their "bacteria-collecting" skin folds clean.

      June 27, 2012 at 10:53 pm | Report abuse |
    • DasWasser

      Biologist you certainly are not. How about a compromise? Males get to determine their own destiny and you can please yourself with a candlestick. The world would be much better off if you kind didn't reproduce.

      June 27, 2012 at 11:31 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Scott

    ONLY the follower of the "Religion of Peace" do this to terrorize older boys as shown in this photo.

    Scott

    June 27, 2012 at 9:37 pm | Report abuse |
  5. Loki

    Why do Jews like to touch little boys junk ? Seems like a rather odd custom don't you think ?

    June 27, 2012 at 9:38 pm | Report abuse |
    • billy the big bone

      you get it a little twisted - i think catholic priest are doing most of the touch of boys junk.

      June 27, 2012 at 9:51 pm | Report abuse |
    • Steve

      It goes back to Abraham to show as a witness to all in that time and that which followed that Arabs and Jews are brothers. A sactified people. For no other human grouping did it.

      June 27, 2012 at 10:01 pm | Report abuse |
  6. Sheila M.

    Funny, dude.

    June 27, 2012 at 9:38 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Sheila M.

    What the hell does this have to do with socialism. Are you F-ing paranoid. I wanna kill babies as part of my religion. If they stop me, are they socialist? Go to Fox News where your rants are appreciated. You sound like an idiot to us.

    June 27, 2012 at 9:41 pm | Report abuse |
  8. dastreagus

    I forgive you witches for taking my foreskin. It was the desert and you thought you heard the voice of god because you were starving and dehydrated. been there. I forgive every witch of both of the idiot religions. "god" bless you.

    June 27, 2012 at 9:41 pm | Report abuse |
    • dastreagus

      maybe you can make it up to me by giving me everything you own, and getting in a line. you monsters.

      June 27, 2012 at 9:43 pm | Report abuse |
    • LMAO

      Here's a piece of skin that peeled of my shoulder. Glue it back, and quit whining.

      June 27, 2012 at 9:47 pm | Report abuse |
  9. asifyoucould

    Why are religious people such idiots? Must be necessary for recruitment

    June 27, 2012 at 9:41 pm | Report abuse |
  10. LMAO

    Has that shoe box been sterilized?

    June 27, 2012 at 9:44 pm | Report abuse |
  11. dastreagus

    That's it. no more nothin. no church, no family, you are all jews.

    June 27, 2012 at 9:44 pm | Report abuse |
  12. BobT

    Anyone remember the young African girl a few years ago that fled her country to avoid ritual mutilation? It was widely decried as barbaric mutilation by a backward, uneducated tribe. What's the difference here? Is it that the child is too young to defend itself? Or do those who believe this is a religious rite believe they need to correct a mistake their God made in the design of the male body? All involuntary mutilation should be outlawed!

    June 27, 2012 at 9:44 pm | Report abuse |
    • Lee

      The difference Bob is simple. It's ok to mutilate a boy but not a girl.

      June 27, 2012 at 9:46 pm | Report abuse |
  13. Loggie

    Hasa Diga Eebowai!!

    June 27, 2012 at 9:44 pm | Report abuse |
  14. dastreagus

    This issue really makes me upset. I need to relax.

    June 27, 2012 at 9:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • JOE

      cut, cut,cut ouch

      June 27, 2012 at 9:56 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Elana

    I commend Germany actually for not being intimidated BY their history with the Jews, and doing something that thinks about the greater good, not appeasing a ridiculous tradition. If it was tradition in a cult to cut off the pinky finger of all baby girls, would that be okay? NO. Why not? You don't NEED your pinky, and the babies are so young they don't remember it, right? Just because it is OLD, doesn't mean it is right to cut off a innocent baby's foreskin!

    June 27, 2012 at 9:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • dastreagus

      listen to the president.. It was Polish history. hahahahahaha

      June 27, 2012 at 9:50 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23