NFL: Refs missed penalty in controversial play, but Seattle victory stands
September 25th, 2012
06:00 PM ET

NFL: Refs missed penalty in controversial play, but Seattle victory stands

Replacement referees missed a penalty that would have rendered moot a controversy over whether a Seattle Seahawks receiver caught a game-winning touchdown pass a moment later, the National Football League said Tuesday.

The Green Bay Packers would have won the game had offensive pass interference been called against Seahawks receiver Golden Tate, but the missed penalty wasn't reviewable. So the officials' controversial on-field ruling that Tate subsequently scored a touchdown by having joint possession of the ball with a Packers defender stands.

The touchdown - which over the last day has become a symbol of player and fan frustration over the NFL's replacement referees - gave Seattle a 14-12 win. "The result of the game is final," the NFL said in a news release Tuesday.

Photos: Blown calls

The NFL also said that it supports a referee's decision, after he reviewed the play Monday night, that no indisputable evidence existed to overturn the on-field ruling that Tate scored.

Commentators on ESPN, which showed the "Monday Night Football" game, questioned whether Tate really caught the ball, penalty or not. The play has sparked a full-open revolt by fans and players over replacement referees, who are standing in for officials that the NFL has locked out during a labor dispute.

"Fine me and use the money to pay the regular refs," Packers guard T.J. Lang tweeted minutes after the game ended, one in a series of profanity-laced tweets accusing the referees of taking the game from his team.

Here's how the play unfolded: With seconds remaining and Seattle down 12-7, Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson threw a deep pass into the end zone. Tate and Packers safety M.D. Jennings went up for the ball, and referees eventually ruled - after officials gave competing signals - that both possessed the ball simultaneously. Under NFL rules, simultaneous possession goes to the offense, so the officials ruled the play a touchdown for Tate with time expired.

Replays, however, showed two potential problems: First, Tate appears to shove Packers defender Sam Shields in the back while the ball is in the air, a move that normally would draw an offensive pass interference penalty. Second, the footage appears to show Jennings first having both arms wrapped around the ball while Tate had one arm on it, so simultaneous possession appears questionable. The ball eventually was pulled tight to Jennings' chest.

The referees reviewed the play, and let it stand, giving Seattle the win.

The NFL essentially said Tuesday that the Packers should have won because Tate should have been called for offensive pass interference, "which would have ended the game" with the Packers ahead.

However, a missed offensive pass interference call is not reviewable, the NFL said, so nothing could be done about that part of the play when it was reviewed by referee Wayne Elliott.

As for the ruling on the catch, the NFL said: "Eliott determined that no indisputable visual evidence existed to overturn the call on the field, and as a result, the on-field ruling of touchdown stood."

"The NFL Officiating Department reviewed the video today and supports the decision not to overturn the on-field ruling following the instant replay review," the NFL said Tuesday.

Discussion of the call virtually took over Twitter in the United States and sparked rising calls for the NFL to quickly settle its labor dispute with officials.

Packers coach Mike McCarthy declined to specifically address the call in his post-game news conference but said later that he had "never seen anything like that in all my years in football."

See the play in photos | Week 3: Photos

Green Bay quarterback Aaron Rodgers called the officiating "awful."

Coming away with a close win, Seahawks coach Pete Carroll was less critical.

"From what I understand from the officials, it was a simultaneous catch, that's how they called it," Carroll told reporters. "Tag goes to the runner. Good call."

But he said it's sill time for the dispute to end.

"It's a very, very complex process to handle these games and make the decisions, and there's nothing easy about it," he said. "And it takes years and years of experience to pull it off properly and in a timely fashion and to keep the flow of the game alive and all of that, and it's just time for it to be over."

"The league deserves it," Carroll said. "Everybody deserves it."

Controversy over the replacement officials has been simmering since the preseason. A series of missed or muffed calls has riled coaches, players and fans.

On Thursday, the NFL Players Association sent a letter to league owners saying the decision to hire replacement referees "has led to a deteriorating of order, safety and integrity."

"This affirmative decision has not only resulted in poor calls, missed calls and bad game management, but the combination of those deficiencies will only continue to jeopardize player health and safety and the integrity of the game that has taken decades to build," the union wrote.

It's also affecting gamblers. Betters lost an estimated $150 million on the call, gambling expert R.J. Bell said on the gaming website

Bell also writes that home crowds seem to be influencing officials and that scoring is up from Las Vegas expectations.

The outcry for a resolution appeared to be growing after the Monday night game.

On Tuesday, the website, which tracks officiating in the NFL, said the Monday night call was "beyond the tipping point, this is the drowning point."

New Jersey Senate President Steve Sweeney got into the game on Tuesday, saying he would introduce legislation against holding sporting events officiated by replacement referees.

"This past weekend in the NFL has not only made a mockery of a great sport, but shined a very bright light on how important fully trained and professional officiating is to player safety," Sweeney said in a statement released by his office Tuesday morning. "We wouldn't allow a factory or construction site to operate without fully trained supervisors on hand to ensure the safety of employees. Why should we do anything differently when the job site is a playing field?"

Discussion of the game also accounted for at least four of the top 10 topics on Twitter in the United States, where everyday fans and celebrities appeared united in their frustration. Even President Obama weighed in on the issue.


Does this ruin football for you? Share your commentary with CNN iReport.


Stephen A. Smith, never one to keep his opinion close to the vest, let it fly on Twitter throughout the end of the game.




According to Sports Illustrated's Peter King, the two sides in the labor dispute are about $3.3 million apart.

Here's a look at some more of the reaction on Twitter:




That last one might not be an official account.

Regarding the NFL's labor dispute with its regular officials, sticking points include salary issues and changes to the officials' retirement program.

What do you think of the final play, of the game or of the replacement officials?

Click here for the best photos from Week 3 of the NFL season.

soundoff (2,120 Responses)
  1. Reload

    This uproar is all driven by labor unions. The networks are pandering to them on behalf of the Ref's union. The real guys get it wrong too. However, the coaches just can't say anything without getting fined to hell and back.

    September 25, 2012 at 5:47 pm | Report abuse |
  2. kenredbar

    It appears the Refs had other commitments and needed to end the game. Goodell says good job with wrong call and the results remain the same make it up for it next game. Thank you, my ego is intact.

    September 25, 2012 at 5:47 pm | Report abuse |
  3. Aud

    Boy, I feel bad for the replacement refs, I bet they're sweating bullets each time they enter the field.

    September 25, 2012 at 5:49 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Questionable call? Maybe, deliberate call!

    Does the name Blacksox suggest anything? 1919?
    Obviously, this is rank speculation, but you can't help but wonder.

    September 25, 2012 at 5:49 pm | Report abuse |
  5. dowdotica

    skaaaaaaaa-rew job! thats 2 games in a row i watched that the reffin' sukt!!! pretty pathetic. i don't much care for footsball but i could do a better job blin' folded!!

    September 25, 2012 at 5:49 pm | Report abuse |
  6. Michigan

    That play should have been a interfearence not a touchdown it's obvious if y'all got the president on this y'all need to think twice it wasn't daul possession and imma Greenbay fan that wasn't fair either their blind or they are playing favorites y'all need to get it together nfl seriously.!!!!!!!!!

    September 25, 2012 at 5:49 pm | Report abuse |
    • mb

      fo shizzle.

      September 25, 2012 at 5:53 pm | Report abuse |
  7. barbara451

    for all the republicans – it was Obama's fault

    September 25, 2012 at 5:49 pm | Report abuse |
  8. z

    earlier in the 4th quarter there was a pass interference call on the seahawks that was bogus. seatle would have gotten the ball back and who knows what wouldve happened. I say the better team won.

    September 25, 2012 at 5:50 pm | Report abuse |
  9. dowdotica

    while bad calls are always a part of a sport, obvious bad calls? give me a break! get some glasses. hey maybe those cats are bein bought!

    September 25, 2012 at 5:51 pm | Report abuse |
    • lovehandles

      brilliant point, these loser ref's can't make it in any division so why not get some pay offs while they can....can't blame them for that...get it while they are employed, there is some huge money on each game in the NFL. I bet no one is looking at the possibility of some mega payoffs for these guys/gals.

      September 25, 2012 at 9:18 pm | Report abuse |
  10. kenredbar

    I doesn't matter who had possession the ball. An offensive penalty should have been called pushing off thus ending the game.

    September 25, 2012 at 5:51 pm | Report abuse |
    • KeyserSoze

      The dispute was about the TD call not the pass interference. You cannot go to court for a case and change it to another one during the trial. The TD was legal. Seahawks win.

      September 25, 2012 at 6:07 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Charles Schwabe

    You what defies logic. Humans made the call but other humans say a mistake can't be corrected. Why can't a mistake be corrected? What is the logic? If the NFL admits there was an error made by people...then the people in charge can correct the error. The reason there is no correction is that the NFL just does not want any further controversy added to the already devastating fire.

    September 25, 2012 at 5:54 pm | Report abuse |
  12. Mark

    /The "regular" official miss calls all the time. What's the problem?

    September 25, 2012 at 5:57 pm | Report abuse |
  13. Raiders4Ever

    Felt bad for the Pack but even the "regular refs" get it wrong. Welcome to Oakland, land of the "Tuck" rule and the "Immaculate Reception". Use replay to get it write of take it away & chalk it up to human error.

    September 25, 2012 at 5:58 pm | Report abuse |
  14. 4ttoys

    I know it's a small gesture but I refuse to watch all NFL games until the replacement ref's are gone and the real ref's are back on the field. I have lot's of things competeing for my Sunday afternoons, now I just have one less.

    September 25, 2012 at 5:58 pm | Report abuse |
  15. sam

    The only reason the NFL still exists is for Fantasy Football. No one cares who actually wins so long as their players get a few yards.

    September 25, 2012 at 5:59 pm | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87