Live blog: Clinton testifies before Senate on Benghazi attack
Secretary of State Clinton appears before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday.
January 23rd, 2013
12:13 PM ET

Live blog: Clinton testifies before Senate on Benghazi attack

[Updated 12:13 p.m. ET] CNN's chief Washington correspondent, Jake Tapper, says he wasn't surprised that Clinton became emotional when she recalled calling the families of the two State Department personnel who died in Benghazi - Ambassador Chris Stevens and computer expert Sean Smith.

"A lot of diplomatic people, we don’t perceive hem in this country as necessarily putting their lives at risk - we think, oh, they work for the State Department, their job is not as dangerous. And it’s not true," Tapper said. "And people like Secretary Clinton have now learned that firsthand. … The other point to take is, from sources close to her, this really did take a very, very, strong emotional toll on her. In addition to an exhausting job, I think probably it’s all part and parcel of the exhaustion we’ve seen that she’s been suffering.”

[Updated 12:05 p.m. ET] CNN's chief Washington correspondent, Jake Tapper, sums up the criticism that Clinton received from some Republicans on the Senate panel this morning:

"Republicans were focused on two areas of criticism. One, of course, (was) the fact that the administration - specifically the United Nations Ambassador Dr. Susan Rice - initially in the Sunday show appearances ... (gave the view that) this was not a terrorist attack, this was a spontaneous protest because of that anti-Islam video, which of course turns out not to have been the case.

"And a lot of senators - Ron Johnson and John McCain especially - focused on why were these talking points false. Specifically, Johnson said that Dr. Rice was purposefully misleading the American public. Dr. Rice, of course, has said she was not - that she was merely using the talking points provided by the intelligence community, and that there was no effort to mislead. She was providing as much information as she knew at the time.

"The other area where there was significant criticism, of course, came from Sen. Rand Paul, who was talking about the lack of accountability - how come nobody was fired? He said that if he had been president at the time ... he would have relieved Secretary Clinton of her job, specifically for not having read all of these cables from on the ground in Libya, of diplomatic personnel requesting more security in the months leading up to the attack."

[Updated 11:37 a.m. ET] This morning's hearing has concluded.

[Updated 11:36 a.m. ET] Chairman Menendez lists takeaways from today's hearing:

"We have to look at the totality of the threat environment," he says, when it comes to protecting our personnel, not just specific threats.

He also says there needs to be clear lines of authority, instead of styles when it comes to making those decisions about security.

Menendez says Congress should be able to provide the money to protect diplomatic personnel.

He says he hopes he can do that to "protect our people as robustly as possible" and that it would be a mark on Congress to not do it.

[Updated 11:32 a.m. ET] Clinton says posts in Baghdad and Kabul may be protected by private security. "Historically, Marine guards do not protect personnel," Clinton says, instead they take care of classified material and destroy it if it might fall into the wrong hands.

[Updated 11:24 a.m. ET] Clinton tells Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy that the diplomatic security situation going forward is largely unknown.

"We are in a new reality. We are trying to make sense of changes that nobody had predicted but that we will have to live with," she says.

"Let's be honest with ourselves, let's avoid turning everything into a political football. Let's try to say this is unprecedented, we don't know what's going to happen in this new revolutionary environment ... but let's see what lessons we can learned from the past," Clinton says.

[Updated 11:19 a.m. ET] Sen. Rand Paul says he thinks the Benghazi consulate should have been under military and not State Department protection and this could pose a problem for the U.S. elsewhere.

[Updated 11:16 a.m. ET] Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, says he would have fired Clinton over the Benghazi attack. "It was a failure of leadership not to be involved," Paul says, referring to Clinton's assertion that she couldn't read all the cables concerning security in Libya.

[Updated 11:13 a.m. ET] In response to a question about high-risks posts, Clinton cites Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen.

"In places where we know our facilities are being surveiled for certain attacks, where we have a steady intel stream of plotting against us, we make a decision, which is a difficult decision, whether that mission continues," Clinton says.

[Updated 11:08 a.m. ET] Clinton says al Qaeda remains a threat despite recent successes against its top leaders.

"Although there has been the decimation of core al Qaeda in certain regions we do have to contend with the wannabes and the affiliates going forward," she says.

[Updated 11:02 a.m. ET] Clinton says she wants a sensible budget discussion with Congress about the State Department. "We have to be smart in making the right investments in diplomacy," she says. She says it should be a "no-brainer" to transfer their own budget money around to improve diplomatic security.

[Updated 10:59 a.m. ET] In reference to earlier remarks that Congress is not doing enough, Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Illinois, puts some blame on Republicans in the House. He says the GOP-controlled chamber did not act on Clinton's request for a transfer of money to protect diplomatic personnel.

[Updated 10:55 a.m. ET] Clinton hints that Congress bears some responsibility for the security shortcomings in Benghazi. She says that congressional holds were placed on help for Libya.

"We've got to get our act together," she says of the administration and Congress.

[Updated 10:52 a.m. ET] McCain rips Clinton on how the State Department responded to security needs in Libya.

"I strongly disagree with your depiction of what we did after Gadhafi fell. We did not provide the security that was needed," he says. "We did not give them the kind of assistance that would have been necessary to dismantle the militias."

[Updated 10:50 a.m. ET] McCain is outraged over what he's heard so far from Clinton today. "Four months later and we still don't have the basic information," Mccain says.

[Updated 10:48 a.m. ET] Sen. John McCain calls Clinton's testimony so far today "not satisfactory to me."

[Updated 10:47 a.m. ET] Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, calls Clinton "as combative as ever," but he thanks her for her service to the country.

[Updated 10:43 a.m. ET] Clinton says threats to U.S. diplomatic posts are ongoing. "Sitting here today we probably have at least 20 other posts that are under a serious threat environment as I speak to you," Clinton says. "We are constantly assessing. Sometimes we get it wrong. We usually don't. But this (Benghazi) was one of those terrible tragic times where we got it wrong."

[Updated 10:40 a.m. ET]  "If you wish to fault the administration, it is that we didn't have a clear picture and we did not do as clear of a job (telling people that)," Clinton tells Sen. Jeff Flake in response to inquiries about what the U.S. knew and when U.S. officials knew it. "I can only assure you that as the information came to light and as people thought it was reliable we shared it," Clinton said.

[Updated 10:38 a.m. ET] On the initial characterization of the Benghazi attack as a protest, Clinton says in retrospective that maybe the State Department should have waited for a better assessment of the situation before issuing statements. "But thats not what we do as Americans," she said, noting we like to share what we know and note that it is subject to change.

[Updated 10:33 a.m. ET] Clinton says that right now it is more important to catch those responsible for the Benghazi attack than to figure out the "why" behind it.

[Updated 10:30 a.m. ET] Sen. Ron Johnson has a heated exchange with Clinton over the immediate response to the Libya attack, saying the State Department didn't give clear answers to the nature of the threat, that what was going on in Benghazi was more than a protests.

Clinton gets angry. "What difference at this point does it make?" she says, slamming her hand on the table. "The fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information."

[Updated 10:25 a.m. ET] Clinton says Congress needs to keep the State Department accountable for making proper security arrangements. Keep asking "What are you doing and how are you doing it" of the secretary of state, she says.

[Updated 10:22 a.m. ET] Responding to a question from Pennsylvania Sen. Robert Casey, Clinton says Congress can help diplomatic security by responding to department requests.

"You can help by making sure that the needs we come to you with, like what are the training needs, the budgetary needs, the bureaucratic changes, that you help support that," Clinton says.

[Updated 10:19 a.m. ET] Clinton says the Libyan government wanted to help with security for U.S. posts but didn't have the means to do so.

"In willingness, but not capacity," she said of the Libyan government. "The Libyans were very responsive, but had no levers to pull."

[Updated 10:15 a.m. ET] Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Florida, is asking again about security requests from the U.S. diplomatic posts in Libya.

"There were a number of conversations and meetings to try to see what we could do while Libya went through this transition ... to try to get in there to help them with security." Clinton reiterated that many of the requests never directly went through her.

[Updated 10:08 a.m. ET] Clinton says there were growing threats elsewhere after the Benghazi attack.

"I had to call the president of Tunisia to beg" for extra security while there was a threat against U.S. interests in Tunisia, she said.

[Updated 10:06 a.m. ET] Sen. James Risch of Idaho has directed the questioning back to Benghazi.

"It was a terrorist attack," Clinton says. "I called it an attack by heavily armed militants. That is clearly what happened. The harder question is what caused it? And that we didn't know."

[Updated 10:02 a.m. ET] Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-California, asks Clinton about what is happening with a jihadist insurgency in the northern African country of Mali.

Clinton says that Libyans with ties to former leader Moammar Gadhafi came into northern Mali at the same time there was a move by al Qaeda to establish a base there.

"We have been working to try and upgrade security around northern Mali," Clinton says. "We are now trying to help put together an African force so that African soldiers will be at the front of this fight."

"We cannot permit northern Mali to become a safe haven" (for al Qaeda), Clinton says. "This is not only a terrorist syndicate, it is a criminal enterprise. Make no mistake about it, we've got to have a better strategy (for Mali)."

[Updated 9:56 a.m. ET] Clinton talks about the security climate faced by U.S. diplomatic posts going forward:

"We now face a spreading jihadist threat. We have driven a lot of the al Qaeda operatives out ..., killed a lot of them, including of course bin Laden. But we have to recognize this is a global movement. We can kill leaders, but until we establish democratic institutions, our values, we're going to be faced with this level of instability."

[Updated 9:47 a.m. ET] Sen. Corker asks why security changes weren't made when officials were "screaming out" for help.

"We did immediately do this high threat assessment," Clinton responds, noting that had never been done before. Clinton said she wanted more Marine guards, security guards, updates to construction. Clinton says that she has also recommended that the next secretary state and deputies are now included in conversations about request for security.

[Updated 9:44 a.m. ET] On her response when notified of the attack, Clinton says she went into continuous meetings. "I instructed our senior department officials and diplomatic security to consider every option - to break down the doors to the Libyan officials to get as much security support as we could," she said.

[Updated 9:41 a.m. ET] Clinton says there were efforts to upgrade the security of the Benghazi facility that was attacked. "There were inadequacies in the response. Those are the specific kind of recommendations we are currently implementing," she said.

[Updated 9:37 a.m. ET] Clinton says there conversations within the State Department of what would be the safest compound for U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens to be in.

[Updated 9:25 a.m. ET] "As I have said many times since September 11, I take responsibility," Clinton said of the security for the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. "Nobody is more committed to getting this right. I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger, and more secure."

[Updated 9:22 a.m. ET] Secretary of State Clinton has begun reading her prepared text.

[Updated 9:20 a.m. ET] Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tennessee, called an earlier briefing on the Benghazi attack "bizarre," because of how little information was given.

[Updated 9:14 a.m. ET] "I know I speak for many when I say you've been an excellent secretary of state," Sen. Robert Menendez said, referring to all of the work Clinton has done during her tenure. "You have changed the face of America abroad."

[Updated 9:04 a.m. ET] Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The hearing has begun with remarks by Sen. Robert Menendez, who is standing in as chairman of the committee for Sen. John Kerry. Kerry recused himself from the hearing as he has been nominated to replace Clinton as secretary of state.

[Posted 8:34 a.m. ET] Republican members of Congress plan a host of questions for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her long-awaited testimony on Wednesday about the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya.

Questions are expected to range from a security vacuum in northern Africa to new cables suggesting that Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was killed in the September 11 assault, once proposed moving the compound to a more secure location adjacent the CIA Annex, sources tell CNN.

Clinton will testify for 90 minutes before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee beginning at 9 a.m., and 90 minutes before the House Foreign Affairs Committee beginning at 2 p.m.

soundoff (799 Responses)
  1. romie

    Durbin good one, Mccain could not have seen that coming. Iraqi weapons of mass destruction still looking for them

    January 23, 2013 at 10:58 am | Report abuse |
    • Ancient Texan

      Dumb Durbin has no idea what happened in Benghazi and is trying to divert attention from a classic failure in foreign policy and protection for our Ambassador.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:18 am | Report abuse |
  2. WW

    Isn't it pathetic that one can determine the party of the questioner simply by hearing the question and accompanying comment?
    Who is putting the country first?

    January 23, 2013 at 10:58 am | Report abuse |
    • WDL

      What a shame.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:04 am | Report abuse |
  3. WDL

    What people need to start doing is telling the truth about our Congressman and women. Some of these people do not need to serve this country. Too many hidden agendas.

    January 23, 2013 at 10:58 am | Report abuse |
  4. chuckly

    all the republicans are doing is campaigning for 2016. They are trying their hardest to damage her now, because if they don't , she will rip them a new one in the 2016 race.

    January 23, 2013 at 10:59 am | Report abuse |
    • Bill D

      No, she claims she isn't interested in running in '16. Or is that just another one of her lies?

      January 23, 2013 at 11:01 am | Report abuse |
    • chuckly

      whether she is or not, the Right is scared to death that she is, because they will have no shot if she does. So call this a pre-emtive strike.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:04 am | Report abuse |
    • jnpa

      That is so correct! Then we have McCain opening his mouth again and causing riff in the process. He may have been a great military officer but as a member of congress?....not so much!

      January 23, 2013 at 11:14 am | Report abuse |
  5. whimsical

    Are tears the new Democratic way to show action? Mr. Obama sheds a few tears when he addresses tragic issues, and now it is Mrs. Clinton.

    January 23, 2013 at 10:59 am | Report abuse |
    • mike electrician

      And John Boehner tears up at nearly every occasion.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:03 am | Report abuse |
  6. Rob

    Clinton is a un-American, freedom hating liar. She needs to be sent to prison for her acts of treason, along with the rest of the DemocRATS.

    January 23, 2013 at 10:59 am | Report abuse |
    • Siestasis

      Rob, she has spent most of her adult life working for this country, what the H have you done besides sit on your butt and watch TV.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:04 am | Report abuse |
  7. David

    This is all one big right wing conspiracy............right Hillary.

    January 23, 2013 at 11:00 am | Report abuse |
    • cincinnatidavid

      You must have noticed the GOP conspiracy to unseat President Obama at all cost. And what cost! No unseating.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:31 am | Report abuse |
  8. FubarObama

    For all the Hillary defenders out there..face it, Your team FAILED. This administration is complicit in cowardliness, lies and coverups. Our Hillary is crying because they dropped the ball and let 4 Americans die as Obama ran to Vegas to grab $$ then stonewalled until after election. I believe this act will finaly doom the Clintons from their strategy of getting Bill (aka Hillary) back into the WH. Good riddence,

    January 23, 2013 at 11:01 am | Report abuse |
    • Siestasis

      Face it your party failed to fund the necessary security that was requested. Face it your party will lose in 2014 and 2016 because they care not for the country but only for serving their masters the KOCH brothers.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:06 am | Report abuse |
    • Pepinium

      Fubar, there are 4 Democratic votes in my house that are ready to go for Hillary right now !!. Have a lousy next four years, and an even lousier 8, right after that, :))).

      January 23, 2013 at 11:32 am | Report abuse |
  9. mike electrician

    And nearly a question by the GOP to Bush/Cheney about 5,000+ dead Americans because of their faulty (misleading) intelligence. The GOP couldn't run a high school, much less the congress. I am sorry, every FSO knows that if they are heading to any region things may get dicey.

    January 23, 2013 at 11:02 am | Report abuse |
  10. infonomics

    “Senator: Was Benghazi a failure of your department?

    Hillary: It depends what you mean by "of " !”

    January 23, 2013 at 11:02 am | Report abuse |
  11. Pam Hoppes

    This investigation (interview) is coming across as (Clinton's thank you/recognition day and Face the Nation). The people want to know the truth about what happened to those AMERICANS who died. This is not about H. Clinton. By the way John McCain is an honorable man and should be show the respect he deserves. What has happened to the American Values and showing respect. Have people forgotten what Bill Clinton did to this country and to his family?? Where are the values of honor and respect. This younger generation has no clue to what this country is all about. It is all about "them". Well earn it and you shall receive it as those who have served this country.

    January 23, 2013 at 11:02 am | Report abuse |
    • Scottish Mama

      Bill Clinton balanced the budget. What has Bush done to the country?

      January 23, 2013 at 11:07 am | Report abuse |
    • WDL

      Sorry, but the man is past his time, and show plenty of hate opposed to helping the nation.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:11 am | Report abuse |
    • biglio

      Yep, McCain surely was shown a lot of respect from Bush and the other GOP hacks during the primaries.......

      January 23, 2013 at 11:13 am | Report abuse |
  12. kommy

    Wow, Clinton confessed, – what she didn't tell- that it was of her effort to create this situation. Unless this was some kind of devious plan to bring all bogies into the sun light and make them bleed in other places than Iraq and Afghanistan, and destroy all Arab countries for the benefit of Israel, this is outright dumb.

    January 23, 2013 at 11:02 am | Report abuse |
    • Scottish Mama

      Democracy was her plan. Arab spring was the peoples idea.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:08 am | Report abuse |
    • WDL

      OMG, are we listening to the same broadcast?
      This is why America is divided, we hate instead of trying to find truth and pull our acts together. Come on dude.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:09 am | Report abuse |
    • kommy

      Yes, we were listening to the same broadcast. What Clinton says that uncorking the bottle made less Ginny in the bottle, but what she failed to mention that this created a whole new breading ground for Ginny. Arabs lost 225 billions in "spring"- now they are free (??)...and poor, – a perfect ground for extremists to pick their lost souls.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:32 am | Report abuse |
  13. Tracy

    I find it almost funny how the Republican party can try and do the blame game any time it involved a Democrat but still don't take any fault for the two wars that Bush started under lies costing so many lives and trillions of dollars. I can only hope that HIllary runs for President in 2016. She is the smartest and boldest of Democrat's. Not one to tangle with. John McCain is an Idiot.. The man who added Sarah Palin to his ticket as VP not satisfied with Clinton's answers. Hes never happy unless hes talking to a brick wall or himself!!!!

    January 23, 2013 at 11:03 am | Report abuse |
    • WDL

      It is so crazy.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:05 am | Report abuse |
    • infonomics

      Hillary in 2016? No way, Hillary is not half the man that she thinks she is !

      January 23, 2013 at 11:12 am | Report abuse |
    • Ancient Texan

      "lies" that Bill and Hillary Clinton also told us about the WMDs in Iraq, and John Kerry telling us that if we didn't believe they were there, then we shouldn't vote for him. There were NO lies, just flawed intelligence.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:23 am | Report abuse |
  14. Mike

    Political theater. GOP trying to break her before the next election.

    January 23, 2013 at 11:03 am | Report abuse |
  15. Joel

    That what happened when you have unqualified personal mending the defense of our country, who is Mrs. Clinton? what her qualification? just a wife of former president, which I liked and voted for, but yet that does not make her qualify to be secretary of state, and so the tax cheater Geithner, attorney Holden, with his fast and fiero fiasco.

    January 23, 2013 at 11:04 am | Report abuse |
    • WDL


      January 23, 2013 at 11:07 am | Report abuse |
    • Siestasis

      She is a very well educated and intelligent woman, She has a law degree and served as a Senator. Much better qualified then most of the clowns the GOP has in the Congress. But then you probably have never met a smart woman.

      January 23, 2013 at 11:09 am | Report abuse |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28