[Updated at 3:03 p.m. ET] Sen. Rand Paul has told CNN's Dana Bash that he will allow a vote to end his filibuster against CIA director nominee John Brennan.
He says he's doing this because he's received an answer from the Obama administration about his question on drones.
[Posted at 2:15 p.m. ET] After a nearly 13-hour filibuster by Sen. Rand Paul over his questions about drones, the U.S. attorney general has given a response.
Attorney General Eric Holder says the president does not have the authority to use a drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on U.S. soil, according to a letter he addressed to Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday.
"It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: 'Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?' The answer to that question is no," the letter states.
FULL STORY
well alwwight...there will be no blowin t'bits of american citizens...drone daddy yahjust gonna haftah stick to beercans, beerbottles, and terrorists...yeeee-haaahhh!
Whoya callin drone daddy? Commin soon to a nawlins nayborhud nearya.
O you silly goose.
Oh good. Paul is happy.
The system works.
hooray.
It's a good thing Paul did this or the President would be killing folks left, right and center with those drones.
This will hopefully put to rest all of the conspiracy theorist's idea that the President will use drones on our citizens within the US, just as I stated all along will not happen.
banasy: Makes me wonder what the heck WE, the people are thinking? IF any president, or one of our "elected children" did this it would result in immediate impeachment, and jail time for anyone following such an order!
True. Now you just gotta worry about the CIA! Lol
Does the sen. Run a moonshine still that hes been sippin on?